IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v171y2021i4d10.1007_s10551-020-04456-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Longitudinal Assessment of Corrective Advertising Mandated in United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Berry

    (Colorado State University)

  • Scot Burton

    (University of Arkansas)

  • Jeremy Kees

    (Villanova University)

  • J. Craig Andrews

    (Marquette University)

Abstract

Due to the ethical breaches of tobacco companies over a 50-year period, a U.S. Court ruled in United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. that major U.S. tobacco companies had misled consumers and the government about tobacco’s addictiveness, effects of environmental (secondhand) smoke, marketing targeted at adolescents, and deceptive practices related to harmfulness of smoking. We address the actions of the tobacco companies based on the consumer’s right to be informed and values for ethical corporate behavior, and we draw from psychological theories and the smoking literature to develop our conceptual framework and test the effectiveness of the ensuing corrective advertising campaign mandated in the Court decision. We use a quota sample of 470 smokers and non-smoker participants in a longitudinal study to test the impact of the corrective advertising campaign on key antismoking beliefs from the campaign. Results reveal that the corrective ad campaign has not been successful in affecting smokers’ or non-smokers’ antismoking beliefs. However, differences are found between smokers’ and non-smokers’ beliefs about the adverse health effects of smoking, effects of secondhand smoke, and tobacco company deceptiveness, with these beliefs being stronger for non-smokers. Smokers’ weaker beliefs about the effects of secondhand smoke are viewed as particularly problematic, given the established health risks. We address the implications of the ethical breaches and the corrective advertising attempt to address the deception identified by the Court.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Berry & Scot Burton & Jeremy Kees & J. Craig Andrews, 2021. "A Longitudinal Assessment of Corrective Advertising Mandated in United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 757-770, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:171:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04456-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04456-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-020-04456-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-020-04456-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, J.B., 1996. "Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: Health policy implications," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(1), pages 18-24.
    2. Davis, Cassandra Denise & Burton, Scot, 2019. "Making bad look good: The counterpersuasive effects of natural labels on (dangerous) vice goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 271-282.
    3. Chase Thiel & Zhanna Bagdasarov & Lauren Harkrider & James Johnson & Michael Mumford, 2012. "Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 49-64, April.
    4. Timothy Dewhirst & Wonkyong B. Lee & Geoffrey T. Fong & Pamela M. Ling, 2016. "Exporting an Inherently Harmful Product: The Marketing of Virginia Slims Cigarettes in the United States, Japan, and Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 161-181, November.
    5. Cermin, Ashley & Berry, Christopher & Burton, Scot & Howlett, Elizabeth, 2019. "The effects of the FTC-mandated disclosure on homeopathic product purchase intentions and efficacy perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 47-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Rey-Moreno, Manuel & Periáñez-Cristóbal, Rafael, 2021. "Analysis of the moderating effect of front-of-pack labelling on the relation between brand attitude and purchasing intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 304-310.
    2. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    3. Rachel Fichter, 2018. "Do the Right Thing! Developing Ethical Behavior in Financial Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 69-84, August.
    4. Lu-Ming Tseng & Yue-Min Kang, 2015. "Managerial Authority, Turnover Intention and Medical Insurance Claims Adjusters’ Recommendations for Claim Payments," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 40(2), pages 334-352, April.
    5. Renaud Lunardo & Camille Saintives & Damien Chaney, 2021. "Food packaging and the color red: How negative cognitive associations influence feelings of guilt," Post-Print hal-04455590, HAL.
    6. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Post-Print halshs-01009708, HAL.
    7. Jeroen Maesschalck, 2022. "Making Behavioral Ethics Research More Useful for Ethics Management Practice: Embracing Complexity Using a Design Science Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 933-944, December.
    8. Fazal-e-Hasan, Syed Muhammad & Ahmadi, Hormoz & Mortimer, Gary & Sekhon, Harjit & Kharouf, Husni & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2020. "The interplay of positive and negative emotions to quit unhealthy consumption behaviors: Insights for social marketers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 349-360.
    9. Nakamura, Ryota & Yao, Ying, 2021. "Does Restricting the Availability of Cigarettes Reduce Smoking?," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-108, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. World Health Organization, 2003. "SACTob Recommendation on Health Claims Derived form ISO/FTC Method to Measure Cigarette Yield," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9rp541j0, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    11. Christian Julmi, 2024. "Analysis and Intuition Effectiveness in Moral Problems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 179-193, April.
    12. Lumina Albert & Scott Reynolds & Bulent Turan, 2015. "Turning Inward or Focusing Out? Navigating Theories of Interpersonal and Ethical Cognitions to Understand Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 467-484, August.
    13. Michaela Jackson & Paul Harrison & Boyd Swinburn & Mark Lawrence, 2015. "Marketing ethics in context: the promotion of unhealthy foods and beverages to children," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 17, pages 354-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Lunardo, Renaud & Saintives, Camille & Chaney, Damien, 2021. "Food packaging and the color red: How negative cognitive associations influence feelings of guilt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 589-600.
    15. Davit Marikyan & Savvas Papagiannidis, 2024. "Exercising the “Right to Repair”: A Customer’s Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 35-61, August.
    16. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "The dynamics of ethical judgment : an essay of modelization," Post-Print halshs-01009718, HAL.
    17. Beth Pontari & Andrea Stanaland & Tom Smythe, 2009. "Regulating Information Disclosure in Mutual Fund Advertising in the United States: Will Consumers Utilize Cost Information?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 333-351, December.
    18. Eva Zedlacher & Denise Salin, 2021. "Acceptable Behavior or Workplace Bullying?—How Perpetrator Gender and Hierarchical Status Affect Third Parties’ Attributions and Moral Judgments of Negative Behaviors," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Jacob Suher & Courtney Szocs & Koert Ittersum, 2021. "When imperfect is preferred: the differential effect of aesthetic imperfections on choice of processed and unprocessed foods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 903-924, September.
    20. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01009708, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:171:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04456-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.