IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1000919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragilities Caused by Dosage Imbalance in Regulation of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Kazunari Kaizu
  • Hisao Moriya
  • Hiroaki Kitano

Abstract

Cells can maintain their functions despite fluctuations in intracellular parameters, such as protein activities and gene expression levels. This commonly observed biological property of cells is called robustness. On the other hand, these parameters have different limitations, each reflecting the property of the subsystem containing the parameter. The budding yeast cell cycle is quite fragile upon overexpression of CDC14, but is robust upon overexpression of ESP1. The gene products of both CDC14 and ESP1 are regulated by 1∶1 binding with their inhibitors (Net1 and Pds1), and a mathematical model predicts the extreme fragility of the cell cycle upon overexpression of CDC14 and ESP1 caused by dosage imbalance between these genes. However, it has not been experimentally shown that dosage imbalance causes fragility of the cell cycle. In this study, we measured the quantitative genetic interactions of these genes by performing combinatorial “genetic tug-of-war” experiments. We first showed experimental evidence that dosage imbalance between CDC14 and NET1 causes fragility. We also showed that fragility arising from dosage imbalance between ESP1 and PDS1 is masked by CDH1 and CLB2. The masking function of CLB2 was stabilization of Pds1 by its phosphorylation. We finally modified Chen's model according to our findings. We thus propose that dosage imbalance causes fragility in biological systems.Author Summary: Normal cell functioning is dependent on balance between protein interactions and gene regulations. Although the balance is often perturbed by environmental changes, mutations, and noise in biochemical reactions, cellular systems can maintain their function despite these perturbations. This property of cells, called robustness, is now considered to be a design principle of biological systems and has become a central theme for systems biology. We previously developed an experimental method designated “genetic tug-of-war,” in which we assessed the robustness of cellular systems upon overexpression of certain genes, especially that of the budding yeast cell cycle. Although the yeast cell cycle can be maintained despite significant overexpression of most genes within the system, the cell cycle halts upon just two-fold overexpression of M phase phosphatase CDC14. In this study, we experimentally showed that this fragility is caused by dosage imbalance between CDC14 and NET1. Interestingly, fragility of regulation of separase gene ESP1, potentially caused by dosage imbalance, was masked by regulation of other factors such as CDH1 and CLB2. We thus propose that dosage imbalance causes fragility in biological systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazunari Kaizu & Hisao Moriya & Hiroaki Kitano, 2010. "Fragilities Caused by Dosage Imbalance in Regulation of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000919
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000919&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Alon & M. G. Surette & N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1999. "Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 168-171, January.
    2. George von Dassow & Eli Meir & Edwin M. Munro & Garrett M. Odell, 2000. "The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6792), pages 188-192, July.
    3. N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1997. "Robustness in simple biochemical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6636), pages 913-917, June.
    4. Erez Dekel & Uri Alon, 2005. "Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7050), pages 588-592, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasmin Fisher & Nir Piterman & Alex Hajnal & Thomas A Henzinger, 2007. "Predictive Modeling of Signaling Crosstalk during C. elegans Vulval Development," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Zeina Shreif & Vipul Periwal, 2014. "A Network Characteristic That Correlates Environmental and Genetic Robustness," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Guillermo Rodrigo & Santiago F Elena, 2011. "Structural Discrimination of Robustness in Transcriptional Feedforward Loops for Pattern Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    4. Önder Kartal & Oliver Ebenhöh, 2009. "Ground State Robustness as an Evolutionary Design Principle in Signaling Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Jae Kyoung Kim & Trachette L Jackson, 2013. "Mechanisms That Enhance Sustainability of p53 Pulses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    7. Jinlong Yuan & Lei Wang & Xu Zhang & Enmin Feng & Hongchao Yin & Zhilong Xiu, 2015. "Parameter identification for a nonlinear enzyme-catalytic dynamic system with time-delays," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 791-810, August.
    8. Adel Dayarian & Madalena Chaves & Eduardo D Sontag & Anirvan M Sengupta, 2009. "Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Miri Adler & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2014. "Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. David A Sivak & Matt Thomson, 2014. "Environmental Statistics and Optimal Regulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Deyan Luan & Michael Zai & Jeffrey D Varner, 2007. "Computationally Derived Points of Fragility of a Human Cascade Are Consistent with Current Therapeutic Strategies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Kirstin Meyer & Nicholas C. Lammers & Lukasz J. Bugaj & Hernan G. Garcia & Orion D. Weiner, 2023. "Optogenetic control of YAP reveals a dynamic communication code for stem cell fate and proliferation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Alessandro Romanel & Lars Juhl Jensen & Luca Cardelli & Attila Csikász-Nagy, 2012. "Transcriptional Regulation Is a Major Controller of Cell Cycle Transition Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, January.
    15. Diana Clausznitzer & Olga Oleksiuk & Linda Løvdok & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2010. "Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    16. Robert Planqué & Josephus Hulshof & Bas Teusink & Johannes C Hendriks & Frank J Bruggeman, 2018. "Maintaining maximal metabolic flux by gene expression control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    18. Nikita Vladimirov & Linda Løvdok & Dirk Lebiedz & Victor Sourjik, 2008. "Dependence of Bacterial Chemotaxis on Gradient Shape and Adaptation Rate," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Robert J Prill & Pablo A Iglesias & Andre Levchenko, 2005. "Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-1, October.
    20. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.