IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i6p1223-1227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Heuschele
  • Miia Mannerla
  • Phillip Gienapp
  • Ulrika Candolin

Abstract

Human-induced environmental changes alter terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems worldwide. This influences also evolutionary processes, such as sexual selection, by constraining mate choice and mate competition. Organisms often use multiple cues in mate choice, with different cues indicating the same or different benefits. Because the assessment and information content of cues can vary with environmental conditions, changes in the environment could alter mate choice. Here we determined if increased phytoplankton turbidity influences the relative use of olfactory and visual cues in mate choice in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. In a mate choice experiment, we found that females relied more on visual than olfactory cues in clear water. However, in turbid water, the pattern was the opposite with olfactory cues being more important than visual cues. Interestingly, mate preferences based on visual and olfactory cues did not agree, which suggests that human-induced environmental change could shift mate choice. This could influence the direction and target of sexual selection and have further consequences for the viability of the population under the new conditions. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Heuschele & Miia Mannerla & Phillip Gienapp & Ulrika Candolin, 2009. "Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1223-1227.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1223-1227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp123
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demetra Andreou & Christophe Eizaguirre & Thomas Boehm & Manfred Milinski, 2017. "Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 953-961.
    2. Minke B. W. Langenhof & Jan Komdeur, 2013. "Coping with Change: A Closer Look at the Underlying Attributes of Change and the Individual Response to Unstable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Lisa A. Taylor & Kevin J. McGraw, 2013. "Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 955-967.
    4. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    5. Mary J. Montague & Marine Danek-Gontard & Hansjoerg P. Kunc, 2013. "Phenotypic plasticity affects the response of a sexually selected trait to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 343-348.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1223-1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.