IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Környezeti és költségvetési szempontok szorításában. A renacionalizálás mint az EU közös agrárpolitikájának lehetséges reformiránya
[Under environmental and budgetary constraints: renationalisation as a potential long-term direction of reforming the EU Common Agricultural Policy]

Author

Listed:
  • Kengyel, Ákos

Abstract

Az Európai Unió közös agrárpolitikája (KAP) az elmúlt évtizedek során fokozatos átalakuláson ment keresztül. Jövőbeli hatékony működése érdekében elkerülhetetlen további reformlépések keresztülvitele, hiszen az EU környezeti és klímapolitikai stratégiai célkitűzései és a célok finanszírozásával összefüggő uniós és tagállami költségvetési szerepvállalás dilemmái komoly kihívásokat jelentenek a közös agrárpolitika hatékonyabb végrehajtása szempontjából. Az új célkitűzésekre történő megfelelő reagálás felveti az agrárpolitika valamilyen fokú renacio nali zá lá sára irányuló megfontolások alaposabb elemzésének szükségességét. A szerző a 2023-2027 közötti időszakra elfogadott új uniós szabályozási keretekben bekövetkező változások figyelembevételével elemzi a közös agrárpolitika előtt álló célkitűzések hatékonyabb megvalósításának és finanszírozásának hosszú távon megvalósítható lehetséges elvi irányait, kiemelten vizsgálva a társfinanszírozás kérdéskörét is. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: H77, O13, Q18.

Suggested Citation

  • Kengyel, Ákos, 2022. "Környezeti és költségvetési szempontok szorításában. A renacionalizálás mint az EU közös agrárpolitikájának lehetséges reformiránya [Under environmental and budgetary constraints: renationalisation," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 721-738.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2055
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2022.6.721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2055
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2022.6.721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erjavec, Karmen & Erjavec, Emil, 2015. "‘Greening the CAP’ – Just a fashionable justification? A discourse analysis of the 2014–2020 CAP reform documents," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 53-62.
    2. Pavel CIAIAN & Sergio GOMEZ y PALOMA, 2011. "The Value of EU Agricultural Landscape," JRC Research Reports JRC65456, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Friedrich Heinemann, 2017. "The Case for Co-Financing the CAP," EconPol Working Paper 4, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Friedrich Heinemann & Stefani Weiss, 2018. "The EU Budget and Common Agricultural Policy Beyond 2020: Seven More Years of Money for Nothing?," EconPol Working Paper 17, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Niemi, Jyrki S. & Kola, Jukka, 2005. "Renationalization of the Common Agricultural Policy: Mission Impossible?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(4), pages 1-39.
    6. Alan Greer, 2013. "The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU budget: stasis or change?," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 2(2), pages 119-136, December.
    7. Alberto Navarro & José Vicente López-Bao, 2019. "EU agricultural policy still not green," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 990-990, November.
    8. Grochowska, Renata & Kosior, Katarzyna, 2008. "The Future Of The Cap – A Declining Policy In The European Union?," 109th Seminar, November 20-21, 2008, Viterbo, Italy 44787, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ákos Kengyel, 2022. "Would Renationalisation and Co-financing of the Common Agricultural Policy Be Justified?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(2), pages 113-119, March.
    2. Stępień Sebastian & Czyżewski Andrzej, 2019. "Quo vadis Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union?," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 295-309, December.
    3. Žáková Kroupová, Zdenka & Havlíková, M. & Hálová, P. & Malý, M., 2016. "Economic Valuation of Mountain Landscapes and Ecosystems: A Meta-Analysis of Case Studies," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Anastasija Novikova & Lucia Rocchi & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2019. "Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    7. Bernués, Alberto & Alfnes, Frode & Clemetsen, Morten & Eik, Lars Olav & Faccioni, Georgia & Ramanzin, Maurizio & Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon & Rodríguez-Ortega, Tamara & Sturaro, Enrico, 2019. "Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Minotti Bianca & Zagata Lukáš, 2020. "Towards Food Policy for Europe: A Comparison of the Post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy Discourses," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 53-66, March.
    9. Kocjančič, Tina & Debeljak, Marko & Žgajnar, Jaka & Juvančič, Luka, 2018. "Incorporation of emergy into multiple-criteria decision analysis for sustainable and resilient structure of dairy farms in Slovenia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 71-83.
    10. Alberto Stanislao Atzori & Roberto Furesi & Fabio A. Madau & Pietro Pulina & Pier Giacomo Rassu, 2015. "Sustainability of Dairy Sheep Production in Pasture Lands: A Case Study Approach to Integrate Economic and Environmental Perspectives," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 117-134.
    11. Carmelo Díaz-Poblete & María Carmen García-Cortijo & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero, 2021. "Is the Greening Instrument a Valid Precedent for the New Green Architecture of the CAP? The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Apostolos G. Papadopoulos, 2015. "The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 4(1), pages 22-53, April.
    13. El Benni, Nadja & Irek, Judith & Finger, Robert & Mack, Gabriele & Ammann, Jeanine, 2024. "Citizens’ perceptions of agricultural policy goals—evidence from Switzerland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Lencsés, Enikő & Hegedűs, Szilárd & Bajkó, Norbert, 2023. "Changes In The Performance Of The Agricultural Sector In Hungary Due To The 2008 Economic Crisis And Covid-19 Pandemic," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 16(3), September.
    15. Lakes, Tobia & Garcia-Marquez, Jaime & Müller, Daniel & Lakner, Sebastian & Pe’er, Guy, 2020. "How green is greening? A fine-scale analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics in Germany," FORLand Working Papers 17 (2020), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    16. Alessandro Olper & Daniele Valenti & Valentina Raimondi & Daniele Curzi, 2023. "The EU enlargements treatment effect on agricultural policy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 1134-1153, June.
    17. Robert Huber & Robert Finger, 2020. "A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 357-383, June.
    18. Daniel Nilsson & Håkan Rosenqvist, 2021. "Profitability of Crop Cultivation in Small Arable Fields When Taking Economic Values of Ecosystem Services into Account," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Andrea Molocchi, 2020. "From production to consumption: An inter-sectoral analysis of air emissions external costs in Italy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(2), pages 155-180.
    20. Katharine Heyl & Felix Ekardt & Lennard Sund & Paula Roos, 2022. "Potentials and Limitations of Subsidies in Sustainability Governance: The Example of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.