IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i4p953-961..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation

Author

Listed:
  • Demetra Andreou
  • Christophe Eizaguirre
  • Thomas Boehm
  • Manfred Milinski

Abstract

Lay SummaryThe role of sexual selection in driving speciation is supported by correlative links between various traits under sexual selection and speciation. However, there is little evidence on the candidate genes involved in mate choice enabling speciation. Experiments on stickleback mate choice highlight the polymorphic immunogenes of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) as a true “magic trait”: the MHC drives both habitat-specific assortative mate choice and local adaptation—ultimately speciation.

Suggested Citation

  • Demetra Andreou & Christophe Eizaguirre & Thomas Boehm & Manfred Milinski, 2017. "Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 953-961.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:953-961.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John N. Thompson & Bradley M. Cunningham, 2002. "Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6890), pages 735-738, June.
    2. Janette Wenrick Boughman, 2001. "Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6840), pages 944-948, June.
    3. Ole Seehausen & Yohey Terai & Isabel S. Magalhaes & Karen L. Carleton & Hillary D. J. Mrosso & Ryutaro Miyagi & Inke van der Sluijs & Maria V. Schneider & Martine E. Maan & Hidenori Tachida & Hiroo Im, 2008. "Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7213), pages 620-626, October.
    4. Genevieve M. Kozak & Janette W. Boughman, 2009. "Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1282-1288.
    5. Richard Buchholz, 2004. "Effects of parasitic infection on mate sampling by female wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo): should infected females be more or less choosy?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 687-694, July.
    6. Angus Buckling & Paul B. Rainey, 2002. "The role of parasites in sympatric and allopatric host diversification," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6915), pages 496-499, December.
    7. Nicole E. Rafferty & Janette Wenrick Boughman, 2006. "Olfactory mate recognition in a sympatric species pair of three-spined sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 965-970, November.
    8. Jan Heuschele & Miia Mannerla & Phillip Gienapp & Ulrika Candolin, 2009. "Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1223-1227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    2. Gina M Calabrese & Karin S Pfennig, 2021. "Female mate preferences do not predict male sexual signals across populations [Hybridization and speciation]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1183-1191.
    3. Dur, Gaël & Won, Eun-Ji & Han, Jeonghoon & Lee, Jae-Seong & Souissi, Sami, 2021. "An individual-based model for evaluating post-exposure effects of UV-B radiation on zooplankton reproduction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    4. Patrik Nosil & Zachariah Gompert & Daniel J. Funk, 2024. "Divergent dynamics of sexual and habitat isolation at the transition between stick insect populations and species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Liam R Dougherty, 2023. "The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 197-209.
    6. Jason Keagy & Jean-François Savard & Gerald Borgia, 2012. "Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 448-456.
    7. Geerat Vermeij, 2009. "Comparative economics: evolution and the modern economy," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 105-134, August.
    8. Minke B. W. Langenhof & Jan Komdeur, 2013. "Coping with Change: A Closer Look at the Underlying Attributes of Change and the Individual Response to Unstable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Jeffrey S McKinnon & Nick Hamele & Nicole Frey & Jennifer Chou & Leia McAleavey & Jess Greene & Windi Paulson, 2012. "Male Choice in the Stream-Anadromous Stickleback Complex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    10. Lisa A. Taylor & Kevin J. McGraw, 2013. "Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 955-967.
    11. Koo, Kyung-Ah & Patten, Bernard C. & Teskey, Robert O., 2011. "Assessing environmental factors in red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) growth in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA: From conceptual model, envirogram, to simulation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 824-834.
    12. Mary J. Montague & Marine Danek-Gontard & Hansjoerg P. Kunc, 2013. "Phenotypic plasticity affects the response of a sexually selected trait to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 343-348.
    13. Nathan W Bailey & Lucas Marie-Orleach & Allen J Moore & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11.
    14. Robin M. Tinghitella & Whitley R. Lehto & Ross Minter, 2015. "The evolutionary loss of a badge of status alters male competition in three-spine stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 609-616.
    15. E.H. DuVal & J.A. Kapoor, 2015. "Causes and consequences of variation in female mate search investment in a lekking bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1537-1547.
    16. Krista R. B. Gert & Karin Panser & Joachim Surm & Benjamin S. Steinmetz & Alexander Schleiffer & Luca Jovine & Yehu Moran & Fyodor Kondrashov & Andrea Pauli, 2023. "Divergent molecular signatures in fish Bouncer proteins define cross-fertilization boundaries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Benjamin M B Downer-Bartholomew & F Helen Rodd, 2022. "Female preference for color-enhanced males: a test of the sensory bias model in medaka, a drab fish [A new system for marking hatchling turtles using visible implant elastomer]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 252-262.
    18. Yao-Hua Zhang & Yu-Feng Du & Jian-Xu Zhang, 2013. "Editor's choice Uropygial gland volatiles facilitate species recognition between two sympatric sibling bird species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1271-1278.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:953-961.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.