IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v9y2019i2p72-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ascendants That Influence the Adoption of E-government Services among Citizen of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Hammad
  • Intikhab Ahmad
  • Syed Muhammad Sikander
  • Md Amjad Hossain Reyad
  • Syed Mazahir Kazmi

Abstract

In this research study, the author seeks to discover the predecessors of e-government services adoption among the citizen of Pakistan. To study the e-government adoption, researcher integrates extended TAM and theory of planned behaviour. Cross-sectional research technique was used and in total data was collected from 240 citizens of Pakistan. Results depict that facilitating conditions, performance expectancy, effort expectancy positively impact the citizen attitude towards adoption of e-government facilities. As well as, facilitating conditions as a positive impact on society and individual computer self-efficacy which helps in building citizen attitude. Furthermore, the researcher studies the impact of government trust as a moderator to test the relationship between attitude and adoption of e-government services. Results show that government trust dampens down the relationship between attitude and e-government adoption. To the conclude results SEM technique was used using AMOS-21.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Hammad & Intikhab Ahmad & Syed Muhammad Sikander & Md Amjad Hossain Reyad & Syed Mazahir Kazmi, 2019. "Ascendants That Influence the Adoption of E-government Services among Citizen of Pakistan," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 72-91, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:72-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/14756/11642
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/14756
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. M.P. Swann, 2009. "The Economics of Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13211.
    2. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    3. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    4. Elster, Jon, 1989. "Social Norms and Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 99-117, Fall.
    5. Michihiro Kandori, 1992. "Social Norms and Community Enforcement," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 59(1), pages 63-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonuç Zorali & Kamil Kanipek, 2023. "An Empirical Research on the Determination of Effective Factors in E-Government Acceptance and Use: Northern Cyprus Case," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Guohua Zeng & Chuanyong Luo, 2020. "E-Government Services Adoption: An Extension of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8651 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Michael C Burda & Daniel S Hamermesh & Philippe Weil, 2006. "Different but Equal: Total Work, Gender and Social Norms in the EU and US Time Use," Post-Print hal-01053588, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8651 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hensel, Lukas & Witte, Marc & Caria, A. Stefano & Fetzer, Thiemo & Fiorin, Stefano & Götz, Friedrich M. & Gomez, Margarita & Haushofer, Johannes & Ivchenko, Andriy & Kraft-Todd, Gordon & Reutskaja, El, 2022. "Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 473-496.
    5. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8642 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tolciu, Andreia, 2008. "Is unemployment a consequence of social interactions? Seeking for a common research framework for economists and other social scientists," HWWI Research Papers 1-15, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    7. Elvin Afandi & Majid Kermani & Fuad Mammadov, 2017. "Social capital and entrepreneurial process," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 685-716, September.
    8. Paolo Buonanno & Giacomo Pasini & Paolo Vanin, 2012. "Crime and social sanction," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(1), pages 193-218, March.
    9. Salman Zulfiqar & Fahad Asmi & Khurram Ejaz Chandia & Binesh Sarwar & Saira Aziz, 2017. "Measuring Entrepreneurial Readiness among Youth in Pakistan through Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) Based Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 149-167, June.
    10. Alois Stutzer & Rafael Lalive, 2004. "The Role of Social Work Norms in Job Searching and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 2(4), pages 696-719, June.
    11. Dirk Helbing & Anders Johansson, 2010. "Cooperation, Norms, and Revolutions: A Unified Game-Theoretical Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Golman, Russell, 2023. "Acceptable discourse: Social norms of beliefs and opinions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. David Masclet, 2003. "L'analyse de l'influence de la pression des pairs dans les équipes de travail," CIRANO Working Papers 2003s-35, CIRANO.
    14. Michael C Burda & Daniel S Hamermesh & Philippe Weil, 2008. "Total Work, Gender and Social Norms in EU and US Time Use," Post-Print hal-00972821, HAL.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8642 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Daugaard, Dan & Kent, Danielle & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2023. "Optimistic framing increases responsible investment of investment professionals," MPRA Paper 119677, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Syed Mazahir kazmi & Ali Hammad & Arslan Ahmed & Salman zulfiqar, 2019. "Impact of Internal Cognitive Factors on Social Entrepreneurial Intention," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 106-122, March.
    18. G. Ceccantoni & O. Tarola & C. Vergari, 2017. "Relative tax in a vertically differentiated market: the key role of consumers in environment," Working Papers wp2005, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    19. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8650 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Michael C Burda & Daniel S Hamermesh & Philippe Weil, 2007. "Total Work, Gender and Social Norms," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972817, HAL.
    21. Andreas Reinstaller, 2013. "An Evolutionary View on Social Innovation and the Process of Economic Change. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 43," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47018, April.
    22. Corneo, Giacomo & Jeanne, Olivier, 1997. "Snobs, bandwagons, and the origin of social customs in consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 333-347, March.
    23. Zheng, Chen & Cheung, Adrian Wai Kong & Cronje, Tom, 2022. "Social capital and bank liquidity hoarding," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    24. Igor Dubina & Elias Carayannis & David Campbell, 2012. "Creativity Economy and a Crisis of the Economy? Coevolution of Knowledge, Innovation, and Creativity, and of the Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Society," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, March.
    25. H Peyton Young, 2014. "The Evolution of Social Norms," Economics Series Working Papers 726, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance expectancy; Effort expectancy; Facilitating condition; Trust in government;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:72-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.