IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v12y2021i5p581-591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society

Author

Listed:
  • Carole‐Anne Sénit
  • Frank Biermann

Abstract

Global civil society is often uncritically seen as a democratic force in global governance. Civil society organizations claim to hold states and intergovernmental institutions accountable and channel the voices of the world’s poorest people in policy making. Yet to what extent do they succeed in performing that role? This article assesses the representation of the poor in global civil society, with a focus on the negotiations of the Sustainable Development Goals, a process widely hailed as one of the most democratic ever organized by the United Nations. We first analyse how the poor and their local representatives are procedurally included in global civil society (procedural representation). We then quantitatively assess the actual representation of civil society organizations from the world’s poorest countries in the civil society hearings of the SDG negotiations, where civil society was invited to speak on behalf of their constituencies (geographical representation). Finally, we evaluate the extent to which global civil society representatives who claim to speak on behalf of the poor legitimately represented the interests of these people (discursive representation). We found that global civil society fails to fully represent the poor on procedural, geographical and discursive terms, and eventually perpetuates postcolonial injustices in global sustainability governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Carole‐Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann, 2021. "In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 581-591, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:581-591
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biermann, Frank & Gupta, Aarti, 2011. "Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1856-1864, September.
    2. Mary Kaldor, 2003. "Civil Society and Accountability," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 5-27.
    3. Heike Schroeder & Maxwell T. Boykoff & Laura Spiers, 2012. "Equity and state representations in climate negotiations," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 834-836, December.
    4. Amrita Narlikar, 2006. "Fairness in International Trade Negotiations: Developing Countries in the GATT and WTO," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 1005-1029, August.
    5. Mizan Khan & Stacy-ann Robinson & Romain Weikmans & David Ciplet & J. Timmons Roberts, 2020. "Correction to: Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 271-271, July.
    6. Charles Roger & Satishkumar Belliethathan, 2016. "Africa in the global climate change negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 91-108, February.
    7. Andy Sumner & Eduardo Ortiz-Juarez & Christopher Hoy, 2020. "Precarity and the pandemic: COVID-19 and poverty incidence, intensity, and severity in developing countries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-77, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Mizan Khan & Stacy-ann Robinson & Romain Weikmans & David Ciplet & J. Timmons Roberts, 2020. "Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 251-269, July.
    9. Jen Iris Allan & Peter Dauvergne, 2013. "The Global South in Environmental Negotiations: the politics of coalitions in +," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 1307-1322.
    10. Peter M. Haas, 2004. "Addressing the Global Governance Deficit," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Kashwan, Prakash & MacLean, Lauren M. & García-López, Gustavo A., 2019. "Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 133-146.
    12. Adil Najam, 2004. "Dynamics of the Southern Collective: Developing Countries in Desertification Negotiations," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 4(3), pages 128-154, August.
    13. Biermann, Frank & Gupta, Aarti, 2011. "Accountability and legitimacy: An analytical challenge for earth system governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1854-1855, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Litre & Fabrice Hirsch & Patrick Caron & Alexander Andrason & Nathalie Bonnardel & Valerie Fointiat & Wilhelmina Onyothi Nekoto & Jade Abbott & Cristiana Dobre & Juliana Dalboni & Agnès Steuc, 2022. "Participatory Detection of Language Barriers towards Multilingual Sustainability(ies) in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Joanna Stanberry & David F. Murphy & Janis Bragan Balda, 2024. "Recognising Ecological Reflexivity: An Alternative Approach to Partnership Capabilities for Collaborative Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Claudia Speidel, 2024. "The impact of cultural settings on sustainability narratives: an explorative study with the Indian diaspora," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Louis J. Kotzé & Benoit Mayer & Harro van Asselt & Joana Setzer & Frank Biermann & Nicolas Celis & Sam Adelman & Bridget Lewis & Amanda Kennedy & Helen Arling & Birgit Peters, 2024. "Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 5-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carole-Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni, 2017. "The Representativeness of Global Deliberation: A Critical Assessment of Civil Society Consultations for Sustainable Development," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 62-72, February.
    2. Nasiritousi, Naghmeh & Hjerpe, Mattias & Buhr, Katarina, 2014. "Pluralising climate change solutions? Views held and voiced by participants at the international climate change negotiations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 177-184.
    3. Adam Bumpus & Thu-Ba Huynh & Sophie Pascoe, 2019. "Making REDD+ Transparent: Opportunities for MobileTechnology," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 85-117, November.
    4. Dylan Bugden & Jesse Brazil, 2024. "The role of geostrategic interests in motivating public support for foreign climate aid," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 803-813, December.
    5. Duncan Weaver, 2018. "The Aarhus convention and process cosmopolitanism," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 199-213, April.
    6. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    7. Teresa Kramarz & Susan Park, 2016. "Accountability in Global Environmental Governance: A Meaningful Tool for Action?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Cathrin Zengerling, 2019. "Governing the City of Flows: How Urban Metabolism Approaches May Strengthen Accountability in Strategic Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 187-199.
    9. Heidi K. Edmonds & C. A. Knox Lovell & Julie E. Lovell, 2022. "The Inequities of National Adaptation to Climate Change," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Joseph Earsom, 2024. "Fit for purpose? Just Energy Transition Partnerships and accountability in international climate governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 135-141, February.
    11. Klusáček, Petr & Alexandrescu, Filip & Osman, Robert & Malý, Jiří & Kunc, Josef & Dvořák, Petr & Frantál, Bohumil & Havlíček, Marek & Krejčí, Tomáš & Martinát, Stanislav & Skokanová, Hana & Trojan, Ja, 2018. "Good governance as a strategic choice in brownfield regeneration: Regional dynamics from the Czech Republic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 29-39.
    12. Adelaide Glover & Heike Schroeder, 2017. "Legitimacy in REDD+ governance in Indonesia," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 695-708, October.
    13. Karlijn Muiderman & Aarti Gupta & Joost Vervoort & Frank Biermann, 2020. "Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: Different conceptions of the future and implications for the present," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    14. Antoine Mandel & Timothy Tiggeloven & Daniel Lincke & Elco Koks & Philip Ward & Jochen Hinkel, 2021. "Risks on global financial stability induced by climate change: the case of flood risks," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Rosendal, G. Kristin & Schei, Peter Johan, 2014. "How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for ‘Payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 75-82.
    16. Jan Fagerberg & Staffan Laestadius & Ben R. Martin, 2016. "The Triple Challenge for Europe: The Economy, Climate Change, and Governance," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 178-204, May.
    17. Philipp Pattberg & Cille Kaiser & Oscar Widerberg & Johannes Stripple, 2022. "20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 295-315, June.
    18. Neli Aparecida de Mello-Théry & Eduardo de Lima Caldas & Beatriz M. Funatsu & Damien Arvor & Vincent Dubreuil, 2020. "Climate Change and Public Policies in the Brazilian Amazon State of Mato Grosso: Perceptions and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Manjana Milkoreit & Kate Haapala, 2019. "The global stocktake: design lessons for a new review and ambition mechanism in the international climate regime," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 89-106, February.
    20. Leslie Lipper & Romina Cavatassi & Ricci Symons & Alashiya Gordes & Oliver Page, 2021. "Financing adaptation for resilient livelihoods under food system transformation: the role of Multilateral Development Banks," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1525-1540, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:581-591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.