IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i7p332-d596305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Ilse Svensson de Jong

    (Innovation Engineering, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

To date, measuring innovation has not been an exact science. As in many areas of organizational life, errors in measuring innovation are a recurring fact. Innovation researchers and practitioners alike have become increasingly interested in understanding the occurrence of organizational errors and how these errors affect innovation and its measurement. This empirical study aims to address this under-explored area by utilizing a qualitative in-depth case study at the innovation department of an organization with production sites and sales organizations worldwide. A total of 28 semi-structured interviews at several organizational levels were conducted, with innovation managers, project managers, senior managers, and staff. Based on the findings in this case study, three explanations are presented on how organizational errors occur when using innovation KPIs (key performance indicators). The first explanation can be connected to the increasing complexity of innovation and its intangible nature. Another explanation can be traced to the difference between innovation strategy and innovation KPIs. Lastly, room for organizational errors can be related to the multitude of individuals and organizational levels involved in innovation and its measurement. The implications for practitioners are that innovation KPIs are not precise metrics but should be seen as estimates with organizational errors. Whether or not these innovation KPIs can be used as tools to turn innovation into competitive advantages largely depends on whether wrong is right. Future research should focus on the metrics that are implemented and actually in use, as this future path would highlight the function and dysfunction that organizational errors in innovation KPIs can have.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:332-:d:596305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    2. Yitagesu Yilma Goshu & Daniel Kitaw, 2017. "Performance measurement and its recent challenge: a literature review," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 381-402.
    3. Elias G. Carayannis & McDonald R. Stewart, 2014. "Theory and Literature," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Entrepreneurial Profiles of Creative Destruction, chapter 2, pages 29-130, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(01), March.
    5. Antonio Davila & George Foster & Daniel Oyon, 2009. "Accounting and Control, Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Venturing into New Research Opportunities," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 281-311.
    6. Jørgensen, Brian & Messner, Martin, 2010. "Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 184-204, February.
    7. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    8. Antonio Davila & Daniel Oyon, 2009. "Introduction to the Special Section on Accounting, Innovation and Entrepreneurship," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 277-280.
    9. Bledow, Ronald & Frese, Michael & Anderson, Neil & Erez, Miriam & Farr, James, 2009. "A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 305-337, September.
    10. Kwee Keong Choong, 2014. "The fundamentals of performance measurement systems," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(7), pages 879-922, September.
    11. Sebastian Janssen & Klaus Moeller & Marten Schlaefke, 2011. "Using performance measures conceptually in innovation control," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 107-128, September.
    12. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02312197, HAL.
    13. Pratima Bansal & Wendy Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02276705, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "Misfit? The Use of Metrics in Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Müller-Stewens, Benedikt & Widener, Sally K. & Möller, Klaus & Steinmann, Jan-Christoph, 2020. "The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Eva Lövstål & Anne-Marie Jontoft, 2017. "Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 41-79, February.
    4. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    5. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    6. Andrea Fried, 2017. "Terminological distinctions of ‘control’: a review of the implications for management control research in the context of innovation," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-40, February.
    7. Emer Curtis & Breda Sweeney, 2017. "Managing different types of innovation: mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 313-343, April.
    8. Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia & Patrícia Jardim Da Palma & Liliana Pitacho & Fabrício Castagna Lunardi, 2022. "The Conceptual Model of Role Stress and Job Burnout in Judges: The Moderating Role of Career Calling," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Thambar, Paul J. & Brown, David A. & Sivabalan, Prabhu, 2019. "Managing systemic uncertainty: The role of industry-level management controls and hybrids," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Henri, Jean-François & Wouters, Marc, 2020. "Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Lee, Chia-Ling & Wang, Wen-Ying, 2020. "Strategy, accountants’ activities and new product development performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Masquefa, Bertrand & Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2017. "Developing appreciation of micro-organizational processes of accounting change and indicating pathways to more ‘Enabling Accounting’ in a micro-organizational domain of research and development," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 59-82.
    13. Pfister, Jan A. & Jack, Sarah L. & Darwin, Solomon N., 2017. "Strategizing open innovation: How middle managers work with performance indicators," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 139-150.
    14. Pasi Aaltola, 2019. "Strategic thinking and accounting: potentials and pitfalls from a managerial perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 323-351, October.
    15. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    17. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    18. Mariastella Messina & Antonio Leotta, 2023. "Management control package in the portfolio project selection process. Empirical evidence from semiconductor industry," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 25-42.
    19. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Stefea Petru & Bobitan Roxana-Ioana, 2015. "Integrated Reporting - A More Holistic Picture For A Company," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 448-456, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:332-:d:596305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.