IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiapa/v36y2019i2d10.1007_s10490-017-9555-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotions, indigenous affective ties, and social network theory—The case of South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Inju Yang

    (EDC Paris Business School)

  • Sven Horak

    (St. John’s University)

Abstract

This study conceptually explores the structural and emotional aspects of informal social networks in South Korea by examining the indigenous concepts of jeong, woori, inmaek, and yongo in relation to the theories of social networks, social capital, and social exchange. We suggest extending extant knowledge of the latter by pursuing the geocentric integration of Eastern and Western schools of thought on crucial elements of social networks, chiefly by focusing on affective characteristics compared to the conventional and dominant focus on cognitive characteristics. Moreover, we highlight the dualistic nature of informal ties by adapting the notions of yin-yang and zhongyong. Based on the results of our analysis, we suggest explicitly integrating interpersonal affection and the role of emotions as the constituting elements of social network development and cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Inju Yang & Sven Horak, 2019. "Emotions, indigenous affective ties, and social network theory—The case of South Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 395-414, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:36:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10490-017-9555-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10490-017-9555-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10490-017-9555-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10490-017-9555-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Teagarden & Andreas Schotter, 2013. "Favor prevalence in emerging markets: A multi-level analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 447-460, June.
    2. Karl Aquino & Victoria Steisel & Avi Kay, 1992. "The Effects of Resource Distribution, Voice, and Decision Framing on the Provision of Public Goods," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 665-687, December.
    3. Peter Ping Li, 2014. "The Unique Value of Yin-Yang Balancing: A Critical Response," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 10(2), pages 321-332, July.
    4. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "A Psychological Perspective on Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 162-168, May.
    5. Fang, Tony, 2012. "Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 25-50, March.
    6. Andrew H. Van de Ven & Runtian Jing, 2012. "Indigenous Management Research in China from an Engaged Scholarship Perspective," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(1), pages 123-137, March.
    7. Li, Peter Ping, 2014. "The Unique Value of Yin-Yang Balancing: A Critical Response," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 321-332, July.
    8. Tony Fang, 2012. "Yin Yang: A New Perspective on Culture," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(1), pages 25-50, March.
    9. Long Zhang & Yulin Deng & Xin Zhang & Enhua Hu, 2016. "Why do Chinese employees build supervisor-subordinate guanxi? A motivational analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 617-648, September.
    10. Mr. Francis Fukuyama, 2000. "Social Capital and Civil Society," IMF Working Papers 2000/074, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Horak, Sven & Yang, Inju, 2016. "Affective networks, informal ties, and the limits of expatriate effectiveness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1030-1042.
    12. Sven Horak, 2018. "Join In or Opt Out? A Normative–Ethical Analysis of Affective Ties and Networks in South Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 207-220, April.
    13. Laura B. Cardinal & Sim B. Sitkin & Chris P. Long, 2004. "Balancing and Rebalancing in the Creation and Evolution of Organizational Control," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 411-431, August.
    14. Günter K. Stahl & Duncan N. Angwin & Philippe Very & Emanuel Gomes & Yaakov Weber & Shlomo Yedidia Tarba & Niels Noorderhaven & Haim Benyamini & Dave Bouckenooghe & Samia Chreim & Muriel Durand & Méla, 2013. "Sociocultural Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions: Unresolved Paradoxes and Directions for Future Research," Post-Print halshs-00862249, HAL.
    15. Sven Horak, 2014. "Antecedents and characteristics of informal relation-based networks in Korea: Yongo , Yonjul and Inmaek," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 78-108, January.
    16. Van de Ven, Andrew H. & Jing, Runtian, 2012. "Indigenous Management Research in China from an Engaged Scholarship Perspective," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 123-137, March.
    17. Sven Horak & Markus Taube, 2016. "Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo)," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 595-616, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hai Kyong Kim & Kibok Baik & Najung Kim, 2019. "How Korean Leadership Style Cultivates Employees’ Creativity and Voice in Hierarchical Organizations," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    2. Peter Ping Li & En Xie, 2019. "The unique research on the informal ties and social networks in East Asia: Diverse perspectives and new research agenda," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 305-319, June.
