IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1928-d116275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Co-Word Analysis of Organizational Constraints for Maintaining Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Daoyan Guo

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ruyin Long

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hui Lu

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Qianyi Long

    (The Baskin School of Engineering, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA)

Abstract

A good understanding of organizational constraints is vital to facilitate organizational development as the sustainable development of organizations can be constrained by the organization itself. In this study, bibliometric methods were adopted to investigate the research status and trends of organizational constraints. The findings showed that there were 1138 articles and reviews, and 52 high-frequency keywords related to organizational constraints during the period 1980–2016. The research cores were “constraints”, “learning”, “institution”, and “behavior” in the co-occurrence network, and “constraints” played the most significant role. The 52 high-frequency keywords were classified into six clusters: “change and decision-making”, “supply chain and sustainability”, “human system and performance”, “culture and relations”, “entrepreneur and resource”, and “learning and innovation”. Furthermore, the indicators of organizational development (e.g., innovation, supply chain, decision-making, performance, sustainability, and employee behavior) were found to be significantly related to the organizational constraints. Based on these findings, future trends were proposed to maintain the sustainability of organizations. This study investigated the state of the art in terms of organizational constraints and provided valuable references for maintaining the sustainable development of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daoyan Guo & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Hui Lu & Qianyi Long, 2017. "A Co-Word Analysis of Organizational Constraints for Maintaining Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1928-:d:116275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evan Thomas & Bernard Amadei, 2010. "Accounting for human behavior, local conditions and organizational constraints in humanitarian development models," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 313-327, June.
    2. Lori Rosenkopf & Paul Almeida, 2003. "Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 751-766, June.
    3. Huseyin Kalyoncu, 2005. "Fiscal policy sustainability: test of intertemporal borrowing constraints," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(15), pages 957-962.
    4. Amalia Stafyla & Georgia Kaltsidou & Nikolaos Spyridis, 2013. "Gender differences in work stress, related to organizational conflicts and organizational constrains: An empirical research," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 6(1), pages 91-101, April.
    5. Benito Arruñada & Luis Vázquez & Giorgio Zanarone, 2009. "Institutional constraints on organizations: the case of Spanish car dealerships," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 15-26.
    6. Hung, Kam & Petrick, James F., 2012. "Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: An alternative decision-making model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 855-867.
    7. Steel, Robert P. & Mento, Anthony J., 1986. "Impact of situational constraints on subjective and objective criteria of managerial job performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 254-265, April.
    8. Carlos Benavides-Velasco & Cristina Quintana-García & Vanesa Guzmán-Parra, 2013. "Trends in family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-57, January.
    9. Dirk Czarnitzki, 2006. "Research And Development In Small And Medium‐Sized Enterprises: The Role Of Financial Constraints And Public Funding," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 53(3), pages 335-357, July.
    10. Wei Zhang & Qingpu Zhang & Bo Yu & Limei Zhao, 2015. "Knowledge map of creativity research based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 1992–2011," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1023-1038, May.
    11. Yvrande-Billon, Anne & Menard, Claude, 2005. "Institutional constraints and organizational changes: the case of the British rail reform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 675-699, April.
    12. Anderton, Douglas L. & Conaty, Joseph & Miller, George A., 1983. "Structural constraints on organizational change: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 153-170, June.
    13. Olga De Marco Larrauri & David Pérez Neira & Marta Soler Montiel, 2016. "Indicators for the Analysis of Peasant Women’s Equity and Empowerment Situations in a Sustainability Framework: A Case Study of Cacao Production in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Hirth, Stefan & Viswanatha, Marc, 2011. "Financing constraints, cash-flow risk, and corporate investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1496-1509.
    15. Pinkse, Jonatan & Kolk, Ans, 2007. "Multinational Corporations and Emissions Trading:: Strategic Responses to New Institutional Constraints," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 441-452, December.
    16. Saeed Samiee, 1984. "Transnational Data Flow Constraints: A New Challenge for Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 15(1), pages 141-150, March.
    17. Matthias Finger & Rolf Künneke, 2011. "Introduction," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Simone Maier & Matthias Finger, 2001. "Constraints to organizational change processes regarding the introduction of organic products: case findings from the Swiss food industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 89-99, March.
