IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v10y2022i2p13-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Smart Production, Gross Income, and Downstream Risk Characterization of Rice Farmers in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Shaibu Baanni Azumah
  • Abraham Zakaria
  • Rosaine N. Yegbemey
  • Philips A. Apalogta
  • Vishal Dagar
  • Abass Mahama

Abstract

Purpose - Climate smart production is a potential solution to the negative effects of the changing climatic conditions on agricultural production systems in Africa in general, and particularly in Ghana.Design/methodology/approach - In this study, we employed a Multinomial Treatment Effect (MTE) regression model, using primary data collected from 543 rice farmers in Ghana, to examine the drivers of single and joint adoption of selected Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices (i.e., improved rice varieties and irrigation). The study further explored the implications of the adoption of CSA practices on gross income and reduction of risk (skewness of rice yield) faced by rice farmers.Findings - The empirical results show that education, experience, and extension service significantly influenced joint adoption of irrigation and improved rice varieties positively; while livestock ownership, farm size, and social capital significantly influenced joint adoption negatively. In addition, single adoption of improved rice varieties and irrigation as well as joint adoption significantly influenced rice farmers’ income and risk exposure positively. Education, rice commercialization, experience, and social capital also bore significant positive relationships with income and rice farmers’ risk exposure, while quantity of fertilizer applied per acre and farm size significantly influenced income and rice farmers’ risk exposure negatively.Research limitations/implications - There exists a pool of literature on climate smart agriculture technology adoption among rice farmers. However, these studies do not highlight the nexus between the adoption of climate smart technology and its implications on gross income and risk characterization of rice farmers.Practical implications - The adoption of climate smart production mechanisms like the use of improved rice varieties and irrigation should be encouraged among rice farmers since they have the potential to increase gross income while reducing farmers’ exposure to risk in the face of climate change.Social implications - Policymakers and project implementers should give priority to socioeconomic and institutional factors that promote the adoption of CSA practices among rice farmers in programming of development interventions.Originality/value - The study examined the factors that drive rice farmers to adopt improved rice varieties and irrigation, as well as joint adoption of improved rice varieties + irrigation in northern Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaibu Baanni Azumah & Abraham Zakaria & Rosaine N. Yegbemey & Philips A. Apalogta & Vishal Dagar & Abass Mahama, 2022. "Climate Smart Production, Gross Income, and Downstream Risk Characterization of Rice Farmers in Ghana," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 13-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:13-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/19495/15133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/19495
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cattaneo, Matias D., 2010. "Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 138-154, April.
    2. Zakaria, Abraham & Azumah, Shaibu Baanni & Appiah-Twumasi, Mark & Dagunga, Gilbert, 2020. "Adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices among farm households in Ghana: The role of farmer participation in training programmes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Matias D. Cattaneo, 2010. "multi-valued treatment effects," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Md Kamrul Hasan & Sam Desiere & Marijke D’Haese & Lalit Kumar, 2018. "Impact of climate-smart agriculture adoption on the food security of coastal farmers in Bangladesh," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 1073-1088, August.
    5. Bola Amoke Awotide & Aziz A. Karimov & Aliou Diagne, 2016. "Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
    7. Emmanuel Donkor & Nicolette Matthews & Abiodun A. Ogundeji, 2018. "Efficiency of Rice Farming in Ghana: Policy Implications for Rice Sector Development," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 149-161, June.
    8. World Bank, 2011. "Increased Productivity and Food Security, Enhanced Resilience and Reduced Carbon Emissions for Sustainable Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 27395, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
    2. Stojčić, Nebojša, 2021. "Social and private outcomes of green innovation incentives in European advancing economies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "A double machine learning approach to estimate the effects of musical practice on student’s skills," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 282-300, January.
    4. W K Newey & S Stouli, 2022. "Heterogeneous coefficients, control variables and identification of multiple treatment effects [Multivalued treatments and decomposition analysis: An application to the WIA program]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(3), pages 865-872.
    5. Carlos A. Flores & Oscar A. Mitnik, 2009. "Evaluating Nonexperimental Estimators for Multiple Treatments: Evidence from Experimental Data," Working Papers 2010-10, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    6. Firpo, Sergio Pinheiro & Pinto, Rafael de Carvalho Cayres, 2012. "Combining Strategies for the Estimation of Treatment Effects," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 32(1), March.
    7. Frölich, Markus & Huber, Martin & Wiesenfarth, Manuel, 2017. "The finite sample performance of semi- and non-parametric estimators for treatment effects and policy evaluation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 91-102.
    8. Wei Huang & Oliver Linton & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A Unified Framework for Specification Tests of Continuous Treatment Effect Models," Papers 2102.08063, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    9. Ying-Ying Lee, 2015. "Efficient propensity score regression estimators of multi-valued treatment effects for the treated," Economics Series Working Papers 738, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Abdul-Hanan Abdallah & Awal Abdul-Rahaman & Gazali Issahaku, 2021. "Sustainable agricultural practices, farm income and food security among rural households in Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17668-17701, December.
    11. Tristan Le Cotty & Elodie Maître d'Hôtel & Julie Subervie, 2019. "Inventory credit to enhance food security in Africa," Working Papers hal-02018715, HAL.
    12. Gorman, Emma & Harmon, Colm & Mendolia, Silvia & Staneva, Anita & Walker, Ian, 2019. "The Causal Effects of Adolescent School Bullying Victimisation on Later Life Outcomes," Working Papers 2019-05, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    13. Benin, Samuel, 2016. "Impacts of CAADP on Africa’s agricultural-led development:," IFPRI discussion papers 1553, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Daniel Morales Martínez & Alexandre Gori Maia, 2018. "The Impacts of Cash Transfers on Subjective Wellbeing and Poverty: The Case of Colombia," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 616-633, December.
    15. Martinez-Jimenez, Mario & Hollingsworth, Bruce & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2021. "Health, Retirement and Economic Shocks," IZA Discussion Papers 14574, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2017. "The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 3-32, Spring.
    17. Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham & Peter Hull & Michal Koles'ar, 2021. "Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions," Papers 2106.05024, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    18. Jason Abrevaya & Yu-Chin Hsu & Robert P. Lieli, 2015. "Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 485-505, October.
    19. Farrell, Max H., 2015. "Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-23.
    20. Roberto ESPOSTI, 2014. "To match, not to match, how to match: Estimating the farm-level impact of the CAP-first pillar reform (or: How to Apply Treatment-Effect Econometrics when the Real World is;a Mess)," Working Papers 403, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:13-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.