IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v31y2022i1p259-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronic Disease Progression Prediction: Leveraging Case‐Based Reasoning and Big Data Analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Zlatana Nenova
  • Jennifer Shang

Abstract

Physicians caring for chronically ill individuals need to predict patients' disease progression, as accurate disease projections can facilitate better treatment decisions. The power of prediction is prevention, as it is easier to prevent than to reverse. In this research, we propose a data‐driven model for accurate and fast disease trajectory prediction, using electronic health records (EHRs) from Veterans Affairs Hospitals. EHRs contain tremendous amount of frequently updated, highly dimensional and not equally spaced data in diverse formats (e.g., numeric, textual, images, and videos). We propose an intelligent case‐based reasoning (iCBR) approach to better predict kidney disease progression, which can help prevent patients' health deterioration and prolong lives. Our iCBR contributes to the literature by enhancing the automation and personalization capabilities of the conventional case‐based reasoning (CBR). Through the iCBR, we advance the utilization of patient's laboratory data, vital sign, clinic visit, and comorbidity information. We examine (1) if the number of cases chosen for predicting the new patient's disease progression should be tailored, and (2) what the best number of prediction cases should be if customization is warranted. We link the number of cases selected for disease prediction with patient's disease characteristics. By comparing the results of the iCBR and popular machine learning and statistics models adapted to our problem, we find that the iCBR outperforms other methods. While the proposed model is applied to patients with chronic kidney disease, it can be readily applied to other chronic diseases such as diabetes, due to its similar data structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Zlatana Nenova & Jennifer Shang, 2022. "Chronic Disease Progression Prediction: Leveraging Case‐Based Reasoning and Big Data Analytics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 259-280, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:259-280
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13532
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent Moritz & Enno Siemsen & Mirko Kremer, 2014. "Judgmental Forecasting: Cognitive Reflection and Decision Speed," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(7), pages 1146-1160, July.
    2. Ruomeng Cui & Santiago Gallino & Antonio Moreno & Dennis J. Zhang, 2018. "The Operational Value of Social Media Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(10), pages 1749-1769, October.
    3. Hee-Seok Oh & Douglas W. Nychka & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2007. "The Role of Pseudo Data for Robust Smoothing with Application to Wavelet Regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(4), pages 893-904.
    4. Robert Thorndike, 1953. "Who belongs in the family?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(4), pages 267-276, December.
    5. Jonathan E. Helm & Adel Alaeddini & Jon M. Stauffer & Kurt M. Bretthauer & Ted A. Skolarus, 2016. "Reducing Hospital Readmissions by Integrating Empirical Prediction with Resource Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(2), pages 233-257, February.
    6. Young‐Ju Kim & Chong Gu, 2004. "Smoothing spline Gaussian regression: more scalable computation via efficient approximation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 337-356, May.
    7. Chris P. Lee & Glenn M. Chertow & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2008. "Optimal Initiation and Management of Dialysis Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1428-1449, December.
    8. Chris P. Lee & Glenn M. Chertow & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2006. "A Simulation Model to Estimate the Cost and Effectiveness of Alternative Dialysis Initiation Strategies," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(5), pages 535-549, September.
    9. Oguzhan Alagoz & Cindy L. Bryce & Steven Shechter & Andrew Schaefer & Chung-Chou H. Chang & Derek C. Angus & Mark S. Roberts, 2005. "Incorporating Biological Natural History in Simulation Models: Empirical Estimates of the Progression of End-Stage Liver Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 620-632, November.
    10. Robin M. Hogarth & Spyros Makridakis, 1981. "Forecasting and Planning: An Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, February.
    11. Lauren F. Laker & Craig M. Froehle & Jaime B. Windeler & Christopher John Lindsell, 2018. "Quality and Efficiency of the Clinical Decision‐Making Process: Information Overload and Emphasis Framing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(12), pages 2213-2225, December.
    12. Charles E. Phelps, 1992. "Diffusion of Information in Medical Care," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 23-42, Summer.
    13. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2015. "Waiting Patiently: An Empirical Study of Queue Abandonment in an Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 39-59, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zlatana Nenova & Jennifer Shang, 2022. "Personalized Chronic Disease Follow‐Up Appointments: Risk‐Stratified Care Through Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 583-606, February.
    2. Arvan, Meysam & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen & Siemsen, Enno, 2019. "Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 237-252.
    3. Diwas Singh KC & Stefan Scholtes & Christian Terwiesch, 2020. "Empirical Research in Healthcare Operations: Past Research, Present Understanding, and Future Opportunities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 73-83, January.
    4. Zaiyan Wei & Mo Xiao & Rong Rong, 2021. "Network Size and Content Generation on Social Media Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1406-1426, May.
    5. Perera, H. Niles & Hurley, Jason & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen, 2019. "The human factor in supply chain forecasting: A systematic review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 574-600.
    6. Violetta Bacon-Gerasymenko & Russell Coff & Rodolphe Durand, 2016. "Taking a Second Look in a Warped Crystal Ball: Explaining the Accuracy of Revised Forecasts," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1292-1319, December.
    7. Suresh P. Sethi & Sushil Gupta & Vipin K. Agrawal & Vijay K. Agrawal, 2022. "Nobel laureates’ contributions to and impacts on operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4283-4303, December.
    8. Abolghasemi, Mahdi & Hurley, Jason & Eshragh, Ali & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2020. "Demand forecasting in the presence of systematic events: Cases in capturing sales promotions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Khosrowabadi, Naghmeh & Hoberg, Kai & Imdahl, Christina, 2022. "Evaluating human behaviour in response to AI recommendations for judgemental forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1151-1167.
    10. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović, 2017. "Personalized queues: the customer view, via a fluid model of serving least-patient first," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 23-53, October.
    11. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    12. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    13. Currie, Janet & Fahr, John, 2005. "Medicaid managed care: effects on children's Medicaid coverage and utilization," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 85-108, January.
    14. Becken, Susanne & Stantic, Bela & Chen, Jinyan & Connolly, Rod M., 2022. "Twitter conversations reveal issue salience of aviation in the broader context of climate change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Gregory A. Baker & Joel K. Leidecker, 2001. "Does it pay to plan?: Strategic planning and financial performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 355-364.
    16. Longhi, Christian & Musolesi, Antonio & Baumont, Catherine, 2014. "Modeling structural change in the European metropolitan areas during the process of economic integration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 395-407.
    17. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    18. Ryan W. Buell, 2017. "Last Place Aversion in Queues," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-053, Harvard Business School, revised Oct 2019.
    19. Archana R. Panhalkar & Dharmpal D. Doye, 2020. "An approach of improving decision tree classifier using condensed informative data," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 431-445, December.
    20. Michele Cincera, 2005. "Firms' productivity growth and R&D spillovers: An analysis of alternative technological proximity measures," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 657-682.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:259-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.