IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v23y2019i08ns1363919619400073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering Creative Employees: Phase-Specific Support In The Front-End Of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • CHRIS C. GERNREICH

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair for Industrial Sales and Service Engineering, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • SEBASTIAN KNOP

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair for Industrial Sales and Service Engineering, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

Abstract

Employees often do not speak about raw ideas, to avoid a loss of face. Therefore, they struggle to develop their ideas further and share them in the workplace. Since research on the unconscious processes of idea development in the front-end of innovation is scarce, we explore this phenomenon by identifying the most prevalent needs for ideation in literature. We evaluate these needs by surveying 122 employees of a German automotive company. Our results show an overall hierarchy of needs and four clusters of employees based on the indicated needs in different phases of their idea development process. Employees with many ideas have the most demands. Employees with fewer ideas demand more social interaction and access to information technology to gather information and evaluate ideas. We find that the demand for resources varies significantly throughout the idea development process. Therefore, organizations must address employees’ needs differently, depending on what phase of the idea development process their ideas are in, and the number of ideas submitted.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris C. Gernreich & Sebastian Knop, 2019. "Empowering Creative Employees: Phase-Specific Support In The Front-End Of Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-31, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:23:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619400073
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919619400073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919619400073
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919619400073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Wang & Meng-Yu Cheng & Song Wang, 2018. "Carrot or Stick? The Role of In-Group/Out-Group on the Multilevel Relationship Between Authoritarian and Differential Leadership and Employee Turnover Intention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1069-1084, November.
    2. Chris C. Gernreich, 2018. "What Employees Really Want: Demands For Individual Idea Development," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Nick Bontis & Mary M. Crossan & John Hulland, 2002. "Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 437-469, June.
    4. Guo, Liang & Decoster, Stijn & Babalola, Mayowa T. & De Schutter, Leander & Garba, Omale A. & Riisla, Katrin, 2018. "Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 219-230.
    5. Hoegl, Martin & Gibbert, Michael & Mazursky, David, 2008. "Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1382-1391, September.
    6. John Bessant, 1998. "Developing Continuous Improvement Capability," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 409-429.
    7. Andrew B. Hargadon & Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 484-500, August.
    8. Jennie Björk & Fausto Di Vincenzo & Mats Magnusson & Daniele Mascia, 2011. "The Impact of Social Capital on Ideation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 631-647, August.
    9. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss & Richardson, Lisa, 1991. "Engines of progress: Designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies--The enter-prize program at Ohio Bell, 1985-1990," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 209-229, May.
    10. Jay Pil Choi, 2004. "Tying and innovation: A dynamic analysis of tying arrangements," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(492), pages 83-101, January.
    11. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss & North, Jeffrey & Richardson, Lisa & Ingols, Cynthia & Zolner, Joseph, 1991. "Engines of progress: Designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies; Raytheon's new product center, 1969-1989," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 145-163, March.
    12. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Sonya Fontenot Premeaux & Arthur G. Bedeian, 2003. "Breaking the Silence: The Moderating Effects of Self‐Monitoring in Predicting Speaking Up in the Workplace," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1537-1562, September.
    14. Luis Garicano, 2000. "Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(5), pages 874-904, October.
    15. Vila, Luis E. & Pérez, Pedro J. & Coll-Serrano, Vicente, 2014. "Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 752-757.
    16. Ronald S. Burt & Giuseppe Soda, 2017. "Social Origins of Great Strategies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 226-233, December.
    17. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss & Richardson, Lisa & North, Jeffrey & Morgan, Erika, 1991. "Engines of progress: Designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies; The new venture process at Eastman Kodak, 1983-1989," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 63-82, January.
    18. Nambisan, Satish, 2013. "Industry technical committees, technological distance, and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 928-940.
    19. Schonberger, Richard J., 2018. "Frustration-driven process improvement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 297-307.
    20. T. R. Madanmohan, 2005. "Incremental Technical Innovations And Their Determinants," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 481-510.
    21. Qinxuan Gu & Thomas Tang & Wan Jiang, 2015. "Does Moral Leadership Enhance Employee Creativity? Employee Identification with Leader and Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) in the Chinese Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 513-529, February.
    22. Cheng-Ping Chang & Pei-Chun Hsu, 2015. "The correlation between employee information literacy and employee creativity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 221-234, January.
    23. Glenn Brophey & Anahita Baregheh & David Hemsworth, 2013. "Innovation Process, Decision-Making, Perceived Risks And Metrics: A Dynamics Test," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-22.
    24. Jeffrey S. Hornsby & Douglas W. Naffziger & Donald F. Kuratko & Ray V. Montagno, 1993. "An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(2), pages 29-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris C. Gernreich, 2018. "What Employees Really Want: Demands For Individual Idea Development," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Badguerahanian, Leon & Abetti, Pier A., 1995. "The rise and fall of the Merlin-Gerin Foundry Business: A case study in French corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 477-493, November.
    3. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Encarnación García-Sánchez, 2017. "Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 397-426, June.
    4. Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Paul Jones & Mathew Hughes, 2019. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1247-1268, December.
    5. Yogesh Upadhyay & Dharmendra Kumar, 2020. "Leader–Member Exchange, Psychological Capital and Employees’ Creativity," Vision, , vol. 24(4), pages 406-418, December.
    6. Mohamed Laid Ouakouak & Noufou Ouedraogo, 2017. "Antecedents Of Employee Creativity And Organisational Innovation: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Wiegmann, Paul Moritz & Eggers, Felix & de Vries, Henk J. & Blind, Knut, 2022. "Competing Standard-Setting Organizations: A Choice Experiment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    8. Soila Lemmetty & Vlad Petre Glăveanu & Kaija Collin & Panu Forsman, 2020. "(Un)Sustainable Creativity? Different Manager-Employee Perspectives in the Finnish Technology Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Wen, Jinyan & Qualls, William J. & Zeng, Deming, 2021. "To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Deryck J van Rensburg, 2013. "Is Strategic Entrepreneurship a Pleonasm?," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 15-27, February.
    11. Zahid Shafait & Zhu Yuming & Natanya Meyer & Włodzimierz Sroka, 2021. "Emotional Intelligence, Knowledge Management Processes and Creative Performance: Modelling the Mediating Role of Self-Directed Learning in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Abetti, Pier A., 1997. "The birth and growth of toshiba's laptop and notebook computers: A case study in Japanese corporate venturing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 507-529, November.
    13. Rigtering, J.P.C. (Coen) & Weitzel, G.U. (Utz) & Muehlfeld, K. (Katrin), 2019. "Increasing quantity without compromising quality: How managerial framing affects intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 224-241.
    14. Elia, Gianluca & Margherita, Alessandro, 2018. "Assessing the maturity of crowdventuring for corporate entrepreneurship," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 271-283.
    15. Zimmerling, Eric & Höllig, Christoph E. & Sandner, Philipp G. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2019. "Exploring the influence of common game elements on ideation output and motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 302-312.
    16. Pramodita Sharma & James J. Chrisman, 1999. "Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 11-28, April.
    17. Alain Verbeke & James J. Chrisman & Wenlong Yuan, 2007. "A Note on Strategic Renewal and Corporate Venturing in the Subsidiaries of Multinational Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(4), pages 585-600, July.
    18. Zahid Shafait & Jiayu Huang, 2022. "Nexus of Emotional Intelligence and Learning Outcomes: A Cross-Country Study of China and Pakistan Higher Educational Institutes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Nathalie Greenan & Edward Lorenz, 2009. "Learning Organisations: the importance of work organisation for innovation," Working Papers halshs-01376968, HAL.
    20. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:23:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619400073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.