IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7191-d1461035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China

Author

Listed:
  • Huiying Zhang

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Zijian Zhu

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Political Science and Public Administration, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China)

Abstract

The level of mobile government services has become a crucial metric for modernizing a government’s governance capabilities, and it plays a significant role in promoting sustainable development. This study aims to explore the key factors influencing the level of mobile government services across 31 provinces in China, along with their combinatory pathways. Using the technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework and employing fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this study conducts an in-depth analysis of mobile government service levels across these provinces, focusing on the dimensions of technology, organization, and environment. The results identify three pathways that promote high levels of mobile government services: technology–organization, technology–environment, and internal–external linkage-driven pathways. These pathways offer viable strategies for achieving sustainable development in mobile government services. Additionally, this study identifies two pathways associated with lower service levels, technology deficiency, and organization–environment misalignment, highlighting key factors that hinder sustainable development. The findings suggest that organizational and environmental factors can complement each other based on technological conditions, internet penetration rates, and citizen participation levels. Based on these insights, this study recommends that provincial governments proactively explore sustainable development pathways, optimize the “technology–organization–environment” conditions to harness synergies, and work towards enhancing mobile government service levels, thereby reducing inter-provincial disparities and advancing sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiying Zhang & Zijian Zhu, 2024. "Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7191-:d:1461035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aurélien Buffat, 2015. "Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 149-161, January.
    2. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Pérez-Macías, Noemí & Fernández-Fernádez, José Luis, 2023. "The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Birney, Mayling, 2014. "Decentralization and Veiled Corruption under China’s “Rule of Mandates”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 55-67.
    4. Daqing Zheng & Jin Chen & Lihua Huang & Cheng Zhang, 2013. "E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 221-234, March.
    5. Malodia, Suresh & Dhir, Amandeep & Mishra, Mahima & Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed, 2021. "Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    7. Liang Ma, 2014. "Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 274-295, February.
    8. Emre Cinar & Paul Trott & Christopher Simms, 2019. "A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 264-290, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wynen, Jan & Boon, Jan & Kleizen, Bjorn & Verhoest, Koen, 2020. "How multiple organizational changes shape managerial support for innovative work behavior : Evidence from the Australian Public Service," Other publications TiSEM 4f721d76-0c44-4d72-a494-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Equey, Catherine & Priftis, Athanasios & Trabichet, Jean-Philippe & Hutzli, Vanissla, 2024. "Designing a digital citizen-centered service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Garín-Muñoz, Teresa & López, Rafael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Herguera, Iñigo & Valarezo, Angel, 2019. "Models for individual adoption of eCommerce, eBanking and eGovernment in Spain," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 100-111.
    4. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Kumju Hwang & Hyemi Um, 2021. "Social Controls and Bonds of Public Information Consumer on Sustainable Utilization and Provision for Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Kostas Zafiropoulos & Ioannis Karavasilis & Vasiliki Vrana, 2012. "Assessing the Adoption of e-Government Services by Teachers in Greece," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    8. van der Kamp, Denise & Lorentzen, Peter & Mattingly, Daniel, 2017. "Racing to the Bottom or to the Top? Decentralization, Revenue Pressures, and Governance Reform in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 164-176.
    9. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    10. repec:ddj:parsro:y:2013:i:2:p:53-61 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Cricelli, Livio & Mauriello, Roberto & Strazzullo, Serena, 2023. "Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Ge Xin & Jia Chen, 2023. "Decentralized governance and collective action dilemma: Sub‐national governments' responses to COVID‐19 in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 163-175, May.
    14. Suárez Serrato, Juan Carlos & Wang, Xiao Yu & Zhang, Shuang, 2019. "The limits of meritocracy: Screening bureaucrats under imperfect verifiability," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 223-241.
    15. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    17. Ali Hammad & Intikhab Ahmad & Syed Muhammad Sikander & Md Amjad Hossain Reyad & Syed Mazahir Kazmi, 2019. "Ascendants That Influence the Adoption of E-government Services among Citizen of Pakistan," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 72-91, June.
    18. Ji, Mianmian & Lv, Wendai, 2022. "Demonstration zones reform and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    19. Bernice Beukes & Marina Kirstein & Rolien Kunz & Lynette Nagel, 2018. "Innovators to laggards – how South African students adopted and perceived technologically enhanced learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 513-530, September.
    20. Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle & Benjamin Leruth, 2022. "Differentiation in the European Union in Post‐Brexit and ‐Pandemic Times: Macro‐Level Developments with Meso‐Level Consequences," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 26-37, September.
    21. Stephen Jackson & Meng Seng Wong, 0. "A cultural theory analysis of e-government: Insights from a local government council in Malaysia," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7191-:d:1461035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.