IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v27y2024i2d10.1007_s10729-024-09671-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimization framework for large-scale screening under limited testing capacity with application to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayi Lin

    (Texas A &M University)

  • Hrayer Aprahamian

    (Texas A &M University)

  • George Golovko

    (The University of Texas Medical Branch)

Abstract

We consider the problem of targeted mass screening of heterogeneous populations under limited testing capacity. Mass screening is an essential tool that arises in various settings, e.g., ensuring a safe supply of blood, reducing prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases, and mitigating the spread of infectious disease outbreaks. The goal of mass screening is to classify whole population groups as positive or negative for an infectious disease as efficiently and accurately as possible. Under limited testing capacity, it is not possible to screen the entire population and hence administrators must reserve testing and target those among the population that are most in need or most susceptible. This paper addresses this decision problem by taking advantage of accessible population-level risk information to identify the optimal set of sub-populations to target for screening. We conduct a comprehensive analysis that considers the two most commonly adopted schemes: Individual testing and Dorfman group testing. For both schemes, we formulate an optimization model that aims to minimize the number of misclassifications under a testing capacity constraint. By analyzing the formulations, we establish key structural properties which we use to construct efficient and accurate solution techniques. We conduct a case study on COVID-19 in the United States using geographic-based data. Our results reveal that the considered proactive targeted schemes outperform commonly adopted practices by substantially reducing misclassifications. Our case study provides important managerial insights with regards to optimal allocation of tests, testing designs, and protocols that dictate the optimality of schemes. Such insights can inform policy-makers with tailored and implementable data-driven recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayi Lin & Hrayer Aprahamian & George Golovko, 2024. "An optimization framework for large-scale screening under limited testing capacity with application to COVID-19," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 223-238, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:27:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10729-024-09671-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-024-09671-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-024-09671-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-024-09671-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Atkeson & Michael C. Droste & Michael Mina & James H. Stock, 2020. "Economic Benefits of COVID-19 Screening Tests," NBER Working Papers 28031, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Caunhye, Aakil & Alem, Douglas & Barros, Anne & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "An optimization model for planning testing and control strategies to limit the spread of a pandemic – The case of COVID-19," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 308-324.
    3. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2020. "Optimal Group Testing: Structural Properties and Robust Solutions, with Application to Public Health Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 895-911, October.
    4. Christian Gollier & Olivier Gossner, 2020. "Group Testing against COVID-19," Working Papers 2020-04, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics, revised 02 Apr 2020.
    5. Olivier Gossner, 2020. "Group Testing against COVID-19," Working Papers 2020-02, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    6. Peijie Hou & Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher R. Bilder & Christopher S. McMahan, 2017. "Hierarchical group testing for multiple infections," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 656-665, June.
    7. Ely, Jeffrey & Galeotti, Andrea & Jann, Ole & Steiner, Jakub, 2021. "Optimal test allocation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Michael S. Black & Christopher R. Bilder & Joshua M. Tebbs, 2015. "Optimal retesting configurations for hierarchical group testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 693-710, August.
    9. Smriti Mallapaty, 2020. "The mathematical strategy that could transform coronavirus testing," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7817), pages 504-505, July.
    10. Hrayer Aprahamian & Ebru K. Bish & Douglas R. Bish, 2018. "Adaptive risk-based pooling in public health screening," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(9), pages 753-766, September.
    11. Megan Scudellari, 2020. "How Iceland hammered COVID with science," Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7835), pages 536-539, November.
    12. Hae-Young Kim & Michael G. Hudgens, 2009. "Three-Dimensional Array-Based Group Testing Algorithms," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 903-910, September.
    13. Douglas R Bish & Ebru K Bish & Hussein El-Hajj & Hrayer Aprahamian, 2021. "A robust pooled testing approach to expand COVID-19 screening capacity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Werner Dinkelbach, 1967. "On Nonlinear Fractional Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(7), pages 492-498, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ely, Jeffrey & Galeotti, Andrea & Jann, Ole & Steiner, Jakub, 2021. "Optimal test allocation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Lipnowski, Elliot & Ravid, Doron, 2021. "Pooled testing for quarantine decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Eslami, Keyvan & Lee, Hyunju, 2024. "Overreaction and the value of information in a pandemic," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Ramy Elitzur & Dmitry Krass & Eyal Zimlichman, 2023. "Machine learning for optimal test admission in the presence of resource constraints," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 279-300, June.
    5. Christian Gollier, 2020. "Cost–benefit analysis of age‐specific deconfinement strategies," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(6), pages 1746-1771, December.
    6. Christopher R. Bilder & Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher S. McMahan, 2019. "Informative group testing for multiplex assays," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 278-288, March.
    7. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    8. Koen B. Pouwels & Laurence S. J. Roope & Adrian Barnett & David J. Hunter & Terry M. Nolan & Philip M. Clarke, 2020. "Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Forward to the Past?," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 207-210, June.
    9. Rahul Deb & Mallesh Pai & Akhil Vohra & Rakesh Vohra, 2022. "Testing alone is insufficient," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(1), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Christelle Baunez & Mickael Degoulet & Stéphane Luchini & Patrick A. Pintus, 2020. "Sub-National Allocation of COVID-19 Tests: An Efficiency Criterion with an Application to Italian Regions," AMSE Working Papers 2011, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    11. Hanno Beck & Aloys Prinz & Elmar Wolfstetter, 2022. "Vaccination Gap, Vaccination Fraud and Inefficient Testing," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(5), pages 330-336, September.
    12. Vincent Brault & Bastien Mallein & Jean-François Rupprecht, 2021. "Group testing as a strategy for COVID-19 epidemiological monitoring and community surveillance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Hussein El Hajj & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish & Denise M. Kay, 2022. "Novel Pooling Strategies for Genetic Testing, with Application to Newborn Screening," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7994-8014, November.
    14. Lu Tang & Yiwang Zhou & Lili Wang & Soumik Purkayastha & Leyao Zhang & Jie He & Fei Wang & Peter X.‐K. Song, 2020. "A Review of Multi‐Compartment Infectious Disease Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 462-513, August.
    15. Karolina Drela & Agnieszka Malkowska & Anna Bera & Anna Tokarz-Kocik, 2021. "Instruments for Managing the EU Labour Market in the Face of the COVID-19 Crisis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 984-998.
    16. Tunjo Perić & Josip Matejaš & Zoran Babić, 2023. "Advantages, sensitivity and application efficiency of the new iterative method to solve multi-objective linear fractional programming problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(3), pages 751-767, September.
    17. Luca Consolini & Marco Locatelli & Jiulin Wang & Yong Xia, 2020. "Efficient local search procedures for quadratic fractional programming problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 201-232, May.
    18. Harald Dyckhoff & Katrin Allen, 1999. "Theoretische Begründung einer Effizienzanalyse mittels Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 411-436, May.
    19. Feng Guo & Liguo Jiao, 2023. "A new scheme for approximating the weakly efficient solution set of vector rational optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 905-930, August.
    20. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:27:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10729-024-09671-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.