IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-01649418.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector's number and background matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Armando Graziano

    (World Maritime University - Malmö Högskola = Malmö University)

  • Pierre Cariou

    (Kedge Business School [Talence])

  • François-Charles Wolff

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Maximo Mejia

    (World Maritime University - Malmö Högskola = Malmö University)

  • Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs

    (World Maritime University - World Maritime University)

Abstract

The succession of maritime accidents in the last decades of the 20th Century caused a strong political and public outcry for more stringent maritime safety regulations and measures. One of the most significant developments in this regard was the establishment of several regional agreements on Port State Control (PSC) with the specific objective of fighting substandard shipping through coordinated and harmonised inspection procedures. This article is based on results from 32,206 PSC inspections carried out by the European Union and European Free Trade Association Member States within the Paris MoU region from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015 to assess whether discrepancies among Member States exist after the entry into force of Directive 2009/16/EC and the introduction of the New Inspection Regime. Further, the study proceeds by investigating whether PSC team composition and inspector's background influence inspection outcomes. The study has identified that differences in detecting at least one deficiency and/or detaining a vessel are significant among Member States. With regard to team composition and background, it appears that the former correlates to the number of deficiencies and detentions and the latter, though the significance is not always consistent, to detecting a certain type of deficiencies according to the specific inspector's backgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Armando Graziano & Pierre Cariou & François-Charles Wolff & Maximo Mejia & Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs, 2017. "Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector's number and background matter?," Working Papers halshs-01649418, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01649418
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.031
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01649418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01649418/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Cariou & François-Charles Wolff, 2011. "Do Port State Control Inspections Influence Flag- and Class-hopping Phenomena in Shipping?," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 45(2), pages 155-177, May.
    2. Payoyo, Peter Bautista, 1994. "Implementation of international conventions through port state control: an assessment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 379-392, September.
    3. Kevin X. Li & Haisha Zheng, 2008. "Enforcement of law by the Port State Control (PSC)," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 61-71, February.
    4. Pierre Cariou & Maximo Q. Mejia & Francois-Charles Wolff, 2007. "An econometric analysis of deficiencies noted in port state control inspections," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 243-258, June.
    5. Cariou, Pierre & Mejia, Maximo Q. & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2009. "Evidence on target factors used for port state control inspections," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 847-859, September.
    6. Sabine Knapp & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "A global view on port state control: econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 453-482, October.
    7. Bell, Douglas, 1993. "Port state control v flag state control: UK government position," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 367-370, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graziano, Armando & Mejia, Maximo Q. & Schröder-Hinrichs, Jens-Uwe, 2018. "Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-108.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graziano, Armando & Mejia, Maximo Q. & Schröder-Hinrichs, Jens-Uwe, 2018. "Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-108.
    2. Xiao, Yi & Qi, Guanqiu & Jin, Mengjie & Yuen, Kum Fai & Chen, Zhuo & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-172.
    3. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Development of a non-parametric classifier: Effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 129-157.
    4. Wang, Yuhong & Zhang, Fan & Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili, 2021. "Incorporation of deficiency data into the analysis of the dependency and interdependency among the risk factors influencing port state control inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2015. "Identifying substandard vessels through Port State Control inspections: A new methodology for Concentrated Inspection Campaigns," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-39.
    6. Fan, Lixian & Luo, Meifeng & Yin, Jinbo, 2014. "Flag choice and Port State Control inspections—Empirical evidence using a simultaneous model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 350-357.
    7. Esma Gül Emecen Kara, 2016. "Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    9. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Teixeira, Angelo Palos, 2020. "Comparative analysis of the impact of new inspection regime on port state control inspection," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 65-80.
    10. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2020. "A semi-“smart predict then optimize” (semi-SPO) method for efficient ship inspection," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-125.
    11. Yan, Ran & Mo, Haoyu & Guo, Xiaomeng & Yang, Ying & Wang, Shuaian, 2022. "Is port state control influenced by the COVID-19? Evidence from inspection data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 82-103.
    12. Zhu, Jiang-Hong & Yang, Qiang & Jiang, Jun, 2023. "Identifying crucial deficiency categories influencing ship detention: A method of combining cloud model and prospect theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    14. Nwokedi Theophilus C. & Eko-Rapheals Melvin Urhoromu & Obasi Catherine & Okechkwu Anyanwu Julius, 2022. "Performance of Abuja MOU on Port State Control in Enforcement of IMO Regulations on Maritime Safety," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 233-244, January.
    15. Jose Manuel Prieto & Victor Amor & Ignacio Turias & David Almorza & Francisco Piniella, 2021. "Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Helena Ukić Boljat & Merica Slišković & Igor Jelaska & Anita Gudelj & Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, 2020. "Analysis of Pollution Related Deficiencies Identified through PSC Inspections for the Period 2014–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Knapp, S. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Heij, C., 2010. "Estimated Incident Cost Savings in Shipping Due to Inspections," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-28, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Jose Manuel Prieto & Víctor Amor-Esteban & David Almorza-Gomar & Ignacio Turias & Francisco Piniella, 2023. "Application of Multivariate Statistical Techniques as an Indicator of Variability of the Effects of COVID-19 on the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Xiao, Yi & Wang, Grace & Ge, Ying-En & Xu, Qinyi & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Game model for a new inspection regime of port state control under different reward and punishment conditions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Heij, C. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Knapp, S., 2010. "Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-33, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Port state control; inspection outcome;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01649418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.