IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7168-d1460676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Consumption of Animal-Based Dairy and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Tulysewski

    (Centre for Global Food and Resources, The University of Adelaide, Level 6 Nexus 10 Tower, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
    Human Health Program, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Gilly A. Hendrie

    (Human Health Program, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Danielle L. Baird

    (Human Health Program, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Wendy Umberger

    (School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Lenka Malek

    (School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia)

Abstract

In the transition to more environmentally sustainable food systems, the production and consumption of resource-intensive animal-based dairy foods (ABD) remains a talking point. Given the power of consumer choice in transforming food systems, understanding consumer priorities surrounding ABD consumption and their plant-based counterparts is fundamental. Using data from 3271 unique survey respondents, the objectives of this study were to examine the consumption frequencies of ABD and plant-based milk (PBM) in Australia over time (2019–2022) and determine the psychosocial and sociodemographic factors associated with distinct consumer segments. Multivariate analysis identified sociodemographic and food choice factors associated with three consumer segments: ‘exclusive PBM consumers’, ‘exclusive ABD consumers’, and ‘mixed consumers’ (consumers of both product types). Despite the growing availability of plant-based milk alternatives, exclusive PBM consumption remains relatively uncommon compared to mixed plant and animal dairy consumption. ‘Exclusive ABD consumers’ had a higher probability of being older and less likely to prioritise health and nutrition than ‘mixed consumers’. ‘Exclusive PBM consumers’ were more likely to prioritise food tolerance and restrictions and less likely to prioritise product taste than ‘exclusive ABD consumers’. We report sociodemographic and motivational factors influencing animal-based dairy and plant-based milk choices. The outcomes are of interest to sustainable food systems development stakeholders, with potential applications in the public health and commercial food promotion sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Tulysewski & Gilly A. Hendrie & Danielle L. Baird & Wendy Umberger & Lenka Malek, 2024. "Factors Influencing Consumption of Animal-Based Dairy and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7168-:d:1460676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelder, S.H. & Perry, C.L. & Klepp, K.-I. & Lytle, L.L., 1994. "Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(7), pages 1121-1126.
    2. Stewart, Hayden & Dong, Diansheng, 2023. "U.S. Household Purchases of Dairy Milk and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    3. Lai, Yufeng & Boaitey, Albert & Minegishi, Kota, 2022. "Behind the veil: Social desirability bias and animal welfare ballot initiatives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debra A. Hoffmann & Jenna M. Marx & Jacob M. Burmeister & Dara R. Musher-Eizenman, 2018. "Friday Night Is Pizza Night: A Comparison of Children’s Dietary Intake and Maternal Perceptions and Feeding Goals on Weekdays and Weekends," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Belot, Michèle & James, Jonathan & Nolen, Patrick, 2016. "Incentives and children's dietary choices: A field experiment in primary schools," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 213-229.
    3. Mancino, Lisa & Todd, Jessica E. & Guthrie, Joanne F. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2010. "How Food Away From Home Affects Children's Diet Quality," Economic Research Report 134700, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Daniela Weible, 2013. "Gender-Driven Food Choice: Explaining School Milk Consumption of Boys and Girls," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 403-423, December.
    5. World Bank, 2020. "Assessing Public Financing for Nutrition in Sri Lanka (2014–2018)," World Bank Publications - Reports 33419, The World Bank Group.
    6. Asirvatham, Jebaraj & Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr. & Thomsen, Michael R., 2013. "Peer-Effects on Childhood Obesity," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150417, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Weible, Daniela & Salamon, Petra, 2018. "Youths’ Preferences for Milk Products at School: How Product Attributes and Perceived Body Image Affect Choices," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(2), March.
    8. Lauren Lautenschlager & Chery Smith, 2007. "Beliefs, knowledge, and values held by inner-city youth about gardening, nutrition, and cooking," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(2), pages 245-258, June.
    9. Dondero, Molly & Van Hook, Jennifer, 2016. "Generational status, neighborhood context, and mother-child resemblance in dietary quality in Mexican-origin families," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 212-220.
    10. Nie, Peng & Sousa-Poza, Alfonso & He, Xiaobo, 2015. "Peer effects on childhood and adolescent obesity in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 47-69.
    11. Papoutsi, Georgia S. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Lazaridis, Panagiotis & Drichoutis, Andreas C., 2015. "Fat tax, subsidy or both? The role of information and children's pester power in food choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 196-208.
    12. Cayley E. Velazquez & Jennifer L. Black & Monique Potvin Kent, 2017. "Food and Beverage Marketing in Schools: A Review of the Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Papoutsi, Georgia & Nayga, Rodolfo & Lazaridis, Panagiotis & Drichoutis, Andreas, 2013. "Nudging parental health behavior with and without children's pestering power: Fat tax, subsidy or both?," MPRA Paper 52324, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Livingstone, Sonia & Helsper, Ellen, 2004. "Advertising foods to children: Understanding promotion in the context of children's daily lives. A review of the literature prepared for the Research Department of the Office of Communications (OFCOM)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 21757, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Buttenheim, Alison & Goldman, Noreen & Pebley, Anne R. & Wong, Rebeca & Chung, Chang, 2010. "Do Mexican immigrants "import" social gradients in health to the US?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1268-1276, October.
    16. Yichong Li & Mei Zhang & Yong Jiang & Fan Wu, 2012. "Co-variations and Clustering of Chronic Disease Behavioral Risk Factors in China: China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance, 2007," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
    17. repec:esx:essedp:753 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:arp:sjmhsm:2021:p:55-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Weible, Daniela & Salamon, Petra, 2016. "Preferences for School Milk - How Juveniles Differ," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244518, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    20. Pepijn Schreinemachers & Bal Bdr Rai & Desang Dorji & Hsiao-pu Chen & Thinley Dukpa & Namgay Thinley & Passang Lhamo Sherpa & Ray-Yu Yang, 2017. "School gardening in Bhutan: Evaluating outcomes and impact," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 635-648, June.
    21. Maschkowski, Gesa & Hartmann, Monika & Grebitus, Carola, 2010. "Analyzing Parental Influence on Fruit and Vegetable Consumption," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116413, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    22. Blemings, Benjamin & Zhang, Peilu & Neill, Clinton L., 2023. "Where is the value? The impacts of sow gestation crate laws on pork supply and consumer value perceptions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7168-:d:1460676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.