IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jeijnl/v3y2017i1p214235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From a Student of Startup Business to a Startup Employee or Entrepreneur: Study on Career Narratives of Students in Entrepreneurial Programs in a University

Author

Listed:
  • Juha Saukkonen

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to gain an understanding of the incidents, relationships and processes that support entrepreneurial students to become employees and entrepreneurs. Through a qualitative approach based on career history and projections written by the respondents, this study aims to shed light on the process of becoming an entrepreneur or employed by an entrepreneurial organization. Pedagogical and professional issues that may foster the development of these practices eventually leading to employment and entrepreneurial activities are posed.

Suggested Citation

  • Juha Saukkonen, 2017. "From a Student of Startup Business to a Startup Employee or Entrepreneur: Study on Career Narratives of Students in Entrepreneurial Programs in a University," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 214235-2142, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:214235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/download/11117/9139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/view/11117
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Levie & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein, 2010. "A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 317-350, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ammar Hussain & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Ahsan Akbar & Mirela Panait & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "When Does Earnings Management Matter? Evidence across the Corporate Life Cycle for Non-Financial Chinese Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    3. repec:zbw:inwedp:692017 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. D’Angelo, Alfredo & Buck, Trevor, 2019. "The earliness of exporting and creeping sclerosis? The moderating effects of firm age, size and centralization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 428-437.
    5. Sumita Sarma & Sunny Li Sun, 2017. "The genesis of fabless business model: Institutional entrepreneurs in an adaptive ecosystem," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 587-617, September.
    6. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 3-18, March.
    7. Per Davidsson & Jan Henrik Gruenhagen, 2021. "Fulfilling the Process Promise: A Review and Agenda for New Venture Creation Process Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1083-1118, September.
    8. François Meyssonnier, 2015. "Quel contrôle de gestion pour les startups ?," Working Papers hal-01116382, HAL.
    9. Wilson, Kathleen Bridget & Karg, Adam & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2022. "Prospecting non-fungible tokens in the digital economy: Stakeholders and ecosystem, risk and opportunity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 657-670.
    10. Czarnecki Maciej & Starosta Anna, 2014. "Two Faces of Anti-crisis Management: from Definitions to Concepts," Management, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Anne Domurath & Simon Taggar & Holger Patzelt, 2023. "A contingency model of employees’ turnover intent in young ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 901-927, March.
    12. Catherine Welch & Niina Nummela & Peter Liesch, 2016. "The Internationalization Process Model Revisited: An Agenda for Future Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 783-804, December.
    13. Maksim Malyy & Zeljko Tekic & Tatiana Podladchikova, 2021. "The value of big data for analyzing growth dynamics of technology based new ventures," Papers 2104.03053, arXiv.org.
    14. Claire Leitch & Frances Hill & Helle Neergaard, 2010. "Entrepreneurial and Business Growth and the Quest for a “Comprehensive Theory†: Tilting at Windmills?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 249-260, March.
    15. Yashar Mansoori & Martin Lackéus, 2020. "Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 791-818, March.
    16. Cyron, Thomas & Zoellick, Jan Cornelius, 2018. "Business Development in Post-Growth Economies: Challenging Assumptions in the Existing Business Growth Literature," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(3), pages 206-229.
    17. Hundera, Mulu, 2019. "Role conflict, coping strategies and female entrepreneurial success in sub-Saharan Africa," Other publications TiSEM 3e263b0c-3bf3-474a-8a20-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Alex Coad, 2022. "Lumps, Bumps and Jumps in the Firm Growth Process," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 18(4), pages 212-267, April.
    19. Malyy, Maksim & Tekic, Zeljko & Podladchikova, Tatiana, 2021. "The value of big data for analyzing growth dynamics of technology-based new ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Gilles Guieu & Franck Tannery & Léo-Paul Dana, 2014. "Au-delà de la croissance rapide : combiner le paradoxe et la logique dominante pour un modèle d’hypercroissance durable," Post-Print halshs-01413739, HAL.
    21. Matejun Marek & Mikoláš Zdeněk, 2017. "Small business life cycle: statics and dynamics (S&D) model," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 48-58, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:214235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.