IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i4p390-d68620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Esma Gül Emecen Kara

    (Maritime Transport Management Engineering, Engineering Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul 34320, Turkey)

Abstract

The Istanbul Strait has intense maritime traffic while, at the same time, it poses significant navigational challenges. Due to these properties, there is always a high risk arising from maritime shipping in this region. Especially, substandard ships threaten life, as well as the marine environment. In this aspect, Black Sea Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Port State Control Inspections are important for maritime safety in the Istanbul Strait, because they directly reflect the performance of ships passing through the Istanbul Strait. Stringent and effective inspections assist in the enhancement of navigation safety and help to develop sustainable environment management. In this context, this study aims to assess maritime safety for the Strait region concerning passing flag states. Firstly, to assess the performance of flag states in general, the Black Sea MOU Black-Grey-White lists were generated for the period 2004–2014 and the change in the performance of these flags was examined. Secondly, the risk level of each flag state passing from the Strait region was determined using the method of weighted points based on the Black-Grey-White List, deficiency index level, casualty index level, and passing index level.

Suggested Citation

  • Esma Gül Emecen Kara, 2016. "Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:390-:d:68620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, K. X., 1999. "The safety and quality of open registers and a new approach for classifying risky ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 135-143, June.
    2. Knapp, Sabine & Franses, Philip Hans, 2007. "Econometric analysis on the effect of port state control inspections on the probability of casualty: Can targeting of substandard ships for inspections be improved?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 550-563, July.
    3. Payoyo, Peter Bautista, 1994. "Implementation of international conventions through port state control: an assessment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 379-392, September.
    4. Kevin X. Li & Haisha Zheng, 2008. "Enforcement of law by the Port State Control (PSC)," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 61-71, February.
    5. Knapp, S. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2007. "Comprehensive review of the maritime safety regimes," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. K. X. Li & J. Wonham, 1999. "Who is safe and who is at risk: a study of 20-year-record on accident total loss in different flags," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 137-144, April.
    7. Cariou, Pierre & Mejia Jr., Maximo Q. & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2008. "On the effectiveness of port state control inspections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 491-503, May.
    8. Sabine Knapp & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "A global view on port state control: econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 453-482, October.
    9. Knapp, Sabine & Franses, Philip Hans, 2008. "Econometric analysis to differentiate effects of various ship safety inspections," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 653-662, July.
    10. J. M. Silos & F. Piniella & J. Monedero & J. Walliser, 2013. "The role of the Classification Societies in the era of globalization: a case study," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 384-400, July.
    11. Pierre Cariou & Maximo Q. Mejia & Francois-Charles Wolff, 2007. "An econometric analysis of deficiencies noted in port state control inspections," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 243-258, June.
    12. Ozcan Arslan & Osman Turan, 2009. "Analytical investigation of marine casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT--AHP method," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 131-145, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Development of a non-parametric classifier: Effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 129-157.
    2. Fan, Lixian & Luo, Meifeng & Yin, Jinbo, 2014. "Flag choice and Port State Control inspections—Empirical evidence using a simultaneous model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 350-357.
    3. Xiao, Yi & Qi, Guanqiu & Jin, Mengjie & Yuen, Kum Fai & Chen, Zhuo & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-172.
    4. Graziano, Armando & Mejia, Maximo Q. & Schröder-Hinrichs, Jens-Uwe, 2018. "Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-108.
    5. Heij, C. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Knapp, S., 2010. "Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-33, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Wang, Yuhong & Zhang, Fan & Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili, 2021. "Incorporation of deficiency data into the analysis of the dependency and interdependency among the risk factors influencing port state control inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    8. Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2015. "Identifying substandard vessels through Port State Control inspections: A new methodology for Concentrated Inspection Campaigns," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-39.
    9. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    10. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Teixeira, Angelo Palos, 2020. "Comparative analysis of the impact of new inspection regime on port state control inspection," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 65-80.
    11. Knapp, S. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Heij, C., 2010. "Estimated Incident Cost Savings in Shipping Due to Inspections," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-28, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    12. Xiao, Yi & Wang, Grace & Ge, Ying-En & Xu, Qinyi & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Game model for a new inspection regime of port state control under different reward and punishment conditions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Armando Graziano & Pierre Cariou & François-Charles Wolff & Maximo Mejia & Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs, 2017. "Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector's number and background matter?," Working Papers halshs-01649418, HAL.
    14. Yan, Ran & Mo, Haoyu & Guo, Xiaomeng & Yang, Ying & Wang, Shuaian, 2022. "Is port state control influenced by the COVID-19? Evidence from inspection data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 82-103.
    15. François Fulconis & Raphael Lissillour, 2021. "Toward a behavioral approach of international shipping: a study of the inter-organisational dynamics of maritime safety," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2020. "A semi-“smart predict then optimize” (semi-SPO) method for efficient ship inspection," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-125.
    17. Jose Manuel Prieto & Victor Amor & Ignacio Turias & David Almorza & Francisco Piniella, 2021. "Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Jose Manuel Prieto & Víctor Amor-Esteban & David Almorza-Gomar & Ignacio Turias & Francisco Piniella, 2023. "Application of Multivariate Statistical Techniques as an Indicator of Variability of the Effects of COVID-19 on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Jelena Nikcevic, 2018. "Montenegro on the Path to Paris MoU Accession: Towards Achieving a Sustainable Shipping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Antão, P. & Sun, S. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2023. "Quantitative assessment of ship collision risk influencing factors from worldwide accident and fleet data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:390-:d:68620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.