IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p509-519..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance

Author

Listed:
  • Fangyuan Hua
  • Kathryn E. Sieving
  • Robert J. Fletcher
  • Chloe A. Wright

Abstract

Predation risk can inflict profound effects on prey by influencing prey behavior and other traits. Prey are often subjected to a diversity of predators, which can exert differential predation pressures on prey life-history strategies. In birds, breeding adults and offspring (as eggs, nestlings, and fledglings) are susceptible to different types of predators, and life-history theory predicts that breeding birds can adjust to adult versus offspring predation risk differentially via allocation of breeding investment. Here, we experimentally tested for the effects of perceived adult versus offspring predation risk on breeding birds’ reproductive strategy and performance. On study plots with nest boxes used by the cavity-nesting Eastern bluebird Sialia sialis, we manipulated vocal cues of 3 avian predators that preferentially prey on either bluebird adults, or offspring, or both. We found that 1) increased perception of predation risk by all predator treatments reduced bluebird parental investment in egg production and/or post-egg nesting performance, and 2) increased perception of adult and offspring predation risks affected bluebirds differentially, with bluebirds exhibiting shorter nestling rearing periods under offspring, but not adult, predation risk. Our results provide experimental evidence for the nonconsumptive effects of predation risk on avian breeding behavior that can influence demographic vital rates and highlight the mechanisms by which breeding birds can adjust reproductive strategies under different predation risk situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangyuan Hua & Kathryn E. Sieving & Robert J. Fletcher & Chloe A. Wright, 2014. "Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 509-519.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:509-519.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Pan, 2001. "Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 120-125, March.
    2. Christopher N. Templeton & Walter M. Shriner, 2004. "Multiple selection pressures influence Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) antipredator behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 673-678, July.
    3. Nicole A. Schneider & Michael Griesser, 2013. "Incubating females use dynamic risk assessment to evaluate the risk posed by different predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 47-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiwari, Vandana & Tripathi, Jai Prakash & Mishra, Swati & Upadhyay, Ranjit Kumar, 2020. "Modeling the fear effect and stability of non-equilibrium patterns in mutually interfering predator–prey systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    2. Kumbhakar, Ruma & Hossain, Mainul & Pal, Nikhil, 2024. "Dynamics of a two-prey one-predator model with fear and group defense: A study in parameter planes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Hossain, Mainul & Pal, Nikhil & Samanta, Sudip, 2020. "Impact of fear on an eco-epidemiological model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Nirapada Santra & Sudeshna Mondal & Guruprasad Samanta, 2022. "Complex Dynamics of a Predator–Prey Interaction with Fear Effect in Deterministic and Fluctuating Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Sahu, S.R. & Raw, S.N., 2023. "Appearance of chaos and bi-stability in a fear induced delayed predator–prey system: A mathematical modeling study," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    6. Shang, Zuchong & Qiao, Yuanhua, 2024. "Complex dynamics of a four-species food web model with nonlinear top predator harvesting and fear effect," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 458-484.
    7. Banamali Maji & Samares Pal, 2022. "Impact of fear effect exerted by Pterois volitans on a coral reef ecosystem with parrotfish refuge and harvesting of both fishes," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2267-2287, February.
    8. Kimberley J. Mathot & Josue David Arteaga-Torres & Anne Besson & Deborah M. Hawkshaw & Natasha Klappstein & Rebekah A. McKinnon & Sheeraja Sridharan & Shinichi Nakagawa, 2024. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of unimodal and multimodal predation risk assessment in birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Kaur, Rajinder Pal & Sharma, Amit & Sharma, Anuj Kumar, 2021. "Impact of fear effect on plankton-fish system dynamics incorporating zooplankton refuge," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Panday, Pijush & Samanta, Sudip & Pal, Nikhil & Chattopadhyay, Joydev, 2020. "Delay induced multiple stability switch and chaos in a predator–prey model with fear effect," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-158.
