IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v15y2021i3p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Performance of Foresight Studies: Evidence from the Egyptian Energy Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Yomna Atef Ahmed

    (Nile University)

  • ElHassan Anas ElSabry

    (Nile University)

Abstract

This academic paper aims to evaluate the Egyptian Energy Foresight Project "Egypt LEAPS" by assessing both the efficiency of its process and the accuracy of its foresight outcomes in the fields of solar energy, energy efficiency, and fossil fuels. The study employs a two-part approach. Part 1 evaluates the efficiency of the Egypt LEAPS process by collecting expert opinions through an online survey. Part 2 assesses the accuracy of foresight outcomes by comparing original forecasted realization times with expert opinions gathered in this study. The study reveals that experts expressed satisfaction with the energy topics discussed during the foresight exercise and the overall experience. In terms of foresight outcomes, a mixed picture emerged, with successes and failures. Notably, energy efficiency predictions showed a higher failure rate due to its interdisciplinary nature. The study emphasizes the importance of validating and assessing foresight projects to improve their effectiveness in guiding decision-making. It underscores the need for continuous government support and expert engagement in such initiatives. This research contributes to the understanding of technology foresight, offering practical insights for policymakers and stakeholders involved in similar projects. It underscores the value of evaluating and refining foresight processes to ensure their relevance and impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Yomna Atef Ahmed & ElHassan Anas ElSabry, 2024. "Evaluating the Performance of Foresight Studies: Evidence from the Egyptian Energy Sector," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 18(1), pages 69-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:15:y:2021:i:3:p:69-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/2024-18-1/905797188.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2024/04/11/2141283691/6-El-Sabry-69-79.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    2. Robin M. Hogarth & Spyros Makridakis, 1981. "Forecasting and Planning: An Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, February.
    3. Daniel Kimuli & Resty Nabaterega & Noble Banadda & Isa Kabenge & Adipala Ekwamu & Paul Nampala, 2017. "Advanced Education and Training Programs to Support Renewable Energy Investment in Africa," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 5(1), pages 8-15.
    4. Daniel Kimuli & Resty Nabaterega & Noble Banadda & Isa Kabenge & Adipala Ekwamu & Paul Nampala, 2017. "Advanced Education and Training Programs to Support Renewable Energy Investment in Africa," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 5(1), pages 8-15.
    5. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Apreda, Riccardo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2020. "Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Muhammad Haseeb & Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin & Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye & Nira Hariyatie Hartani, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Economic Well-Being of Malaysia: Fresh Evidence from Auto Regressive Distributed Lag Bound Testing Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 269-275.
    3. Miklánek, Tomáš & Zajíček, Miroslav, 2020. "Personal traits and trading in an experimental asset market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Ramzi Boussaidi, 2022. "Implications of the overconfidence bias in presence of private information: Evidence from MENA stock markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3660-3678, July.
    5. Gerardo Sabater-Grande & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Noemí Herranz-Zarzoso, 2023. "Goals and guesses as reference points: a field experiment on student performance," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 249-274, February.
    6. Gignac, Gilles E., 2024. "Rethinking the Dunning-Kruger effect: Negligible influence on a limited segment of the population," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Kovacs, Roxanne J. & Lagarde, Mylene & Cairns, John, 2020. "Overconfident health workers provide lower quality healthcare," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Wookjae Heo & Abed G. Rabbani & Jae Min Lee, 2021. "Mediation between financial risk tolerance and equity ownership: assessing the role of financial knowledge underconfidence," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 169-180, September.
    9. Xingwei Wang & Liang Guo, 2021. "How to Promote University Students to Innovative Use Renewable Energy? An Inquiry-Based Learning Course Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Yao, Zheying & Rabbani, Abed G., 2021. "Association between investment risk tolerance and portfolio risk: The role of confidence level," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    11. Gregory A. Baker & Joel K. Leidecker, 2001. "Does it pay to plan?: Strategic planning and financial performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 355-364.
    12. Leitner, Johannes & Leopold-Wildburger, Ulrike, 2011. "Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information - A review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 459-469, September.
    13. Dean Tjosvold, 1998. "Using and Valuing Accounting Information: Joint Decision Making Between Accountants and Retail Managers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 327-345, July.
    14. Daniel Feiler & Jordan Tong, 2022. "From Noise to Bias: Overconfidence in New Product Forecasting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4685-4702, June.
    15. Patrick Afflerbach & Christopher Dun & Henner Gimpel & Dominik Parak & Johannes Seyfried, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Wisdom of Crowds Phenomenon in Aggregating Expert Judgment," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 329-348, August.
    16. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    17. Goodwin, Paul, 2002. "Integrating management judgment and statistical methods to improve short-term forecasts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 127-135, April.
    18. Blanc, Sebastian M. & Setzer, Thomas, 2015. "Analytical debiasing of corporate cash flow forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 1004-1015.
    19. Sroginis, Anna & Fildes, Robert & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2023. "Use of contextual and model-based information in adjusting promotional forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1177-1191.
    20. Midtgård, Kenneth & Selart, Marcus, 2024. "The cognitive perspective in strategic choice," SocArXiv 4xpza, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foresight assessment; energy foresight; evidence-based policy; energy transition; renewable energy systems; strategies; futures studies; technology foresight; scenario planning; renewable energy; environmental aspects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:15:y:2021:i:3:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.