IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/19920.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Heij, C.
  • Bijwaard, G.E.
  • Knapp, S.

Abstract

Global trade depends for a large part on maritime transport, and safe ships are needed not only to protect precious cargo but also to prevent environmental damage. Flag state and port state authorities spend much effort in ship safety inspections to ensure a minimum safety level and to prevent casualties. This paper investigates the safety gains of current inspection rules as well as options for further improvement. The analysis is based on a dataset of over four hundred thousand ship arrivals originating from some important trading nations between 2002 and 2007, complemented with data on port state control and industry inspections and casualties. The results indicate considerable potential safety gains of incorporating estimated future casualty risks more explicitly in port state control strategies to select ships for safety inspection.

Suggested Citation

  • Heij, C. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Knapp, S., 2010. "Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-33, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:19920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/19920/EI2010-33.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knapp, Sabine & Franses, Philip Hans, 2009. "Does ratification matter and do major conventions improve safety and decrease pollution in shipping?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 826-846, September.
    2. Payoyo, Peter Bautista, 1994. "Implementation of international conventions through port state control: an assessment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 379-392, September.
    3. Van den Berg, Gerard J., 2001. "Duration models: specification, identification and multiple durations," Handbook of Econometrics, in: J.J. Heckman & E.E. Leamer (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 55, pages 3381-3460, Elsevier.
    4. Knapp, Sabine & Franses, Philip Hans, 2008. "Econometric analysis to differentiate effects of various ship safety inspections," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 653-662, July.
    5. Sabine Knapp & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "A global view on port state control: econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 453-482, October.
    6. Bijwaard, Govert E. & Knapp, Sabine, 2009. "Analysis of ship life cycles--The impact of economic cycles and ship inspections," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 350-369, March.
    7. Knapp, Sabine & Franses, Philip Hans, 2007. "Econometric analysis on the effect of port state control inspections on the probability of casualty: Can targeting of substandard ships for inspections be improved?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 550-563, July.
    8. Knapp, S. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Heij, C., 2010. "Estimated Incident Cost Savings in Shipping Due to Inspections," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-28, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Cariou, Pierre & Mejia Jr., Maximo Q. & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2008. "On the effectiveness of port state control inspections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 491-503, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heij, C. & Knapp, S., 2011. "Risk evaluation methods at individual ship and company level," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2011-23, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knapp, S. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Heij, C., 2010. "Estimated Incident Cost Savings in Shipping Due to Inspections," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-28, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Heij, C. & Knapp, S., 2011. "Risk evaluation methods at individual ship and company level," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2011-23, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. Esma Gül Emecen Kara, 2016. "Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Graziano, Armando & Mejia, Maximo Q. & Schröder-Hinrichs, Jens-Uwe, 2018. "Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-108.
    5. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Teixeira, Angelo Palos, 2020. "Comparative analysis of the impact of new inspection regime on port state control inspection," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 65-80.
    6. Fan, Lixian & Luo, Meifeng & Yin, Jinbo, 2014. "Flag choice and Port State Control inspections—Empirical evidence using a simultaneous model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 350-357.
    7. Xiao, Yi & Qi, Guanqiu & Jin, Mengjie & Yuen, Kum Fai & Chen, Zhuo & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-172.
    8. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    9. Knapp, S. & van de Velden, M., 2010. "Visualization of Ship Risk Profiles for the Shipping Industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-013-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Xiao, Yi & Wang, Grace & Ge, Ying-En & Xu, Qinyi & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Game model for a new inspection regime of port state control under different reward and punishment conditions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2015. "Identifying substandard vessels through Port State Control inspections: A new methodology for Concentrated Inspection Campaigns," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-39.
    12. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Development of a non-parametric classifier: Effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 129-157.
    13. Jose Manuel Prieto & Victor Amor & Ignacio Turias & David Almorza & Francisco Piniella, 2021. "Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Wang, Yuhong & Zhang, Fan & Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili, 2021. "Incorporation of deficiency data into the analysis of the dependency and interdependency among the risk factors influencing port state control inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. François Fulconis & Raphael Lissillour, 2021. "Toward a behavioral approach of international shipping: a study of the inter-organisational dynamics of maritime safety," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    17. Armando Graziano & Pierre Cariou & François-Charles Wolff & Maximo Mejia & Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs, 2017. "Port state control inspections in the European Union: Do inspector's number and background matter?," Working Papers halshs-01649418, HAL.
    18. Ji, Xichen & Brinkhuis, Jan & Knapp, Sabine, 2015. "A method to measure enforcement effort in shipping with incomplete information," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 162-170.
    19. Ji, X. & Brinkhuis, J. & Knapp, S., 2014. "A method to measure enforcement effort in shipping with incomplete information," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2014-12, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    20. Heij, C. & Knapp, S., 2018. "Predictive power of inspection outcomes for future shipping accidents," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-09, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    hazard rate; inspection strategy; maritime safety; port state control; risk factor;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:19920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.