IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijba11/v5y2014i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional Flexibility in Human Resource Management Systems: Conceptualization and Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Fernandez-Perez de la Lastra
  • Fernando Martin-Alcazar
  • Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey

Abstract

In spite of its strategic relevance, functional flexibility has still not been clearly defined by the literature. Drawing on different conceptualizations and measurement tools, empirical studies have reached different and even contradictory findings. This paper proposes a construct to define and measure functional flexibility in the field of Human Resource Management. In doing so, we will try to clarify this concept, classifying previous definitions and contributing with an integrative conceptualization. In the first part of this work we discuss and justify the need for certain level of functional flexibility in human resource management systems, which helps the organization to improve its capacity to adaptat to current environments. From this point of view, this capacity is considered as a relevant source of competitive advantage. Drawing on our theoretical analysis, we propose a new functional flexibility construct and a measurement model that could help to develop deeper analysis on this topic. This construct would serve as a starting point in the definition of a measurement scale for functional flexibility. Future research lines derived from this analysis are discussed in the last section of the paper. Specifically, we discuss the need to analyse how exploration and exploitation of human capital can be combined in flexible human resource management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Fernandez-Perez de la Lastra & Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2014. "Functional Flexibility in Human Resource Management Systems: Conceptualization and Measurement," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/3999/2356
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/3999
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne L. Kalleberg, 2001. "Organizing Flexibility: The Flexible Firm in a New Century," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 479-504, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahid Yousaf & Maria Palazzo, 2023. "Influential role of homophily on innovative work behavior: evidence from innovation management of SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1239-1256, September.
    2. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & García-Lillo, Francisco, 2018. "High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 397-406.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John S. Heywood & W.S. Siebert & Xiangdong Wei, 2011. "Estimating the Use of Agency Workers: Can Family-Friendly Practices Reduce Their Use?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 535-564, July.
    2. Philippe Askenazy & Clément Brébion & Pierre Courtioux & Christine Erhel & Malo Mofakhami, 2023. "HRM Strategies in Response to the First Covid Lockdown: a Typology of French Workplaces," CEPN Working Papers hal-03953817, HAL.
    3. Hafid Ballafkih & Joop Zinsmeister & Martha Meerman, 2017. "A Job and a Sufficient Income Is Not Enough: The Needs of the Dutch Precariat," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, December.
    4. Bruno Frey, 2013. "European unification: a new proposal," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 285-294, December.
    5. Giulio Pedrini, 2020. "Off‐the‐job training and the shifting role of part‐time and temporary employment across institutional models. Comparing Italian and British firms," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 427-453, September.
    6. Pantic-Dragisic, Svjetlana & Söderlund, Jonas, 2020. "Swift transition and knowledge cycling: Key capabilities for successful technical and engineering consulting?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    7. Adam Seth Litwin & Sherry M. Tanious, 2021. "Information Technology, Business Strategy and the Reassignment of Work from In‐House Employees to Agency Temps," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 816-847, September.
    8. Alpha Kaleb Gill & Danish Siddiqui, 2020. "How Flexible Work Arrangements Affects Affective Organizational Commitment, and Work-Life Enrichment in Pakistan¡¯s Service Industry: The Role of Time Planning, Work-Life Conflict, and Engagement," Human Resource Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 269-313, December.
    9. Daniele Di Nunzio, 2018. "L?azione sindacale nell?organizzazione flessibile e digitale del lavoro," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 77-92.
    10. repec:cte:wbrepe:wb083007 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jos Gamble & Qihai Huang, 2009. "One Store, Two Employment Systems: Core, Periphery and Flexibility in China's Retail Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Smirnykh, Larisa & Wörgötter, Andreas, 2019. "The importance of institutional and organizational characteristics for the use of fixed-term contracts in Russia," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(1), pages 89-121.
    13. Guido Strunk, 2009. "Operationalizing Career Complexity," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 20(3), pages 294-311.
    14. Raul Ruubel, 2021. "Time Dimensions of Job Autonomy in Estonian R&D Institutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1079-1099, September.
    15. Dimitris Pavlopoulos & Katja Chkalova, 2022. "Short-time work: A bridge to employment security or a springboard to unemployment?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 168-197, February.
    16. Elisabetta Magnani & David Prentice, 2010. "Outsourcing And Unionization: A Tale Of Misallocated (Resistance) Resources," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(2), pages 460-482, April.
    17. Kozica, Arjan & Kaiser, Stephan, 2012. "A Sustainability Perspective on Flexible HRM: How to Cope with Paradoxes of Contingent Work," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 239-261.
    18. Imanol Nunez & Ilias Livanos, 2015. "Temps “by choice”? An Investigation of the Reasons Behind Temporary Employment Among Young Workers in Europe," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 44-66, March.
    19. Anne Delarue & Stijn Gryp & Geert Van Hootegem, 2006. "The quest for a balanced manpower capacity: different flexibility strategies examined," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 2(2), pages 69-86, November.
    20. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    21. Ruiner, Caroline & Wilkens, Uta & Kuepper, Monika, 2013. "Patterns of Organizational Flexibility in Knowledge-intensive Firms – Going Beyond Existing Concepts," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(3), pages 162-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.