IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v154y2019i1d10.1007_s10551-016-3400-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idiosyncratic Deals from a Distributive Justice Perspective: Examining Co-workers’ Voice Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Elise Marescaux

    (IÉSEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS 9221))

  • Sophie De Winne

    (KU Leuven)

  • Luc Sels

    (KU Leuven)

Abstract

This study focuses on a third-party perspective of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). More specifically, we look into the differential judgments co-workers make about i-deals in their work environment, as well as their reactions. Based on equity theory, we examine to what extent the content of the i-deal and the work context (i.e., the functional dependence between co-worker and i-dealer) explain co-worker judgments regarding i-deal fairness in addition to subsequent voice behavior (i.e., complaining and/or requesting compensation). A vignette study with 1988 respondents shows that when i-deals are considered distributively unfair, co-workers try to restore equity through voice behavior, thereby making the i-deal less effective. Furthermore, i-deals spark more distributive injustice perceptions and voice behavior in a highly interdependent work context. Finally, on average, financial bonuses were considered most distributively unfair and, thus, trigger more voice behavior. These results have important implications for i-deal literature as they uncover the criteria that co-workers use to judge i-deals and shape their reactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise Marescaux & Sophie De Winne & Luc Sels, 2019. "Idiosyncratic Deals from a Distributive Justice Perspective: Examining Co-workers’ Voice Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 263-281, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:154:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3400-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3400-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-016-3400-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-016-3400-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costigan, Robert D. & Insinga, Richard C. & Berman, J. Jason & Kranas, Grazyna & Kureshov, Vladimir A., 2011. "Revisiting the relationship of supervisor trust and CEO trust to turnover intentions: A three-country comparative study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 74-83, January.
    2. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    3. Tae-Yeol Kim & Jeffrey Edwards & Debra Shapiro, 2015. "Social Comparison and Distributive Justice: East Asia Differences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 401-414, December.
    4. Goodman, Paul S. & Haisley, Emily, 2007. "Social comparison processes in an organizational context: New directions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 109-125, January.
    5. Lind, E. Allan & Kray, Laura & Thompson, Leigh, 2001. "Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 189-210, July.
    6. Johanna Kujala & Anna-Maija Lämsä & Katriina Penttilä, 2011. "Managers’ Moral Decision-Making Patterns Over Time: A Multidimensional Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(2), pages 191-207, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lien Vossaert & Frederik Anseel & Veroniek Collewaert & Nicolai J. Foss, 2022. "‘There’s Many a Slip “Twixt the Cup and the Lip”’: HR Management Practices and Firm Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 660-694, May.
    2. Smriti Anand & Jeremy D. Meuser & Prajya R. Vidyarthi & Robert C. Liden & Denise M. Rousseau & Srinivas Ekkirala, 2022. "A Multi‐Level Model of I‐deals in Workgroups: Employee and Coworker Perceptions of Leader Fairness, I‐Deals and Group Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 489-517, March.
    3. Mohamed Fathy Agina & Hazem Ahmed Khairy & Mohamed A. Abdel Fatah & Youssef H. Manaa & Rabab M. Abdallah & Nadir Aliane & Jehad Afaneh & Bassam Samir Al-Romeedy, 2023. "Distributive Injustice and Work Disengagement in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry: Mediating Roles of the Workplace Negative Gossip and Organizational Cynicism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Tae-Soo Ha & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2023. "Distributive Justice, Goal Clarity, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Muhammad Nawaz & Ghulam Abid & Talat Islam & Jinsoo Hwang & Zohra Lassi, 2022. "Providing Solution in an Emergency: COVID-19 and Voice Behavior of Healthcare Professionals," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    6. Rofcanin, Yasin & Heras, Mireia Las & Bosch, Maria Jose & Berber, Aykut & Mughal, Farooq & Ozturk, Mustafa, 2021. "Servant leadership and family supportiveness: Looking into employees’ work and family outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 70-82.
    7. LaJuan Perronoski Fuller, 2021. "Distributive Injustice: Leadership Adherence to Social Norm Pressures and the Negative Impact on Organizational Commitment," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Raymond Kwong & Macy Wong & Jinyun Duan, 2023. "Great leaders do everything: a moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, trust in leader, helping behaviour, and idiosyncratic deals," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 549-569, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Marion Fortin, 2014. "One Justice or Two? A Model of Reconciliation of Normative Justice Theories and Empirical Research on Organizational Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 435-451, October.
    2. van Dijke, Marius & Verboon, Peter, 2010. "Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 80-91, February.
    3. Shaobo Wei & Weiling Ke & Augustine A. Lado & Hefu Liu & Kwok Kee Wei, 2020. "The Effects of Justice and Top Management Beliefs and Participation: An Exploratory Study in the Context of Digital Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 51-71, September.
    4. Cropanzano, Russell & Paddock, Layne & Rupp, Deborah E. & Bagger, Jessica & Baldwin, Amanda, 2008. "How regulatory focus impacts the process-by-outcome interaction for perceived fairness and emotions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 36-51, January.
    5. Sherf, Elad N. & Venkataramani, Vijaya, 2015. "Friend or foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Chenot, David & Boutakidis, Ioakim & Benton, Amy D., 2014. "Equity and fairness perceptions in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 400-406.
    7. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    8. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    9. Amar Fall & Fatéma Safy-Godineau & David Carassus, 2018. "Perceptions de justice organisationnelle dans les collectivités locales : quels impacts sur le bien-être psychologique au travail et sur l’intention de quitter des agents ?," Post-Print hal-02142237, HAL.
    10. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    11. Dodgson, Mary Kate & Agoglia, Christopher P. & Bennett, G. Bradley, 2021. "The influence of relationship partners on client managers’ negotiation positions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Hakan Yalçın & Yeliz Yalçın, 2022. "A Meta Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction: The Case of Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 51(2), pages 417-432, November.
    13. Liebig, Stefan & Schupp, Jürgen, 2008. "Leistungs- oder Bedarfsgerechtigkeit? Über einen normativen Zielkonflikt des Wohlfahrtsstaats und seiner Bedeutung für die Bewertung des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 7-30.
    14. Chan, Sow Hup Joanne & Lai, Ho Yan Isabella, 2017. "Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 214-223.
    15. Karakostas, Alexandros & Kocher, Martin G. & Matzat, Dominik & Rau, Holger A. & Riewe, Gerhard, 2023. "The team allocator game: Allocation power in public goods games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 73-87.
    16. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    17. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    18. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    19. Lalit Kumar Yadav & Pawan Gupta, 2017. "Procedural Justice, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Mediating Role of Organizational Trust—Indian Tourism Industry Study," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(3), pages 275-292, August.
    20. Hang-yue Ngo & Raymond Loi & Sharon Foley & Xiaoming Zheng & Lingqing Zhang, 2013. "Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 149-168, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:154:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3400-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.