IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v36y2009i2p131-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical investigation of marine casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT--AHP method

Author

Listed:
  • Ozcan Arslan
  • Osman Turan

Abstract

The Strait of Istanbul is one of the most dangerous and busiest sea passages, according to its narrowness, sharp turns, currents, heavy traffic and many other important factors. Despite the latest precautions, marine incidents still occur, especially in narrow seaways. This study shows that a management tool that is specifically applied for reducing marine casualties and consequently enhancement of safety and ship management performance can be used to prevent accidents and casualties in maritime transportation. In this study, factors which affect marine casualties examined and determined with SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis method and weighting of the factors determined by using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. With this approach, strategic action plans were developed for minimizing shipping casualties at the Strait of Istanbul, taking into account the weighting factors and previously happened accidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozcan Arslan & Osman Turan, 2009. "Analytical investigation of marine casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT--AHP method," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 131-145, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:131-145
    DOI: 10.1080/03088830902868081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088830902868081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088830902868081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter J. Stavroulakis & Stratos Papadimitriou, 2017. "Situation analysis forecasting: the case of European maritime clusters," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 779-789, August.
    2. Ting Fan & Dong Qian Xue, 2018. "Sustainable Development of Cultural Industry in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China: A SWOT and AHP Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Li, Huanhuan & Ren, Xujie & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Data-driven Bayesian network for risk analysis of global maritime accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Çakır, Erkan & Fışkın, Remzi & Sevgili, Coşkan, 2021. "Investigation of tugboat accidents severity: An application of association rule mining algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Gino J. Lim & Jaeyoung Cho & Selim Bora & Taofeek Biobaku & Hamid Parsaei, 2018. "Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 765-786, December.
    6. Yanfeng Wang & Zaifang Jing & Jie Lyu, 2022. "Study on Sustainable Development Strategy of Rural E-Commerce in the Northeast of China—A Case Study of 11 Villages, 11 Towns and 4 Counties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Kaptan, Mehmet & Uğurlu, Özkan & Wang, Jin, 2021. "The effect of nonconformities encountered in the use of technology on the occurrence of collision, contact and grounding accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Esma Gül Emecen Kara, 2016. "Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:131-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.