IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v152y2018i4d10.1007_s10551-016-3299-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carrot or Stick? The Role of In-Group/Out-Group on the Multilevel Relationship Between Authoritarian and Differential Leadership and Employee Turnover Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang

    (Dongbei University of Finance and Economics)

  • Meng-Yu Cheng

    (Feng Chia University)

  • Song Wang

    (Zhejiang University)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop an integrative model linking the effect of authoritarian leadership (at the individual level) and differential leadership (at the team level) on employee turnover intention, and further explore the moderating role of the in-group/out-group on the above-mentioned relationships. We collected a sample of 624 supervisor–subordinate dyads from 87 teams in Mainland China and Taiwan. We find that, at the individual level, authoritarian leadership is positively related with employee turnover intention, and the relationship will be enhanced especially when the subordinate is an in-group member (rather than an out-group member). Through hierarchical linear modeling analysis, we find a negative relationship between differential leadership and employee turnover intention, significantly moderated by the within-team mean degree and the within-team variance degree of in-group/out-group. Contributions, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Meng-Yu Cheng & Song Wang, 2018. "Carrot or Stick? The Role of In-Group/Out-Group on the Multilevel Relationship Between Authoritarian and Differential Leadership and Employee Turnover Intention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1069-1084, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:152:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3299-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3299-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-016-3299-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-016-3299-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Min & Huang, Xu & Li, Chenwei & Liu, Wu, 2012. "Perceived Interactional Justice and Trust-in-supervisor as Mediators for Paternalistic Leadership," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 97-121, March.
    2. Evans, Martin G., 1985. "A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 305-323, December.
    3. Ozgur Demirtas & A. Akdogan, 2015. "The Effect of Ethical Leadership Behavior on Ethical Climate, Turnover Intention, and Affective Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 59-67, August.
    4. Sebastian Schuh & Xin-an Zhang & Peng Tian, 2013. "For the Good or the Bad? Interactive Effects of Transformational Leadership with Moral and Authoritarian Leadership Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 629-640, September.
    5. Min Wu & Xu Huang & Chenwei Li & Wu Liu, 2012. "Perceived Interactional Justice and Trust-in-supervisor as Mediators for Paternalistic Leadership," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(1), pages 97-121, March.
    6. Wu, Min & Huang, Xu & Li, Chenwei & Liu, Wu, 2012. "Perceived Interactional Justice and Trust-in-supervisor as Mediators for Paternalistic Leadership," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(01), pages 97-122, March.
    7. Ballinger, Gary A. & Lehman, David W. & Schoorman, F. David, 2010. "Leader-member exchange and turnover before and after succession events," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 25-36, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Sarah Hudson & Helena V. González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2022. "Societal Inequality, Corruption and Relation-Based Inequality in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 789-809, December.
    3. Chris C. Gernreich & Sebastian Knop, 2019. "Empowering Creative Employees: Phase-Specific Support In The Front-End Of Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leni Chen & Xu Huang & Jian-min Sun & Yuyan Zheng & Les Graham & Judy Jiang, 2024. "The virtue of a controlling leadership style: Authoritarian leadership, work stressors, and leader power distance orientation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 507-547, June.
    2. Qinxuan Gu & Thomas Tang & Wan Jiang, 2015. "Does Moral Leadership Enhance Employee Creativity? Employee Identification with Leader and Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) in the Chinese Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 513-529, February.
    3. Gao Jianzhuang, 2023. "The Influence of Ethical Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior--Workplace Humanization as a Mediating Variable," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 20(1), pages 92-108.
    4. Chiang, Jack Ting Ju & Chen, Xiao Ping & Liu, Haiyang & Akutsu, Satoshi & Wang, Zheng, 2020. "We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104058, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Cai-Hui Veronica Lin & Jian-Min James Sun, 2018. "Chinese employees’ leadership preferences and the relationship with power distance orientation and core self-evaluation," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Chieh-Peng Lin & Chi Jhang & Yu-Min Wang, 2022. "Learning value-based leadership in teams: the moderation of emotional regulation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1387-1408, July.
    7. Naseer Abbas Khan & Robin Maialeh & Maria Akhtar & Muhammad Ramzan, 2024. "The Role of AI Self-Efficacy in Religious Contexts in Public Sector: The Social Cognitive Theory Perspective," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1015-1036, September.
    8. Lei Yao & Xiao-Ping Chen & Hongguo Wei, 2023. "How do authoritarian and benevolent leadership affect employee work–family conflict? An emotional regulation perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1525-1553, December.
    9. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2021. "Two to Tango? A cross-cultural investigation of the leader-follower agreement on authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 473-485.
    10. Ahmad, Saima, 2018. "Can ethical leadership inhibit workplace bullying across East and West: Exploring cross-cultural interactional justice as a mediating mechanism," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 223-234.
    11. Yuyan Zheng & Les Graham & Jiing-Lih Farh & Xu Huang, 2021. "The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Ethical Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model of Felt Uncertainty and Leader Benevolence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 133-146, April.
    12. Wang, An-Chih & Chiang, Jack Ting-Ju & Tsai, Chou-Yu & Lin, Tzu-Ting & Cheng, Bor-Shiuan, 2013. "Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 101-113.
    13. Nedime Karasel & Zehra Altınay & Fahriye Altınay & Gokmen Dagli, 2018. "Paternalist leadership style of the organizational trust," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 11-30, December.
    14. Horak, Sven, 2013. "Cross-cultural experimental economics and indigenous management research: Issues and contributions," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 92/2013, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    15. Han Ren & Zhengqiang Zhong & Charles Weizheng Chen & Chris Brewster, 2023. "Two-way in-/congruence in three components of paternalistic leadership and subordinate justice: the mediating role of perceptions of renqing," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 643-668, April.
    16. Shuang Ren & Yuhua Xie & Ying Zhu & Malcolm Warner, 2018. "New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 437-458, August.
    17. Yue Wang & Wenhao Luo & Jing Zhang & Yirong Guo, 2019. "More humility, less counterproductive work behaviors? The role of interpersonal justice and trust," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Anand, Amitabh & Dalmasso, Audrey & Vessal, Saeedeh Rezaee & Parameswar, Nakul & Rajasekar, James & Dhal, Manoranjan, 2023. "The effect of job security, insecurity, and burnout on employee organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Tingting Chen & Fuli Li & Kwok Leung, 2017. "Whipping into shape: Construct definition, measurement, and validation of directive-achieving leadership in Chinese culture," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 537-563, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:152:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3299-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.