IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v34y2023i2p197-209..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males

Author

Listed:
  • Liam R Dougherty

Abstract

Animals are thought to gain significant fitness benefits from choosing high-quality or compatible mates. However, there is large within-species variation in how choosy individuals are during mating. This may be because the costs and benefits of being choosy vary according to an individual’s state. To test this, I systematically searched for published data relating the strength of animal mate choice in both sexes to individual age, attractiveness, body size, physical condition, mating status, and parasite load. I performed a meta-analysis of 108 studies and 78 animal species to quantify how the strength of mate choice varies according to individual state. In line with the predictions of sexual selection theory, I find that females are significantly choosier when they are large and have a low parasite load, thus supporting the premise that the expression of female mate choice is dependent on the costs and benefits of being choosy. However, female choice was not influenced by female age, attractiveness, physical condition, or mating status. Attractive males were significantly choosier than unattractive males, but male mate choice was not influenced by male age, body size, physical condition, mating status, or parasite load. However, this dataset was limited by a small sample size, and the overall correlation between individual state and the strength of mate choice was similar for both sexes. Nevertheless, in both males and females individual state explained only a small amount of variation in the strength of mate choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Liam R Dougherty, 2023. "The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 197-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:197-209.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elina Immonen & Anneli Hoikkala & Anahita J.N. Kazem & Michael G. Ritchie, 2009. "When are vomiting males attractive? Sexual selection on condition-dependent nuptial feeding in Drosophila subobscura," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 289-295.
    2. Richard Buchholz, 2004. "Effects of parasitic infection on mate sampling by female wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo): should infected females be more or less choosy?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 687-694, July.
    3. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.
    4. Timo Thünken & Sebastian A. Baldauf & Harald Kullmann & Julia Schuld & Saskia Hesse & Theo C.M. Bakker, 2011. "Size-related inbreeding preference and competitiveness in male Pelvicachromis taeniatus (Cichlidae)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 358-362.
    5. Heidi S. Fisher & Gil G. Rosenthal, 2006. "Hungry females show stronger mating preferences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 979-981, November.
    6. Joseph L. Woodgate & Stefan Leitner & Clive K. Catchpole & Mathew L. Berg & Andrew T.D. Bennett & Katherine L. Buchanan, 2011. "Developmental stressors that impair song learning in males do not appear to affect female preferences for song complexity in the zebra finch," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 566-573.
    7. Rebecca J Fox & Ellen E Gearing & Michael D Jennions & Megan L Head, 2019. "Variation in the condition-dependence of individual sexual traits in male eastern mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(3), pages 666-674.
    8. Richard N.C. Milner & Tanya Detto & Michael D. Jennions & Patricia R.Y. Backwell, 2010. "Experimental evidence for a seasonal shift in the strength of a female mating preference," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 311-316.
    9. Satoshi Wada & Yuusei Arashiro & Fumio Takeshita & Yasutoki Shibata, 2011. "Male mate choice in hermit crabs: prudence by inferior males and simple preference by superior males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 114-119.
    10. James J. Muraco & Andrea S. Aspbury & Caitlin R. Gabor, 2014. "Does male behavioral type correlate with species recognition and stress?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 200-205.
    11. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    12. Reuven Dukas & Carling M. Baxter, 2014. "Mate choosiness in young male fruit flies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 549-552.
    13. Justin G. Cally & Devi Stuart-Fox & Luke Holman, 2019. "Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Seth W. Coleman & Gail L. Patricelli & Gerald Borgia, 2004. "Variable female preferences drive complex male displays," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6984), pages 742-745, April.
    15. Katja U. Heubel & Ingo Schlupp, 2008. "Seasonal plasticity in male mating preferences in sailfin mollies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1080-1086.
    16. Constantinos I. Michaelidis & Kristian C. Demary & Sara M. Lewis, 2006. "Male courtship signals and female signal assessment in Photinus greeni fireflies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 329-335, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erika Fernlund Isaksson & Charel Reuland & Ariel F Kahrl & Alessandro Devigili & John L Fitzpatrick, 2022. "Resource-dependent investment in male sexual traits in a viviparous fish [Body size and its effect on male-male competition in Hylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae)]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(5), pages 954-966.
    2. Andrew T. Kahn & Tegan Dolstra & Michael D. Jennions & Patricia R.Y. Backwell, 2013. "Strategic male courtship effort varies in concert with adaptive shifts in female mating preferences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 906-913.
    3. E.H. DuVal & J.A. Kapoor, 2015. "Causes and consequences of variation in female mate search investment in a lekking bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1537-1547.
    4. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jonas Schmidt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2020. "Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 499-518, May.
    8. Mario Herberz & Tobias Brosch & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2020. "Kilo what? Default units increase value sensitivity in joint evaluations of energy efficiency," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 972-988, November.
    9. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    10. Augusteijn, Hilde Elisabeth Maria & van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., 2021. "Posterior Probabilities of Effect Sizes and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis: An Intuitive Approach of Dealing with Publication Bias," OSF Preprints avkgj, Center for Open Science.
    11. Georgiou, George K. & Guo, Kan & Naveenkumar, Nithya & Vieira, Ana Paula Alves & Das, J.P., 2020. "PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Stephan Kambach & Ingolf Kühn & Bastien Castagneyrol & Helge Bruelheide, 2016. "The Impact of Tree Diversity on Different Aspects of Insect Herbivory along a Global Temperature Gradient - A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Nan Wang & Yuxiang Luan & Rui Ma, 2024. "Detecting causal relationships between work motivation and job performance: a meta-analytic review of cross-lagged studies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:234-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. de la Cruz, Vera Ysabel V. & Tantriani, & Cheng, Weiguo & Tawaraya, Keitaro, 2023. "Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Kelly R Moran & Sara Y Del Valle, 2016. "A Meta-Analysis of the Association between Gender and Protective Behaviors in Response to Respiratory Epidemics and Pandemics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Cyrielle Maroteau & Antonio Espuela-Ortiz & Esther Herrera-Luis & Sundararajan Srinivasan & Fiona Carr & Roger Tavendale & Karen Wilson & Natalia Hernandez-Pacheco & James D Chalmers & Steve Turner & , 2021. "LTA4H rs2660845 association with montelukast response in early and late-onset asthma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Barne Willie & Emma L. Sweeney & Steven G. Badman & Mark Chatfield & Andrew J. Vallely & Angela Kelly-Hanku & David M. Whiley, 2022. "The Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Papua New Guinea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    19. Larney, Andrea & Rotella, Amanda & Barclay, Pat, 2019. "Stake size effects in ultimatum game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 61-72.
    20. Blum, Diego & Holling, Heinz, 2017. "Spearman's law of diminishing returns. A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 60-66.
    21. Stephanie Medlock & Juliette L Parlevliet & Danielle Sent & Saeid Eslami & Marjan Askari & Derk L Arts & Joost B Hoekstra & Sophia E de Rooij & Ameen Abu-Hanna, 2017. "An email-based intervention to improve the number and timeliness of letters sent from the hospital outpatient clinic to the general practitioner: A pair-randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    22. Chin Lin & Hsiang-Cheng Chen & Wen-Hui Fang & Chih-Chien Wang & Yi-Jen Peng & Herng-Sheng Lee & Hung Chang & Chi-Ming Chu & Guo-Shu Huang & Wei-Teing Chen & Yu-Jui Tsai & Hong-Ling Lin & Fu-Huang Lin , 2016. "Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:197-209.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.