IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbioec/v17y2015i1p17-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of human nature and its implications for politics: a critique

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Reydon

Abstract

This paper examines the tradition of attempts to support particular political or social views by referring to biological knowledge about human nature. It is argued that such arguments involve two steps, an argument from biological knowledge to general claims about human nature, and a normative argument from such general claims to the desirability of a particular social order. The concept of human nature serves as a bridge concept connecting these argumentative steps. Furthermore it is argued that both argumentative steps face serious problems, as the first argument stands on a weak biological basis and the second argument is unable to arbitrate between competing political or social positions. By examining four examples of arguments that attempt to connect biological knowledge to political/social views (by Peter Kropotkin, Peter Singer, Richard Alexander and Larry Arnhart) it is shown what such arguments can achieve, and what not. It is concluded that the proper role of arguments from biology to society is to serve as compatibility checks on our political, economic, and societal views, but not to provide actual support for some political/social views over competing ones. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Reydon, 2015. "The evolution of human nature and its implications for politics: a critique," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 17-36, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbioec:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:17-36
    DOI: 10.1007/s10818-014-9187-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10818-014-9187-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10818-014-9187-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gillian Brown & Peter Richerson, 2014. "Applying evolutionary theory to human behaviour: past differences and current debates," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 105-128, July.
    2. G. Liberopoulos & B. Tan & S.B. Gershwin & C.T. Papadopoulos & J. MacGregor Smith, 2004. "Preface," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 17-19, January.
    3. G. Liberopoulos & B. Tan & S.B. Gershwin & C.T. Papadopoulos & J. MacGregor Smith, 2004. "Preface," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 17-19, February.
    4. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario A. Cedrini & Roberto Marchionatti, 2017. "On the Theoretical and Practical Relevance of the Concept of Gift to the Development of a Non-imperialist Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 633-649, December.
    2. Doug Miller & Jens Ludwig, 2005. "Does Head Start Improve Children?s Life Chances? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design," Working Papers 534, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    3. Eliane Cristina de Araújo, 2009. "Nível do Câmbio e Crescimento Econômico: Teorias e Evidências para Países em Desenvolvimento e Emergentes - 1980 - 2007," Discussion Papers 1425, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    4. Clem Tisdell, 2005. "Linking Policies For Biodiversity Conservation With Advances In Behavioral Economics," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 50(spec0), pages 449-462.
    5. Pülzl, Helga & Lazdinis, Marius, 2011. "May the Open Method of Coordination be a new instrument for forest policy deliberations in the European Union?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 411-418, July.
    6. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "Darwinism and Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 85-97, March.
    8. Francesco Scotognella, 2024. "The importance of education in comprehending and judging technology," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(1), pages 29-34.
    9. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    10. Soleri, Daniela & Kleinman, Nathaniel & Newburn, Rebecca, 2021. "Community Seed Groups: Biological and Especially Social Investigations Can Support Crisis Response Capacity," SocArXiv swv47, Center for Open Science.
    11. Sergiu BÃLAN & Lucia Ovidia VREJA, 2019. "Leadership And Followership. An Evolutionary Perspective," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1185-1197, November.
    12. Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    13. Tarik Tazdaït & Alejandro Caparros & Jean-Chrsitophe Péreau, 2008. "Mutual Aid: An Indirect Evolution Analysis," Working Papers halshs-00275386, HAL.
    14. Zak, F., 2021. "On some models of altruistic behavior," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 12-52.
    15. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    16. Yan Zhang, 2018. "Crossing the divide: an integrated framework of the commons," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 25-48, June.
    17. Geoffrey Hodgson, 2014. "The evolution of morality and the end of economic man," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 83-106, January.
    18. Roberto Cazzolla Gatti & Roger Koppl & Brian D. Fath & Stuart Kauffman & Wim Hordijk & Robert E. Ulanowicz, 2020. "On the emergence of ecological and economic niches," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 99-127, July.
    19. Benchekroun, Hassan & Long, Ngo Van, 2008. "The build-up of cooperative behavior among non-cooperative selfish agents," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 239-252, July.
    20. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Argument to human nature; Argument from human nature ; Bridge concepts; Darwinian Liberalism; Evolutionary politics; Human nature; A12; B25; B52;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbioec:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:17-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.