IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p47-52..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incubating females use dynamic risk assessment to evaluate the risk posed by different predators

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole A. Schneider
  • Michael Griesser

Abstract

Uncertainty poses a substantial problem for animals, making it is essential for individuals to anticipate changes in their environment to select suitable behavioral strategies. In nest-building species where parents care for dependent young, predation is a major cause of reproductive failure. However, because parents generally have inadequate information about nest predation risks, attaining information about predation hazards increases their likelihood of making informed, optimal decisions. Risk assessment should therefore be widespread, particularly in incubating parents of species that breed in cavities or closed nests, which have limited information about predator presence. This study experimentally investigated the dynamic risk assessment in incubating female brown thornbill (Acanthiza pusilla), a long-lived Australian passerine, which builds closed dome nests in dense vegetation. When the females were exposed to the calls of a nest predator, a predator of adults, and a nonpredatory species, they reacted most strongly to the predator of adults’ calls, by looking out of the nest for longest. Females significantly increased their level of alertness on hearing calls of both predator species and maintained their higher level of alertness after the simulated predator presence ended. Females in nests with a high degree of visual cover, and therefore a larger information deficit, reacted more strongly to predator calls than females in more open nests. Moreover, poorly concealed nests had a higher probability of being predated. These results show that incubating female thornbills use dynamic risk assessment and base their response on who is at risk and the degree of information deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole A. Schneider & Michael Griesser, 2013. "Incubating females use dynamic risk assessment to evaluate the risk posed by different predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 47-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:47-52.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Griesser & Magdalena Nystrand, 2009. "Vigilance and predation of a forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 709-715.
    2. Sönke Eggers & Michael Griesser & Jan Ekman, 2008. "Predator-induced reductions in nest visitation rates are modified by forest cover and food availability," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 1056-1062.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fangyuan Hua & Kathryn E. Sieving & Robert J. Fletcher & Chloe A. Wright, 2014. "Increased perception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avian reproductive strategy and performance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 509-519.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandra Basso & Michael Coslovsky & Heinz Richner, 2014. "Parasite- and predator-induced maternal effects in the great tit (Parus major)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1105-1114.
    2. Isaac Gravolin & Topi K Lehtonen & Nicholas D S Deal & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B M Wong, 2021. "Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1163-1170.
    3. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    4. Max Radvan & Anthony R Rendall & Michael A Weston, 2023. "The habitat connectivity hypothesis of escape in urban woodland birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 297-305.
    5. Savannah L Bartel & John C Kilgo, 2023. "White-tailed deer responses to acoustic predator cues are contingent upon past land use and contemporary fire regime," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 1013-1022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:47-52.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.