IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v19y2023i3d10.1007_s11365-023-00865-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influential role of homophily on innovative work behavior: evidence from innovation management of SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Zahid Yousaf

    (Higher Education Department, Government College of Management Sciences)

  • Maria Palazzo

    (Universitas Mercatorum)

Abstract

In the rapidly changing market environment, innovative work behavior plays an important role in improving small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) efficiency and competitiveness. SME success depends on its employees’ ability to innovate. Until now, innovation studies have not examined the role of homophily in improving innovative work behavior. For this reason, the study aims to examine how homophily enhances innovative work behavior through the mediating role of job excitement and the moderating role of employee flexibility. For the current study, data were collected from 423 SME respondents using a cross-sectional method. Findings show that homophily positively influences work behavior of SMEs’ members. Furthermore, results show that job excitement mediating role and employee functional flexibility moderating role affect the relation between homophily and innovative behavior. The current study contributes to existing knowledge by investigating how homophily affects employees’ innovative work behavior. In addition, a moderating role for employee functional flexibility and a mediating role of job excitement were also tested in this study to determine how homophily can influence innovative work behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahid Yousaf & Maria Palazzo, 2023. "Influential role of homophily on innovative work behavior: evidence from innovation management of SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1239-1256, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00865-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-023-00865-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-023-00865-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-023-00865-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stock, Ruth, 2015. "Is Boreout a Threat to Frontline Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 76766, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Jeroen de Jong & Deanne Den Hartog, 2008. "Innovative Work Behaviour: Measurement and Validation," Scales Research Reports H200820, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    3. Angelo Mele, 2022. "A Structural Model of Homophily and Clustering in Social Networks," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 1377-1389, June.
    4. Susana Fernandez-Perez de la Lastra & Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2014. "Functional Flexibility in Human Resource Management Systems: Conceptualization and Measurement," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Yu-Te Liu, 2019. "Exploring the role of original aspiration in effectuation tendency," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 977-1016, September.
    6. Micevski, Milena & Dewsnap, Belinda & Cadogan, John W. & Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma & Boso, Nathaniel, 2019. "Sales intra-functional flexibility: Its relationship to performance and moderating effects on role stressors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 552-562.
    7. Daojuan Wang & Thomas Schøtt, 2022. "Coupling between financing and innovation in a startup: embedded in networks with investors and researchers," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 327-347, March.
    8. Karen van Dam, 2003. "Understanding experts' attitudes towards functional flexibility," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 138-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Mo & Tao, Changqi & Zou, Xianya, 2024. "How do technology and institutional adaptability promote sustainable economic entrepreneurship and growth?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyngdoh, Teidorlang & Chefor, Ellis & Hochstein, Bryan & Britton, Benjamin P. & Amyx, Douglas, 2021. "A systematic literature review of negative psychological states and behaviors in sales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 518-533.
    2. Hanan S. AlEssa & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2022. "Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1171-1208, December.
    3. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    4. Gaonkar, Shweta & Mele, Angelo, 2023. "A model of inter-organizational network formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 82-104.
    5. Sylvia Hubner & Fabian Most & Jochen Wirtz & Christine Auer, 2022. "Narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems: drivers of effectuation versus causation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 211-242, June.
    6. Ki-Seoung Lee & Yoon-Seo Kim & Hyoung-Chul Shin, 2022. "The Effect of Personal Environment Suitability and Work Environment of Luxury Hotels on Psychological Capital and Innovation Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Raasch, Christina, 2018. "Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 687-699.
    8. Moeller, Julia & Ivcevic, Zorana & White, Arielle E. & Menges, Jochen & Brackett, Marc A., 2018. "Highly Engaged but Burned Out: Intra-Individual Profiles in the US Workforce," OSF Preprints h6qnf, Center for Open Science.
    9. Josu Santos‐Larrazabal & Imanol Basterretxea, 2022. "Intercooperation, flexicurity and their impact on workers: The case of Fagor Electrodomésticos," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 607-635, September.
    10. Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Chin Hsiu Huang & Tzu-An Lin, 2018. "Organizational intellectual capital and its relation to frontline service employee innovative behavior: consumer value co-creation behavior as a moderator," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 663-684, December.
    11. Scott C. Manley & Joseph F. Hair & Ralph I. Williams & William C. McDowell, 2021. "Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1805-1825, December.
    12. Hina Jawaid Kalyal & Erik Berntson & Stephan Baraldi & Katharina Näswall & Magnus Sverke, 2010. "The moderating role of employability on the relationship between job insecurity and commitment to change," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(3), pages 327-344, August.
    13. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & García-Lillo, Francisco, 2018. "High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 397-406.
    14. Daniela Carlucci & Matteo Mura & Giovanni Schiuma, 2019. "Fostering Employees’ Innovative Work Behaviour In Healthcare Organisations," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Bradonjic, Philip & Franke, Nikolaus & Lüthje, Christian, 2019. "Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1354-1361.
    17. Mueller, Christoph E., 2023. "Explaining the stage of product in pre-seed academic startup ventures: An empirical analysis using monitoring data from a German startup support program," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    18. Nawal Abdalla Adam, 2022. "Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior and Change Management Phases in Government Institutions: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Mochamad Rizki & Ryani Dhyan Parashakti & Lisnatiawati Saragih, 2019. "The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture Towards Employees’ Innovative Behaviour and Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 227-239.
    20. Scott C. Manley & Joseph F. Hair & Ralph I. Williams & William C. McDowell, 0. "Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00865-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.