IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v183y2023i2d10.1007_s10551-022-05069-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Reaction to Manager Stewardship Behavior: Crediting or Stigmatizing the Behavior?

Author

Listed:
  • Yongjun Kang

    (Guangdong University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jian Peng

    (Guangzhou University)

  • Qi Nie

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

Abstract

Manager stewardship behavior, defined as an ethical initiative whereby managers subjugate their personal interests to protect their organization’s long-term welfare, has been widely considered beneficial for organizations and subordinates. However, is manager stewardship behavior also viewed as good in the eyes of peers? This research examines peer reactions to manager stewardship behavior. Drawing on person perception theory, we expect that a peer may credit and support manager stewardship behavior or stigmatize and undermine it depending on his or her attributions (organizational concern versus impression management). Study 1 (a vignette experiment: n = 200) found that manager stewardship behavior is related to credit evaluation by a peer and subsequently increases peer support and decreases peer undermining when attributed to organizational concern motives; however, it is related to stigma evaluation by a peer and subsequently increases peer undermining and decreases peer support when attributed to impression management motives. Study 2 (n = 221) replicated the results of Study 1 using a field survey design. These findings expand our understanding of the implications of stewardship behavior from a peer perspective and offer insight for managers into how to engage in stewardship behavior wisely.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongjun Kang & Jian Peng & Qi Nie, 2023. "Peer Reaction to Manager Stewardship Behavior: Crediting or Stigmatizing the Behavior?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 453-474, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:183:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05069-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05069-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-022-05069-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-022-05069-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Hang & Chen, Chao C. & Li, Xinchun & Zhou, Yinghui, 2013. "From Personal Relationship to Psychological Ownership: The Importance of Manager–Owner Relationship Closeness in Family Businesses," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 295-318, July.
    2. Volker G. Kuppelwieser, 2011. "Stewardship Behavior and Creativity," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 22(3), pages 274295-2742.
    3. Volker G. Kuppelwieser, 2011. "Stewardship Behavior and Creativity," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 22(3), pages 274295-2742.
    4. James H. Davis & Mathew R. Allen & H. David Hayes, 2010. "Is Blood Thicker Than Water? A Study of Stewardship Perceptions in Family Business," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(6), pages 1093-1116, November.
    5. Henssen, Bart & Voordeckers, Wim & Lambrechts, Frank & Koiranen, Matti, 2014. "The CEO autonomy–stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of psychological ownership," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 312-322.
    6. Michael Palanski & Alexander Newman & Hannes Leroy & Celia Moore & Sean Hannah & Deanne Den Hartog, 2021. "Quantitative Research on Leadership and Business Ethics: Examining the State of the Field and an Agenda for Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 109-119, January.
    7. Cam Caldwell & Linda Hayes & Patricia Bernal & Ranjan Karri, 2008. "Ethical Stewardship – Implications for Leadership and Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 153-164, March.
    8. Jian Peng & Zhen Wang & Xiao Chen, 2019. "Does Self-Serving Leadership Hinder Team Creativity? A Moderated Dual-Path Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 419-433, October.
    9. Cheng-Chen (Timothy) Lin & Tai-Kuang (T. K.) Peng, 2010. "From Organizational Citizenship Behaviour to Team Performance: The Mediation of Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 6(1), pages 55-75, March.
    10. Lin, Cheng-Chen (Timothy) & Peng, Tai-Kuang (T. K.), 2010. "From Organizational Citizenship Behaviour to Team Performance: The Mediation of Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 55-75, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Domínguez-Escrig & Francisco Fermín Mallén-Broch & Rafael Lapiedra-Alcamí & Ricardo Chiva-Gómez, 2019. "The Influence of Leaders’ Stewardship Behavior on Innovation Success: The Mediating Effect of Radical Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 849-862, October.
    2. Rupak Rauniar & Greg Rawski & Donald Hudson, 2017. "Antecedents And Consequences Of Ippd Effectiveness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-38, October.
    3. Yang Qiu & Ming Lou & Li Zhang & Yiqin Wang, 2020. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives and Thriving at Work: The Mediating Role of Citizenship Fatigue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Toru Yoshikawa & Helen Wei Hu, 2017. "Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Directors: An Integrated Framework of Director Role-Identity and Boardroom Structure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 99-109, June.
    5. Yu-Shan Chen & Chun-Ming Lien & Wei-Yuan Lo & Fuh-Shyong Tsay, 2021. "Sustainability of Positive Psychological Status in the Workplace: The Influence of Organizational Psychological Ownership and Psychological Capital on Police Officers’ Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Zhiyu Feng & Fong Keng-Highberger & Kai Chi Yam & Xiao-Ping Chen & Hu Li, 2023. "Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: How and When Machiavellian Leaders Demonstrate Strategic Abuse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 255-280, April.
    7. Fábio Frezatti & Diógenes de Souza Bido & Daniel Magalhães Mucci & Franciele Beck, 2022. "Essence taxonomy of Brazilian family businesses and conceptual implications for governance strategy," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 813-849, September.
    8. Cui, Xiling, 2017. "In- and extra-role knowledge sharing among information technology professionals: The five-factor model perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 380-389.
    9. Hsu Yu-Ping & Peng Chun-Yang & Chou Ming-Tao & Yeh Chun-Tsen & Zhang Qiong-yuan, 2020. "Workplace Friendship, Helping Behavior, and Turnover Intention: The Meditating Effect of Affective Commitment," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(5), pages 1-4.
    10. Sicheng Luo & Hao-Chieh Lin, 2022. "How do TMT shared cognitions shape firm performance? The roles of collective efficacy, trust, and competitive aggressiveness," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 295-318, March.
    11. Wolfgang Burr & Johann Valentowitsch & Christopher Sauerhoff, 2015. "Examining the Impact of Family Management on Patent Applications for German Industrial Firms," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11.
    12. Muhammad Arshad & Ghulam Abid & Francoise Venezia Contreras Torres, 2021. "Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 133-150, February.
    13. Emmanuel Mensah Horsey & Lijia Guo & Jiashun Huang, 2023. "Ethical party culture, control, and citizenship behavior: Evidence from Ghana," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Ben Akume & Osarumwense Iguisi, 2020. "Developing capabilities for sustainability in family owned SMEs: An emerging market scenario," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(6), pages 24-36, October.
    15. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    16. Zhong, Xuepan & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M. & Yang, Xuan & Chen, Huaping, 2012. "Empowering teams through social network ties," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 209-220.
    17. Joe, Sheng-Wuu & Tsai, Yuan-Hui & Lin, Chieh-Peng & Liu, Wei-Te, 2014. "Modeling team performance and its determinants in high-tech industries: Future trends of virtual teaming," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 16-25.
    18. Kelly Z. Peng & Zhijun Chen & Iris D. Zhang & Jinsong Li, 2021. "Unwilling to leave the good Samaritans: How peer interpersonal-oriented citizenship behaviors retains “me”," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 669-685, June.
    19. Angela Carradus & Ricardo Zozimo & Allan Discua Cruz, 2020. "Exploring a Faith-Led Open-Systems Perspective of Stewardship in Family Businesses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 701-714, May.
    20. Jörn H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & James Lau & Martin Obschonka & André Presse, 2019. "How Do Labor Market Institutions Influence the Preference to Work in Family Firms? A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Countries," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(6), pages 1067-1093, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:183:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05069-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.