    19. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    20. Vincenzo Perrone & Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily, 2003. "Free to Be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 422-439, August.
    21. Catherine Durnell Cramton, 2001. "The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 346-371, June.
    22. Tahereh Dehdarirad & Anna Villarroya & Maite Barrios, 2014. "Research trends in gender differences in higher education and science: a co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 273-290, October.
    23. Shaker A. Zahra & Harry J. Sapienza & Per Davidsson, 2006. "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 917-955, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung-Ho Shin & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Xiao Ruan & Prem Chhetri & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Shahrooz Shahparvari, 2018. "Analyzing Sustainability Literature in Maritime Studies with Text Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    2. I-Cheng Chang & Jeou-Shyan Horng & Chih-Hsing Liu & Sheng-Fang Chou & Tai-Yi Yu, 2022. "Exploration of Topic Classification in the Tourism Field with Text Mining Technology—A Case Study of the Academic Journal Papers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Letizia Tebaldi & Barbara Bigliardi & Eleonora Bottani, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain and Innovation: A Review of the Recent Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Ilona Pietryka & Adam Kozakiewicz, 2020. "Cloud Computing and Energy Efficiency: Mapping the Thematic Structure of Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Bei Liu & Hong Chen & Xinru Huang, 2018. "Map Changes and Theme Evolution in Work Hours: A Co-Word Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Ludovica Moi, 2021. "Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: conceptualizing through co-words," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2821-2863, April.
    2. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Luca Naitana, 2019. "What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 407-437, February.
    3. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    4. Hung, Shiu-Wan & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Hou, Chen-En & Chen, Nai-Rong, 2021. "Inclusion in global virtual teams: Exploring non-spatial proximity and knowledge sharing on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 599-610.
    5. Wagner, Stefan & Goossen, Martin C., 2018. "Knowing me, knowing you: inventor mobility and the formation of technology-oriented alliances," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    6. Faraji, Omid & Ezadpour, Mostafa & Rahrovi Dastjerdi, Alireza & Dolatzarei, Ehsan, 2022. "Conceptual structure of balanced scorecard research: A co-word analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Yingping Mai & Yenchun Jim Wu & Yu-Min Wang, 2022. "How Does Entrepreneurial Team Relational Governance Promote Social Start-Ups’ Organizational Resilience?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Felipe Monteiro & Julian Birkinshaw, 2017. "The external knowledge sourcing process in multinational corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 342-362, February.
    9. Jiuchang Wei & Wanling Zhan & Xiumei Guo & Dora Marinova, 2017. "Public attention to the great smog event: a case study of the 2013 smog event in Harbin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 923-938, November.
    10. José Albors-Garrigos & José L. Hervas-Oliver, 2011. "Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers," Working Papers. Serie EC 2011-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    11. Frances Drake & Martin Purvis & Jane Hunt, 2004. "Meeting the environmental challenge: a case of win–win or lose–win? A study of the UK baking and refrigeration industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 172-186, May.
    12. A. A. H. (Arnoud) Smit & Peter P. J. Driessen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "Constraints on the conversion to sustainable production: the case of the Dutch potato chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(6), pages 369-381, September.
    13. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng Kok & Michelle O’Shea, 2018. "Family Businesses and Adaptation: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 683-698, December.
    14. Barbara Kump, 2021. "When do threats mobilize managers for organizational change toward sustainability? An environmental belief model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2713-2726, July.
    15. James Hayton & Ubaldo Macchitella, 2013. "HRM, organizational culture and entrepreneurial capabilities: The role of individual and collective knowledge processes," Research Papers 0005, Enterprise Research Centre.
    16. Rui Yang & Guoming Du & Ziwei Duan & Mengjin Du & Xin Miao & Yanhong Tang, 2020. "Knowledge System Analysis on Emergency Management of Public Health Emergencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Knoben, Joris & Bakker, Rene M., 2019. "The guppy and the whale: Relational pluralism and start-ups' expropriation dilemma in partnership formation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 103-121.
    18. Priyono Anjar & Dewi Elisabeth Ingga & Lim Sarina Abdul Halim, 2019. "Alliances as Dynamic Capability to Support Organizational Transformation: Empirical Findings from a State-Owned Enterprise," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 93-102, January.
    19. Darmani, Anna, 2015. "Renewable energy investors in Sweden: A cross-subsector analysis of dynamic capabilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 46-57.
    20. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1928-:d:116275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.