IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Dayarian
  • Madalena Chaves
  • Eduardo D Sontag
  • Anirvan M Sengupta

Abstract

The concept of robustness of regulatory networks has received much attention in the last decade. One measure of robustness has been associated with the volume of the feasible region, namely, the region in the parameter space in which the system is functional. In this paper, we show that, in addition to volume, the geometry of this region has important consequences for the robustness and the fragility of a network. We develop an approximation within which we could algebraically specify the feasible region. We analyze the segment polarity gene network to illustrate our approach. The study of random walks in the parameter space and how they exit the feasible region provide us with a rich perspective on the different modes of failure of this network model. In particular, we found that, between two alternative ways of activating Wingless, one is more robust than the other. Our method provides a more complete measure of robustness to parameter variation. As a general modeling strategy, our approach is an interesting alternative to Boolean representation of biochemical networks.Author Summary: Developing models with a large number of parameters for describing the dynamics of a biochemical network is a common exercise today. The dependence of predictions of such a network model on the choice of parameters is important to understand for two reasons. For the purpose of fitting biological data and making predictions, we need to know which combinations of parameters are strongly constrained by observations and also which combinations seriously affect a particular prediction. In addition, we expect naturally evolved networks to be somewhat robust to parameter changes. If the functioning of the network requires fine-tuning in many parameters, then mutations causing changes in regulatory interactions could quickly make the network dysfunctional. For predictions involving gene products being ON or OFF, we found a method that facilitates the study parameter dependence. As an example, we analyzed several competing models of the segment polarity network in Drosophila. We explicitly describe the region in the parameter space where the wild-type expression pattern of key genes becomes feasible for each model. We also study how random walks in the parameter space exit from the feasible region of a network model, allowing us to compare the relative robustness of the alternative models.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Dayarian & Madalena Chaves & Eduardo D Sontag & Anirvan M Sengupta, 2009. "Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000256
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000256&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Alon & M. G. Surette & N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1999. "Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 168-171, January.
    2. Ryan N Gutenkunst & Joshua J Waterfall & Fergal P Casey & Kevin S Brown & Christopher R Myers & James P Sethna, 2007. "Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.
    3. George von Dassow & Eli Meir & Edwin M. Munro & Garrett M. Odell, 2000. "The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6792), pages 188-192, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Hafner & Heinz Koeppl & Martin Hasler & Andreas Wagner, 2009. "‘Glocal’ Robustness Analysis and Model Discrimination for Circadian Oscillators," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Zeina Shreif & Vipul Periwal, 2014. "A Network Characteristic That Correlates Environmental and Genetic Robustness," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeina Shreif & Vipul Periwal, 2014. "A Network Characteristic That Correlates Environmental and Genetic Robustness," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Andreas Wagner, 2015. "Causal Drift, Robust Signaling, and Complex Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Guillermo Rodrigo & Santiago F Elena, 2011. "Structural Discrimination of Robustness in Transcriptional Feedforward Loops for Pattern Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    4. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Samuel Bandara & Johannes P Schlöder & Roland Eils & Hans Georg Bock & Tobias Meyer, 2009. "Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Jae Kyoung Kim & Trachette L Jackson, 2013. "Mechanisms That Enhance Sustainability of p53 Pulses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    8. Oliver Pohl & Marius Hintsche & Zahra Alirezaeizanjani & Maximilian Seyrich & Carsten Beta & Holger Stark, 2017. "Inferring the Chemotactic Strategy of P. putida and E. coli Using Modified Kramers-Moyal Coefficients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Jinlong Yuan & Lei Wang & Xu Zhang & Enmin Feng & Hongchao Yin & Zhilong Xiu, 2015. "Parameter identification for a nonlinear enzyme-catalytic dynamic system with time-delays," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 791-810, August.
    10. Miri Adler & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2014. "Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Amrita X Sarkar & Eric A Sobie, 2010. "Regression Analysis for Constraining Free Parameters in Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Hongwei Shao & Tao Peng & Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Xiaobo Zhou, 2013. "Systematically Studying Kinase Inhibitor Induced Signaling Network Signatures by Integrating Both Therapeutic and Side Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Alireza Yazdani & Lu Lu & Maziar Raissi & George Em Karniadakis, 2020. "Systems biology informed deep learning for inferring parameters and hidden dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Fridtjof Brauns & Leila Iñigo de la Cruz & Werner K.-G. Daalman & Ilse Bruin & Jacob Halatek & Liedewij Laan & Erwin Frey, 2023. "Redundancy and the role of protein copy numbers in the cell polarization machinery of budding yeast," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Payne, Joshua L., 2016. "No tradeoff between versatility and robustness in gene circuit motifs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 192-199.
    17. Eberhard O Voit & Harald A Martens & Stig W Omholt, 2015. "150 Years of the Mass Action Law," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, January.
    18. Céline Christiansen-Jucht & Kamil Erguler & Chee Yan Shek & María-Gloria Basáñez & Paul E. Parham, 2015. "Modelling Anopheles gambiae s.s. Population Dynamics with Temperature- and Age-Dependent Survival," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Gabriele Lillacci & Mustafa Khammash, 2010. "Parameter Estimation and Model Selection in Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Andrew White & Malachi Tolman & Howard D Thames & Hubert Rodney Withers & Kathy A Mason & Mark K Transtrum, 2016. "The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.