IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2023i61p110-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental management from the point of energy transition: The example of the Rybinsk reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Nekrasov, S.

    (Central Economics and Mathematics Institute RAS (CEMI RAS), Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The transfer of the currently emerging international practice of solving the problem of global warming to Russia will lead to an increase in energy supply costs. The result of CO2 absorption projects at thermal power plants will be a 120-230% increase in the cost of electricity produced by them, which will have a negative impact on socio-economic development. The absorption of carbon dioxide from exhaust gases in industry and energy is a capital-intensive and energy-consuming process. An alternative to preventing an increase in the cost of energy supply for the Russian Federation is to reduce the negative anthropogenic impact by using its natural potential. The increase in the annual absorption of carbon dioxide by Russian forests, which happened over 30 years, is comparable to its current emissions in thermal power engineering and heat supply. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the need to change the methodology for solving the problem of transition to carbon-free energy. In contrast to the transfer into Russia the projects tested in the West for the absorption of CO2 of exhaust gases from industry and energy sector, one should be based on a systematic approach to carbon dioxide sequestration using opportunities that have not yet been implemented. Using the example of a study of environmental management in the area of the Rybinsk reservoir, the existence of a more effective solution for reducing CO2 content is shown in comparison with projects implemented in Western countries. Due to the growth of the power system capacity, which is ahead of electricity consumption, the importance of electricity generation at the Rybinsk HPP (hydro power plant) has significantly decreased. Payments for the utilization of greenhouse gases due to reforestation will be at least 15 times higher than the decrease in the HPP's revenue due to a change of reservoir level. Due to the restoration of forests in part of the reservoir area, it is possible to ensure the sequestration of 1.5 million tons of CO2 per year, which is equivalent to the implementation of projects to capture CO2 of exhaust gases at gas-fired power plants with a capacity of at least 0.92 MW.

Suggested Citation

  • Nekrasov, S., 2023. "Environmental management from the point of energy transition: The example of the Rybinsk reservoir," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 110-126.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:61:p:110-126
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2023_4_110-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2023-61-110-126r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2023_4_110-126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon L. Lewis & Charlotte E. Wheeler & Edward T. A. Mitchard & Alexander Koch, 2019. "Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7750), pages 25-28, April.
    2. Kim, Youngmin & Jang, Hochang & Kim, Junggyun & Lee, Jeonghwan, 2017. "Prediction of storage efficiency on CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers using artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 916-928.
    3. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    4. S. A. Nekrasov, 2021. "Tools of the Technocenosis Theory for Forecasting Electricity Consumption in Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 263-273, May.
    5. S. A. Nekrasov & I. D. Grachev, 2020. "Renewable Energy: Prospects for Energy Development Correction in Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 71-78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Candie & Liu, Jingyong & Zhang, Xiaochun & Xie, Wuming & Sun, Jian & Chang, Kenlin & Kuo, Jiahong & Xie, Wenhao & Liu, Chao & Sun, Shuiyu & Buyukada, Musa & Evrendilek, Fatih, 2018. "Co-combustion thermal conversion characteristics of textile dyeing sludge and pomelo peel using TGA and artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 786-795.
    2. Yurii Vasilev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Anna Tsvetkova & Nadejda Komendantova, 2021. "Promoting Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in the Russian Federation: A System of Educational Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Nina Tiel & Fabian Fopp & Philipp Brun & Johan Hoogen & Dirk Nikolaus Karger & Cecilia M. Casadei & Lisha Lyu & Devis Tuia & Niklaus E. Zimmermann & Thomas W. Crowther & Loïc Pellissier, 2024. "Regional uniqueness of tree species composition and response to forest loss and climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. You, Junyu & Ampomah, William & Sun, Qian, 2020. "Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    6. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Suleman & Ihtishamul Haq & Syed Asad Jamal, 2018. "Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 998-1031, December.
    7. Kamal Jawher Khudaida & Diganta Bhusan Das, 2020. "A Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Supercritical CO 2 Injection on CO 2 Storage Capacities of Geological Formations," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Turgay Ertekin & Qian Sun, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Reservoir Engineering: A Status Check," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Can Ding & Yiyuan Zhou & Qingchang Ding & Kaiming Li, 2022. "Integrated Carbon-Capture-Based Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch of Power Systems Based on EEMD-LSTM-SVR Wind Power Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Kai Cheng & Haitao Yang & Shengli Tao & Yanjun Su & Hongcan Guan & Yu Ren & Tianyu Hu & Wenkai Li & Guangcai Xu & Mengxi Chen & Xiancheng Lu & Zekun Yang & Yanhong Tang & Keping Ma & Jingyun Fang & Qi, 2024. "Carbon storage through China’s planted forest expansion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Danchen Liang & Ganlin Huang, 2023. "Influence of Urban Tree Traits on Their Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Dai, Zhenxue & Zhang, Ye & Bielicki, Jeffrey & Amooie, Mohammad Amin & Zhang, Mingkan & Yang, Changbing & Zou, Youqin & Ampomah, William & Xiao, Ting & Jia, Wei & Middleton, Richard & Zhang, Wen & Sun, 2018. "Heterogeneity-assisted carbon dioxide storage in marine sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 876-883.
    14. Jia Yen Lai & Lock Hei Ngu & Siti Salwa Hashim, 2021. "A review of CO2 adsorbents performance for different carbon capture technology processes conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 1076-1117, October.
    15. Claudia Cristina Sanchez Moore & Luiz Kulay, 2019. "Effect of the Implementation of Carbon Capture Systems on the Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance of the Brazilian Electricity Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Costa, Alexis & Coppitters, Diederik & Dubois, Lionel & Contino, Francesco & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2024. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    17. Tiphaine Chevallier & Maud Loireau & Romain Courault & lydie chapuis-lardy & Thierry Desjardins & Cécile Gomez & Alexandre Grondin & Frédéric Guérin & Didier Orange & Raphaël Pélissier & Georges Serpa, 2020. "Paris climate agreement: Promoting interdisciplinary science and stakeholders' approaches for multi-scale implementation of continental carbon sequestration," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312984, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Benzeev, Rayna & Wiens, Ashton & Piotto, Daniel & Newton, Peter, 2023. "Property size and forest cover were key determinants of forest restoration in Southern Bahia in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    20. A. G. Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Enas Taha Sayed & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Hussein M. Maghrabie & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2022. "Prospect of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Technology and Its Impact on the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-38, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; reforestation; renewable energy sources; clean electricity production; hydropower;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
    • P42 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2023:i:61:p:110-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.