IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p609-616..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolutionary loss of a badge of status alters male competition in three-spine stickleback

Author

Listed:
  • Robin M. Tinghitella
  • Whitley R. Lehto
  • Ross Minter

Abstract

The evolutionary loss of sexual signals is taxonomically widespread and quite common. These signals are often important not only in mate choice but also in male competition for territories and females; yet, male competition has rarely been investigated in the context of signal loss. We asked whether the loss of red throat color in three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), an ancestral signal important in both male competition and mate choice, is accompanied by changes to intrasexual selection. Several freshwater stickleback populations have lost the red throat, and instead develop black breeding coloration. Previous work demonstrated that sensory drive is likely responsible. We conducted trials that mimic contact between ancestral (red) and derived (black) types during territory and nest establishment under conditions mimicking the 2 water color environments (clear and red-shifted, respectively) where they are found. We found that the allocation of competition behaviors depends on male breeding color, but not water color or the interaction of the 2. Although the total number of aggressive behaviors did not vary between color types, black males directed more aggression toward red males. Assessing each male competition behavior separately revealed that this pattern was largely driven by black fish biasing "charges" toward opposite type males. Agonistic behavior between types may strengthen divergence in resource or habitat use between populations of males with and without the ancestral sexual signal.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin M. Tinghitella & Whitley R. Lehto & Ross Minter, 2015. "The evolutionary loss of a badge of status alters male competition in three-spine stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 609-616.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:609-616.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janette Wenrick Boughman, 2001. "Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6840), pages 944-948, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    2. Gina M Calabrese & Karin S Pfennig, 2021. "Female mate preferences do not predict male sexual signals across populations [Hybridization and speciation]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1183-1191.
    3. Demetra Andreou & Christophe Eizaguirre & Thomas Boehm & Manfred Milinski, 2017. "Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 953-961.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:609-616.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.