    3. Kim, Kon & Križnik, Blaž & Kamvasinou, Krystallia, 2021. "Between the state and citizens: Changing governance of intermediary organisations for inclusive and sustainable urban regeneration in Seoul," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Qin Li & Shuangning Lv & Jingya Cui & Yijun Liu & Zonghao Chen, 2024. "Research on the Public Environment Renewal of Traditional Villages Based on the Social Network Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Sven Horak & Yuliani Suseno, 2023. "Informal Networks, Informal Institutions, and Social Exclusion in the Workplace: Insights from Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations in Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 633-655, September.
    6. Zhang, Man & Hartley, Janet L. & AL-Husan, Faten Baddar & ALHussan, Fawaz Baddar, 2021. "Informal interorganizational business relationships and customer loyalty: Comparing Guanxi, Yongo, and Wasta," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Li, 2019. "Is “Yin-Yang balancing” superior to ambidexterity as an approach to paradox management?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 17-32, March.
    2. Mafico, Nkosana & Krzeminska, Anna & Härtel, Charmine & Keller, Josh, 2021. "The mirroring of intercultural and hybridity experiences: A study of African immigrant social entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    3. Fjellström, Daniella & Bai, Wensong & Oliveira, Luis & Fang, Tony, 2023. "Springboard internationalisation in times of geopolitical tensions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    4. Sven Horak & Yuliani Suseno, 2023. "Informal Networks, Informal Institutions, and Social Exclusion in the Workplace: Insights from Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations in Korea," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 633-655, September.
    5. Horak, Sven, 2013. "Cross-cultural experimental economics and indigenous management research: Issues and contributions," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 92/2013, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    6. Xin Li & Li Ma, 2020. "Chinese management research needs self-confidence but not over-confidence," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 481-498, June.
    7. Peter Ping Li & Tomoki Sekiguchi & Kevin Zhou, 2016. "The emerging research on indigenous management in Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 583-594, September.
    8. Ren, Monica & Gao, Hongzhi, 2023. "Chinese State-Owned Multinationals' (SOMNEs) Subsidiary nonmarket strategies in Selective De-globalization: An integrated perspective of co-evolution theory and the yin-yang frame," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    9. Long Zhang & Yulin Deng & Xin Zhang & Enhua Hu, 2016. "Why do Chinese employees build supervisor-subordinate guanxi? A motivational analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 617-648, September.
    10. Sven Horak & Markus Taube & Inju Yang & Katja Restel, 2019. "Two not of a kind: Social network theory and informal social networks in East Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 349-372, June.
    11. Zhang, Xiaotao & Liu, Yipeng & Tarba, Shlomo Y. & Giudice, Manlio Del, 2020. "The micro-foundations of strategic ambidexterity: Chinese cross-border M&As, Mid-View thinking and integration management," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    12. Zhang, Man & Hartley, Janet L. & AL-Husan, Faten Baddar & ALHussan, Fawaz Baddar, 2021. "Informal interorganizational business relationships and customer loyalty: Comparing Guanxi, Yongo, and Wasta," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    13. Peter Ping Li & En Xie, 2019. "The unique research on the informal ties and social networks in East Asia: Diverse perspectives and new research agenda," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 305-319, June.
    14. Horak, Sven & Klein, Andreas & Ahlstrom, David & Li, Xiaomei, 2024. "Resilience or decline of informal networks? Examining the role of trust context in network societies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    15. Sven Horak & Markus Taube, 2016. "Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo)," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 595-616, September.
    16. Godinho, Manuel Mira & Simões, Vítor Corado, 2023. "The Tech Cold War: What can we learn from the most dynamic patent classes?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    17. Lin Wu & Nachiappan Subramanian & Angappa Gunasekaran & Muhammad Dan‐Asabe Abdulrahman & Kulwant Singh Pawar & Des Doran, 2018. "A two‐dimensional, two‐level framework for achieving corporate sustainable development: Assessing the return on sustainability initiatives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1117-1130, December.
    18. Meine van Noordwijk, 2021. "Agroforestry-Based Ecosystem Services: Reconciling Values of Humans and Nature in Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Lee, Jong Min & Paik, Yongsun & Horak, Sven & Yang, Inju, 2022. "Turning a liability into an asset of foreignness: Managing informal networks in Korea," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 351-364.
    20. McSweeney Brendan & Brown Donna & Iliopoulou Stravroula, 2016. "Claiming too much, delivering too little: testing some of Hofstede’s generalisations," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 35(1), pages 34-57, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:36:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10490-017-9555-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.