IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6829-d1453046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognising Ecological Reflexivity: An Alternative Approach to Partnership Capabilities for Collaborative Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Stanberry

    (Initiative for Leadership and Sustainability, Institute for Business, Industry, and Leadership, University of Cumbria, Ambleside LA22 9BB, UK)

  • David F. Murphy

    (Initiative for Leadership and Sustainability, Institute for Business, Industry, and Leadership, University of Cumbria, Ambleside LA22 9BB, UK)

  • Janis Bragan Balda

    (Robert C. Vackar College of Business and Entrepreneurship, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA)

Abstract

Ecological reflexivity provides a key lever for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) but is underexplored in one prominent context: collaborative governance particularly associated with SDG 17. Using an exploratory study and novel approach to Q methodology, we investigate capabilities needed for advancing collaborative governance and cross-sector partnering through an exploratory study. Rather than treating these capacities as universal standards or aims for collaboration between varied stakeholders, they were offered as options that actors may value and choose to advance (or not). Local sustainability-focused actors in North West England sorted capabilities as statements, which discursively reframe multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) building blocks. The first analysis reveals three viewpoints that we name: The Convener, The Connector, and The Chair. The themes of communicative coordination, reflexivity, and power emerged in the three viewpoints, expressing distinct discourses. A separate, second analysis explores a viewpoint encompassing capabilities needed for ecological reflexivity. Our findings demonstrate possible barriers to some approaches valued in the MSP literature such as systems thinking. Finally, in our action research setting, it is possible that the methodology itself facilitated ecological reflexivity and offered entry points to enable agency in the context of SDG 17 and collaboration of diverse actors towards SDG implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Stanberry & David F. Murphy & Janis Bragan Balda, 2024. "Recognising Ecological Reflexivity: An Alternative Approach to Partnership Capabilities for Collaborative Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6829-:d:1453046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carole‐Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann, 2021. "In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 581-591, November.
    2. Steven Brown, 2006. "A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 361-382, June.
    3. John Holden & Marianne Sensier & Richard Allmendinger, 2021. "The North West of England's Productivity Challenge: Exploring the issues," Insight Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.
    4. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02312197, HAL.
    5. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    6. Leda Stott & David F. Murphy, 2020. "An Inclusive Approach to Partnerships for the SDGs: Using a Relationship Lens to Explore the Potential for Transformational Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Pratima Bansal & Wendy Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02276705, HAL.
    8. Dryzek, John S. & Clark, Margaret L. & McKenzie, Garry, 1989. "Subject and system in international interaction," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 475-503, July.
    9. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Brenton & Natalie Slawinski, 2023. "Collaborating for Community Regeneration: Facilitating Partnerships in, Through, and for Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 815-834, May.
    2. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    5. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    6. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Manyise, Timothy & Dentoni, Domenico, 2021. "Value chain partnerships and farmer entrepreneurship as balancing ecosystem services: Implications for agri-food systems resilience," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    8. Schlepphorst, Susanne & Welter, Friederike & Holz, Michael, 2022. "Die gesellschaftliche Wertschöpfung des Mittelstands," IfM-Materialien 292, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    9. Turienzo, Javier & Cabanelas, Pablo & Lampón, Jesús F., 2023. "Business models in times of disruption: The connected and autonomous vehicles (uncertain) domino effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Ming-Jer Chen, 2018. "Scholarship-practice “oneness” of an academic career: The entrepreneurial pursuit of an expansive view of management scholarship," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 859-886, December.
    11. José Satsumi López-Morales & Héctor Francisco Salazar-Núñez & Claudia Guadalupe Zarrabal-Gutiérrez, 2022. "The impact of qualitative methods on article citation: an international business research perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3225-3236, June.
    12. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    13. Wu, Juan & Wang, Daojuan & Morschett, Dirk, 2023. "Light Touch Goes Where? A Longitudinal Study of the Post-Acquisition Integration Paths Adopted by Chinese Multinational Enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    14. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen, 2019. "Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 978-990.
    15. Rebecca Hewett, 2023. "Dissonance, Reflection and Reframing: Unpacking the Black Box of Motivation Internalization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 285-312, March.
    16. Amanda Williams & Lara Anne Blasberg, 2022. "SDG Platforms as Strategic Innovation Through Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1041-1057, November.
    17. Päivi Luoma & Romana Rauter & Esko Penttinen & Anne Toppinen, 2023. "The value of data for environmental sustainability as perceived by the customers of a tissue‐paper supplier," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3110-3123, November.
    18. María-Ángeles Rastrollo-Horrillo & Julia Martín-Armario, 2019. "Organisational barriers to nascent born-global growth: Learning from the inside," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 454-473, September.
    19. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "Misfit? The Use of Metrics in Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Elco Van Burg & Joep Cornelissen & Wouter Stam & Sarah Jack, 2022. "Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6829-:d:1453046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.