IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v357y2024ics0306261923017956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Alexis
  • Coppitters, Diederik
  • Dubois, Lionel
  • Contino, Francesco
  • Thomas, Diane
  • De Weireld, Guy

Abstract

The carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) process chain is subject to increasing interest, and its overwhelming implementation on the industrial scale appears to be one of the main ways to reduce CO2 emissions. In this context, the optimisation of a CO2 purification process for oxy-combustion cement plant flue gases is proposed. This optimisation is based on a multidimensional study on the energy, exergy, economy, and environmental impacts of the process. The results of the optimisations carried out show that it is more favourable to increase the CO2 recovery above 90%, from an energy, exergy and economic point of view. The analysis of the evolution of the capture cost as a function of the CO2 recovery shows that for a given carbon tax, there is a minimum for the total cost which includes the sum of the carbon tax contributions for the uncaptured CO2 and the capture cost. As the unit uses only electrical energy, the cost and the electricity generation will directly impact the capture cost as well as the overall balance in terms of CO2 avoided. As the electricity price increases from 50 to 250 €/MWh, the CO2 capture cost increases by almost 250%. An analysis of the parameter uncertainties allows to observe their impacts on the results, and to define a standard deviation from the optimised points and show the robustness of these. Considering the technical parametric uncertainties, the standard deviation on the electrical consumption (3.65 kWh/tCO2), CO2 recovery (0.09%) and exergy efficiency (0.92%) is limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Alexis & Coppitters, Diederik & Dubois, Lionel & Contino, Francesco & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2024. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of a cryogenic carbon purification unit with membrane for oxyfuel cement plant flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:357:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017956
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923017956
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaroslaw Krzywanski & Waqar Muhammad Ashraf & Tomasz Czakiert & Marcin Sosnowski & Karolina Grabowska & Anna Zylka & Anna Kulakowska & Dorian Skrobek & Sandra Mistal & Yunfei Gao, 2022. "CO 2 Capture by Virgin Ivy Plants Growing Up on the External Covers of Houses as a Rapid Complementary Route to Achieve Global GHG Reduction Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Rivero, R. & Garfias, M., 2006. "Standard chemical exergy of elements updated," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3310-3326.
    3. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Szargut, Jan, 1989. "Chemical exergies of the elements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 269-286.
    5. Mari Voldsund & Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir & Edoardo De Lena & José-Francisco Pérez-Calvo & Armin Jamali & David Berstad & Chao Fu & Matteo Romano & Simon Roussanaly & Rahul Anantharaman & Helmut Hopp, 2019. "Comparison of Technologies for CO 2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 1: Technical Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, February.
    6. Hu, Yukun & Yan, Jinyue, 2012. "Characterization of flue gas in oxy-coal combustion processes for CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 113-121.
    7. Yimin Deng & Renaud Ansart & Jan Baeyens & Huili Zhang, 2019. "Flue Gas Desulphurization in Circulating Fluidized Beds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    9. Ghannadzadeh, Ali & Thery-Hetreux, Raphaële & Baudouin, Olivier & Baudet, Philippe & Floquet, Pascal & Joulia, Xavier, 2012. "General methodology for exergy balance in ProSimPlus® process simulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 38-59.
    10. Ben-Mansour, R. & Habib, M.A. & Bamidele, O.E. & Basha, M. & Qasem, N.A.A. & Peedikakkal, A. & Laoui, T. & Ali, M., 2016. "Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 225-255.
    11. Coppitters, Diederik & Verleysen, Kevin & De Paepe, Ward & Contino, Francesco, 2022. "How can renewable hydrogen compete with diesel in public transport? Robust design optimization of a hydrogen refueling station under techno-economic and environmental uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    12. Deng, Zhongwei & Hu, Xiaosong & Lin, Xianke & Che, Yunhong & Xu, Le & Guo, Wenchao, 2020. "Data-driven state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery packs based on Gaussian process regression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Jin, Bo & Zhao, Haibo & Zheng, Chuguang, 2015. "Optimization and control for CO2 compression and purification unit in oxy-combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 416-430.
