IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormoor/v42y2017i3p745-761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Matroids Are Immune to Braess’ Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Satoru Fujishige

    (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan)

  • Michel X. Goemans

    (Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Tobias Harks

    (Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Britta Peis

    (School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, 52072 Aachen, Germany)

  • Rico Zenklusen

    (Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218)

Abstract

The famous Braess paradox describes the counterintuitive phenomenon in which, in certain settings, an increase of resources, such as a new road built within a congested network, may in fact lead to larger costs for the players in an equilibrium. In this paper, we consider general nonatomic congestion games and give a characterization of the combinatorial property of strategy spaces for which the Braess paradox does not occur. In short, matroid bases are precisely the required structure. We prove this characterization by two novel sensitivity results for convex separable optimization problems over polymatroid base polyhedra, which may be of independent interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoru Fujishige & Michel X. Goemans & Tobias Harks & Britta Peis & Rico Zenklusen, 2017. "Matroids Are Immune to Braess’ Paradox," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 745-761, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:42:y:2017:i:3:p:745-761
    DOI: 10.1287/moor.2016.0825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2016.0825
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/moor.2016.0825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dafermos, Stella & Nagurney, Anna, 1984. "On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 101-110, April.
    2. Umang Bhaskar & Lisa Fleischer & Darrell Hoy & Chien-Chung Huang, 2015. "On the Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Atomic Splittable Routing Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 634-654, March.
    3. Epstein, Amir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Efficient graph topologies in network routing games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-125, May.
    4. Roughgarden, Tim & Schoppmann, Florian, 2015. "Local smoothness and the price of anarchy in splittable congestion games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 317-342.
    5. Milchtaich, Igal, 2006. "Network topology and the efficiency of equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 321-346, November.
    6. José R. Correa & Andreas S. Schulz & Nicolás E. Stier-Moses, 2004. "Selfish Routing in Capacitated Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 961-976, November.
    7. Richard Steinberg & Willard I. Zangwill, 1983. "The Prevalence of Braess' Paradox," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-318, August.
    8. Igal Milchtaich, 2005. "Topological Conditions for Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 225-244, February.
    9. Roberto Cominetti & José R. Correa & Nicolás E. Stier-Moses, 2009. "The Impact of Oligopolistic Competition in Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1421-1437, December.
    10. Oran Richman & Nahum Shimkin, 2007. "Topological Uniqueness of the Nash Equilibrium for Selfish Routing with Atomic Users," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 215-232, February.
    11. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    12. Holzman, Ron & Law-Yone, Nissan, 1997. "Strong Equilibrium in Congestion Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 21(1-2), pages 85-101, October.
    13. Holzman, Ron & Law-yone (Lev-tov), Nissan, 2003. "Network structure and strong equilibrium in route selection games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-205, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cominetti, Roberto & Dose, Valerio & Scarsini, Marco, 2024. "Monotonicity of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 754-766.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epstein, Amir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Efficient graph topologies in network routing games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 115-125, May.
    2. Xujin Chen & Zhuo Diao & Xiaodong Hu, 2022. "On weak Pareto optimality of nonatomic routing networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1705-1723, October.
    3. Epstein, Amir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 51-68, September.
    4. Xujin Chen & Zhuo Diao & Xiaodong Hu, 0. "On weak Pareto optimality of nonatomic routing networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    5. Igal Milchtaich, 2015. "Network topology and equilibrium existence in weighted network congestion games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 515-541, August.
    6. T. Werth & H. Sperber & S. Krumke, 2014. "Computation of equilibria and the price of anarchy in bottleneck congestion games," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 22(4), pages 687-712, December.
    7. Cheng Wan, 2016. "Strategic decentralization in binary choice composite congestion games," Post-Print hal-02885837, HAL.
    8. Wan, Cheng, 2016. "Strategic decentralization in binary choice composite congestion games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 531-542.
    9. Igal Milchtaich, 2021. "Internalization of social cost in congestion games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 717-760, March.
    10. Yao, Jia & Cheng, Ziyi & Chen, Anthony, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the traffic paradoxes (1968–2022)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Ron Holzman & Dov Monderer, 2015. "Strong equilibrium in network congestion games: increasing versus decreasing costs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 647-666, August.
    12. Milchtaich, Igal, 2006. "Network topology and the efficiency of equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 321-346, November.
    13. Tobias Harks & Veerle Timmermans, 2018. "Uniqueness of equilibria in atomic splittable polymatroid congestion games," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 812-830, October.
    14. Raimondo, Roberto, 2020. "Pathwise smooth splittable congestion games and inefficiency," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 15-23.
    15. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2021. "The effect of modern traffic information on Braess’ paradox," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    16. Cominetti, Roberto & Dose, Valerio & Scarsini, Marco, 2024. "Monotonicity of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 754-766.
    17. Shanjiang Zhu & David Levinson & Henry Liu, 2017. "Measuring winners and losers from the new I-35W Mississippi River Bridge," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 905-918, September.
    18. Marco Scarsini & Tristan Tomala, 2012. "Repeated congestion games with bounded rationality," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(3), pages 651-669, August.
    19. Thanasis Lianeas & Evdokia Nikolova & Nicolas E. Stier-Moses, 2019. "Risk-Averse Selfish Routing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 38-57, February.
    20. Umang Bhaskar & Lisa Fleischer & Darrell Hoy & Chien-Chung Huang, 2015. "On the Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Atomic Splittable Routing Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 634-654, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormoor:v:42:y:2017:i:3:p:745-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.