IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0246285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust pooled testing approach to expand COVID-19 screening capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas R Bish
  • Ebru K Bish
  • Hussein El-Hajj
  • Hrayer Aprahamian

Abstract

Limited testing capacity for COVID-19 has hampered the pandemic response. Pooling is a testing method wherein samples from specimens (e.g., swabs) from multiple subjects are combined into a pool and screened with a single test. If the pool tests positive, then new samples from the collected specimens are individually tested, while if the pool tests negative, the subjects are classified as negative for the disease. Pooling can substantially expand COVID-19 testing capacity and throughput, without requiring additional resources. We develop a mathematical model to determine the best pool size for different risk groups, based on each group’s estimated COVID-19 prevalence. Our approach takes into consideration the sensitivity and specificity of the test, and a dynamic and uncertain prevalence, and provides a robust pool size for each group. For practical relevance, we also develop a companion COVID-19 pooling design tool (through a spread sheet). To demonstrate the potential value of pooling, we study COVID-19 screening using testing data from Iceland for the period, February-28-2020 to June-14-2020, for subjects stratified into high- and low-risk groups. We implement the robust pooling strategy within a sequential framework, which updates pool sizes each week, for each risk group, based on prior week’s testing data. Robust pooling reduces the number of tests, over individual testing, by 88.5% to 90.2%, and 54.2% to 61.9%, respectively, for the low-risk and high-risk groups (based on test sensitivity values in the range [0.71, 0.98] as reported in the literature). This results in much shorter times, on average, to get the test results compared to individual testing (due to the higher testing throughput), and also allows for expanded screening to cover more individuals. Thus, robust pooling can potentially be a valuable strategy for COVID-19 screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas R Bish & Ebru K Bish & Hussein El-Hajj & Hrayer Aprahamian, 2021. "A robust pooled testing approach to expand COVID-19 screening capacity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246285
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246285
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246285&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0246285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiayi Lin & Hrayer Aprahamian & George Golovko, 2024. "An optimization framework for large-scale screening under limited testing capacity with application to COVID-19," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 223-238, June.
    2. Michela Baccini & Emilia Rocco & Irene Paganini & Alessandra Mattei & Cristina Sani & Giulia Vannucci & Simonetta Bisanzi & Elena Burroni & Marco Peluso & Armelle Munnia & Filippo Cellai & Giampaolo P, 2021. "Pool testing on random and natural clusters of individuals: Optimisation of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the presence of low viral load samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Ramy Elitzur & Dmitry Krass & Eyal Zimlichman, 2023. "Machine learning for optimal test admission in the presence of resource constraints," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 279-300, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0246285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.