    11. Umrao, Anuj Kumar & Roy, Subarna & Tiwari, Pankaj Kumar & Srivastava, Prashant K., 2024. "Dynamical behaviors of autonomous and nonautonomous models of generalist predator–prey system with fear, mutual interference and nonlinear harvesting," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Liu, Junli & Liu, Bairu & Lv, Pan & Zhang, Tailei, 2021. "An eco-epidemiological model with fear effect and hunting cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Pan, 2001. "Model Selection in Estimating Equations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 529-534, June.
    2. Vens, Maren & Ziegler, Andreas, 2012. "Generalized estimating equations and regression diagnostics for longitudinal controlled clinical trials: A case study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1232-1242.
    3. Michael S. Rendall & Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar & Margaret M. Weden & Zafar Nazarov, 2011. "Multiple Imputation for Combined-Survey Estimation With Incomplete Regressors In One But Not Both Surveys," Working Papers WR-887-1, RAND Corporation.
    4. Katrina N. Burns & Kan Sun & Julius N. Fobil & Richard L. Neitzel, 2016. "Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Song Guo & Feng Ling & Juan Hou & Jinna Wang & Guiming Fu & Zhenyu Gong, 2014. "Mosquito Surveillance Revealed Lagged Effects of Mosquito Abundance on Mosquito-Borne Disease Transmission: A Retrospective Study in Zhejiang, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.
    6. Marc-Andreas Muendler & Sascha O. Becker, 2010. "Margins of Multinational Labor Substitution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1999-2030, December.
    7. Laura Neumeyer & Anna Gründler & Anna-Luisa Stöber, 2023. "Don’t Worry, Be Happy—Does the CEO’s Personality Mitigate the Negative Effect of Financial Constraints on Employee Satisfaction?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 71-98, March.
    8. Amy Hinsley & William J Sutherland & Alison Johnston, 2017. "Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Geraldo F Oliveira & Teresinha R R Oliveira & Adauto T Ikejiri & Mariela P Andraus & Tais F Galvao & Marcus T Silva & Maurício G Pereira, 2014. "Prevalence of Hypertension and Associated Factors in an Indigenous Community of Central Brazil: A Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, January.
    10. Li, Gaorong & Lian, Heng & Feng, Sanying & Zhu, Lixing, 2013. "Automatic variable selection for longitudinal generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 174-186.
    11. Beth A. Reboussin & Edward H. Ip & Mark Wolfson, 2008. "Locally dependent latent class models with covariates: an application to under‐age drinking in the USA," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(4), pages 877-897, October.
    12. Peng, Cheng & Yang, Yihe & Zhou, Jie & Pan, Jianxin, 2022. "Latent Gaussian copula models for longitudinal binary data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Mark Rooij, 2018. "Transitional modeling of experimental longitudinal data with missing values," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(1), pages 107-130, March.
    14. Tessa Recendes & Federico Aime & Aaron D. Hill & Oleg V. Petrenko, 2022. "Bargaining your way to success: The effect of Machiavellian chief executive officers on firm costs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(10), pages 2012-2041, October.
    15. Bastian Rake, 2017. "Determinants of pharmaceutical innovation: the role of technological opportunities revisited," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 691-727, September.
    16. Muhammad Adeel & Hung-Chou Chen & Bor-Shing Lin & Chien-Hung Lai & Chun-Wei Wu & Jiunn-Horng Kang & Jian-Chiun Liou & Chih-Wei Peng, 2022. "Oxygen Consumption (VO 2 ) and Surface Electromyography (sEMG) during Moderate-Strength Training Exercises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Aristides dos Santos, Anderson Moreira & Perelman, Julian & Jacinto, Paulo de Andrade & Tejada, Cesar Augusto Oviedo & Barros, Aluísio J.D. & Bertoldi, Andréa D. & Matijasevich, Alicia & Santos, Iná S, 2019. "Income-related inequality and inequity in children’s health care: A longitudinal analysis using data from Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 127-137.
    18. Fischer, Caroline & Schott, Carina, 2020. "Why People Enter and Stay in Public Service Careers: The Role of Parental Socialization and an Interest in Politics," OSF Preprints yb8e3, Center for Open Science.
    19. Yuvraj Sunecher & Naushad Mamode Khan & Miroslav M. Ristić & Vandna Jowaheer, 2019. "BINAR(1) negative binomial model for bivariate non-stationary time series with different over-dispersion indices," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(4), pages 625-653, December.
    20. Irina Chis Ster & Hamzah F Niaz & Martha E Chico & Yisela Oviedo & Maritza Vaca & Philip J Cooper, 2021. "The epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminth infections in children up to 8 years of age: Findings from an Ecuadorian birth cohort," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:509-519.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.