    14. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    15. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    16. Xavier Rixhon & Gauthier Limpens & Diederik Coppitters & Hervé Jeanmart & Francesco Contino, 2021. "The Role of Electrofuels under Uncertainties for the Belgian Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Coppitters, Diederik & De Paepe, Ward & Contino, Francesco, 2021. "Robust design optimization of a photovoltaic-battery-heat pump system with thermal storage under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong, 2014. "Exergy analysis and the energy saving mechanism for coal to synthetic/substitute natural gas and power cogeneration system without and with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-561.
    2. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Nur Syahirah Mohamed Hatta & Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua & Farihahusnah Hussin & Lai Ti Gew, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Amino Acid-Based Adsorbents for CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-34, May.
    4. Wu, Junnian & Pu, Guangying & Guo, Yan & Lv, Jingwen & Shang, Jiangwei, 2018. "Retrospective and prospective assessment of exergy, life cycle carbon emissions, and water footprint for coking network evolution in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 479-493.
    5. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Khalili-Garakani, Amirhossein & Ivakpour, Javad & Kasiri, Norollah, 2016. "Evolutionary synthesis of optimum light ends recovery unit with exergy analysis application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 507-522.
    7. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Wang, Ke & Zhou, Zhongyun & Zhao, Pengfei & Yin, Zeguang & Su, Zhen & Sun, Ji, 2017. "Molten sodium-fluoride-promoted high-performance Li4SiO4-based CO2 sorbents at low CO2 concentrations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 403-412.
    9. Gustafsson, Marcus & Cordova, Stephanie S. & Svensson, Niclas & Eklund, Mats, 2024. "Climate performance of liquefied biomethane with carbon dioxide utilization or storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Gollangi, Raju & K, NagamalleswaraRao, 2022. "Energy, exergy analysis of conceptually designed monochloromethane production process from hydrochlorination of methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    11. Xu, Ming-Xin & Wu, Hai-Bo & Wu, Ya-Chang & Wang, Han-Xiao & Ouyang, Hao-Dong & Lu, Qiang, 2021. "Design and evaluation of a novel system for the flue gas compression and purification from the oxy-fuel combustion process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. de Kleijne, Kiane & James, Jebin & Hanssen, Steef V. & van Zelm, Rosalie, 2020. "Environmental benefits of urea production from basic oxygen furnace gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Li, Hongwei & Tang, Zhigang & Li, Na & Cui, Longpeng & Mao, Xian-zhong, 2020. "Mechanism and process study on steel slag enhancement for CO2 capture by seawater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Brigagão, George Victor & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Carbon dioxide management via exergy-based sustainability assessment: Carbon Capture and Storage versus conversion to methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 720-732.
    15. Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls, 2020. "Use of exergy efficiency for the optimization of LNG processes with NGL extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Yan, Shuren & Zhu, Ding & Zhang, Zhiyong & Li, Hai & Chen, Guangjin & Liu, Bei, 2019. "A pilot-scale experimental study on CO2 capture using Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 slurry under normal pressure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 104-114.
    17. Petar Sabev Varbanov & Hon Huin Chin & Alexandra-Elena Plesu Popescu & Stanislav Boldyryev, 2020. "Thermodynamics-Based Process Sustainability Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Simoni, Marco & Wilkes, Mathew D. & Brown, Solomon & Provis, John L. & Kinoshita, Hajime & Hanein, Theodore, 2022. "Decarbonising the lime industry: State-of-the-art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. A. G. Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Enas Taha Sayed & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Hussein M. Maghrabie & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2022. "Prospect of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Technology and Its Impact on the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-38, November.
    20. Choe, Changgwon & Haider, Junaid & Lim, Hankwon, 2023. "Carbon capture and liquefaction from methane steam reforming unit: 4E’s analysis (Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:357:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.