IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p252-262..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female preference for color-enhanced males: a test of the sensory bias model in medaka, a drab fish
[A new system for marking hatchling turtles using visible implant elastomer]

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin M B Downer-Bartholomew
  • F Helen Rodd

Abstract

Sexual selection research has long focused on the evolution of female mate preferences. Most of the models that have been developed posit that mate preferences evolve in a mating context. In contrast, the sensory bias model proposes that mate choice preferences arise in a non-mating context, as a by-product of natural selection acting on a female’s perceptual system. Recent research has shown that many species of fishes, from across a large clade including poeciliids, goodeids, and medaka, have a bias for long wavelength (LW) colors (yellow, orange, red) in a non-mating context. Even species that do not have LW-colored ornaments, apparently because they have been lost secondarily, retain this latent bias for LW colors. Here, we predicted that female Oryzias latipes (Japanese medaka), a drab species with a latent preference for LW colors, would show a mate choice preference for males with an artificial secondary sexual trait—a colored stripe added to their flank. We confirmed that females were more responsive to red and orange objects in a non-mating context than to other colors. We also showed that females were less resistant towards males with an LW-colored stripe than to those enhanced with a non-LW stripe and that, for many females, responses towards specific LW colors were consistent across these non-mating and mating contexts. Therefore, our results provide support for the sensory bias model by providing a link between a sensory bias in a non-mating context and a mate choice preference in a drab species like medaka.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin M B Downer-Bartholomew & F Helen Rodd, 2022. "Female preference for color-enhanced males: a test of the sensory bias model in medaka, a drab fish [A new system for marking hatchling turtles using visible implant elastomer]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 252-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:252-262.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen McDowell, 2003. "From the help desk: hurdle models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(2), pages 178-184, June.
    2. Ole Seehausen & Yohey Terai & Isabel S. Magalhaes & Karen L. Carleton & Hillary D. J. Mrosso & Ryutaro Miyagi & Inke van der Sluijs & Maria V. Schneider & Martine E. Maan & Hidenori Tachida & Hiroo Im, 2008. "Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish," Nature, Nature, vol. 455(7213), pages 620-626, October.
    3. Brett M Culbert & Sanduni Talagala & James B Barnett & Emily Stanbrook & Parker Smale & Sigal Balshine & Marie Herberstein, 2020. "Context-dependent consequences of color biases in a social fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(6), pages 1410-1419.
    4. Katie E. McGhee & Rebecca C. Fuller & Joseph Travis, 2007. "Male competition and female choice interact to determine mating success in the bluefin killifish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 822-830.
    5. Tsuyoshi Shimmura & Tomoya Nakayama & Ai Shinomiya & Shoji Fukamachi & Masaki Yasugi & Eiji Watanabe & Takayuki Shimo & Takumi Senga & Toshiya Nishimura & Minoru Tanaka & Yasuhiro Kamei & Kiyoshi Naru, 2017. "Dynamic plasticity in phototransduction regulates seasonal changes in color perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Constantino Macías Garcia & Elvia Ramirez, 2005. "Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7032), pages 501-505, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dur, Gaël & Won, Eun-Ji & Han, Jeonghoon & Lee, Jae-Seong & Souissi, Sami, 2021. "An individual-based model for evaluating post-exposure effects of UV-B radiation on zooplankton reproduction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    2. Bray, Mark & Zhan, Shengli & Lykins, Chad & Wang, Dan & Kwo, Ora, 2014. "Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 24-37.
    3. Patrik Nosil & Zachariah Gompert & Daniel J. Funk, 2024. "Divergent dynamics of sexual and habitat isolation at the transition between stick insect populations and species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Nikiforakis, Nikos, 2010. "Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 689-702, March.
    5. Megha Mukim & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2012. "The Location Choices of Foreign Investors: A District-level Analysis in India," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(7), pages 886-918, July.
    6. Rozana Himaz, 2010. "Intrahousehold Allocation of Education Expenditure: The Case of Sri Lanka," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 231-258, January.
    7. Gina M Calabrese & Karin S Pfennig, 2021. "Female mate preferences do not predict male sexual signals across populations [Hybridization and speciation]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1183-1191.
    8. Christoph Engel, 2011. "Dictator games: a meta study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(4), pages 583-610, November.
    9. Rees, Carter & Wallace, Danielle, 2014. "The myth of conformity: Adolescents and abstention from unhealthy drinking behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 34-45.
    10. Jiang, Yuan & House, Lisa & Tejera, Christian & Percival, Susan S., 2015. "Consumption of Mushrooms: A double-hurdle Approach," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196902, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Wesley Bertoli & Katiane S. Conceição & Marinho G. Andrade & Francisco Louzada, 2018. "On the zero-modified Poisson–Shanker regression model and its application to fetal deaths notification data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 807-836, June.
    12. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Nikos Nikiforakis, 2011. "Relative Earnings and Giving in a Real-Effort Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3330-3348, December.
    13. Riccardo Pedersini & Rosemarie Nagel & Marc Le Menestrel, 2019. "The Power of Requests in a Redistribution Game: An Experimental Study," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Nikos Nikiforakis & Dirk Engelmann, 2008. "Feuds in the Laboratory? A Social Dilemma Experiment," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1058, The University of Melbourne.
    15. Egemen İPEK, 2019. "An Empirical Study on Alcohol Participation and Consumption Decision in Turkey," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 27(41).
    16. Anabela Botelho, 2013. "The impact of regulatory compliance behavior on hazardous waste generation in European private healthcare facilities," NIMA Working Papers 49, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    17. Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P. & Detre, Joshua D., 2009. "Internet Access and Internet Purchasing Patterns of Farm Households," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Tan, Fangfang & Xiao, Erte, 2018. "Third-party punishment: Retribution or deterrence?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 34-46.
    19. Gangadharan, Lata & Harrison, Glenn W. & Leroux, Anke D., 2019. "Are risks over multiple attributes traded off? A case study of aid," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 166-198.
    20. Offerman, Theo & van der Veen, Ailko, 2015. "How to subsidize contributions to public goods: Does the frog jump out of the boiling water?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 96-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:252-262.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.