IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4851-d1092012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Anđelini

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Danko Cvitan

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Melissa Prelac

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Igor Pasković

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Marko Černe

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Ivan Nemet

    (Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Horvatovac 102a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Nikola Major

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Smiljana Goreta Ban

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Zoran Užila

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Tea Zubin Ferri

    (MAR LAB d.o.o., Vukovarska Ulica 22, 52100 Pula, Croatia)

  • Branka Njegić Džakula

    (Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička Cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Marko Petek

    (Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Dean Ban

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

  • Igor Palčić

    (Institute of Agriculture and Turism, Karla Huguesa 8, 52440 Poreč, Croatia)

Abstract

In recent years, the production and application of biochar as a soil amendment produced from pruning residues has gained attention worldwide. Since the effect of grapevine rootstock type on grapevine-pruning residues used as feedstock for biochar production had not yet been researched, the present research was performed. Two grapevine rootstocks, different in vigor, were selected, with the hypothesis that they would affect their chemical composition and, consequently, the composition of the produced biochar. In this work, grapevine-pruning residues of the indigenous variety “Istrian Malvasia” ( Vitis vinifera L.) grafted on 420A and SO4 rootstocks were analyzed and used for biochar production under three peak temperature programs (400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C). Higher pyrolysis temperature decreased yield but increased EC, ash, and TC content, as well as the content of most of the studied elements. On the other hand, grapevine rootstock type affected biochar EC, ash content, and specific surface area. Results showed that a more vigorous rootstock affects the produced biochar qualities by enhancing the above-mentioned properties. The present research showed that biochar produced from grapevine-pruning residues, especially at 500 °C or 600 °C, could be a valuable tool for the valorization of this biomass as a soil amendment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Anđelini & Danko Cvitan & Melissa Prelac & Igor Pasković & Marko Černe & Ivan Nemet & Nikola Major & Smiljana Goreta Ban & Zoran Užila & Tea Zubin Ferri & Branka Njegić Džakula & Marko Petek &, 2023. "Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4851-:d:1092012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhishek Kumar & Tanushree Bhattacharya, 2021. "Biochar: a sustainable solution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 6642-6680, May.
    2. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Dávila, Izaskun & Gullón, Beatriz & Labidi, Jalel & Gullón, Patricia, 2019. "Multiproduct biorefinery from vine shoots: Bio-ethanol and lignin production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 612-623.
    4. Samy Sadaka & Mahmoud A. Sharara & Amanda Ashworth & Patrick Keyser & Fred Allen & Andrew Wright, 2014. "Characterization of Biochar from Switchgrass Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiago Florindo & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Residual Biomass Recovery in the Wine Sector: Creation of Value Chains for Vine Pruning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Roberts, Cameron & Greene, Jenna & Nemet, Gregory F., 2023. "Key enablers for carbon dioxide removal through the application of biochar to agricultural soils: Evidence from three historical analogues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Xing Yang & Hailong Wang & Peter James Strong & Song Xu & Shujuan Liu & Kouping Lu & Kuichuan Sheng & Jia Guo & Lei Che & Lizhi He & Yong Sik Ok & Guodong Yuan & Ying Shen & Xin Chen, 2017. "Thermal Properties of Biochars Derived from Waste Biomass Generated by Agricultural and Forestry Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Radhakrishnan, Rokesh & Manna, Bharat & Ghosh, Amit, 2023. "Molecular insights into dissolution of lignin bunch in ionic liquid-water mixture for enhanced biomass conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 47-59.
    5. Liang Zhu & Fangbin Wang & Jing Qi, 2024. "Washing walnut shells with the aqueous part of pyrolysis liquids: effect on biomass and pyrolysis product quality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29169-29187, November.
    6. Garita-Cambronero, Jerson & Paniagua-García, Ana I. & Hijosa-Valsero, María & Díez-Antolínez, Rebeca, 2021. "Biobutanol production from pruned vine shoots," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 124-133.
    7. Anupam, Kumar & Sharma, Arvind Kumar & Lal, Priti Shivhare & Dutta, Suman & Maity, Sudip, 2016. "Preparation, characterization and optimization for upgrading Leucaena leucocephala bark to biochar fuel with high energy yielding," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 743-756.
    8. Poonam & Narendra Kumar, 2020. "Experimental and kinetic study of removal of lead (Pb+2) from battery effluent using sweet lemon (Citrus limetta) peel biochar adsorbent," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4379-4406, June.
    9. Nabila, Rakhmawati & Hidayat, Wahyu & Haryanto, Agus & Hasanudin, Udin & Iryani, Dewi Agustina & Lee, Sihyun & Kim, Sangdo & Kim, Soohyun & Chun, Donghyuk & Choi, Hokyung & Im, Hyuk & Lim, Jeonghwan &, 2023. "Oil palm biomass in Indonesia: Thermochemical upgrading and its utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Vera Marcantonio & Luisa Di Paola & Marcello De Falco & Mauro Capocelli, 2023. "Modeling of Biomass Gasification: From Thermodynamics to Process Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    11. Hashemi, Seyed Sajad & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosro, 2020. "Biorefinery development based on whole safflower plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 399-408.
    12. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Christian R. Parra & Angel D. Ramirez & Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia & David Gonzales & Adriana Correa-Guimaraes, 2023. "Prospects for Bioenergy Development Potential from Dedicated Energy Crops in Ecuador: An Agroecological Zoning Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Song, Xiaoxu & Yang, Yang & Zhang, Meng & Zhang, Ke & Wang, Donghai, 2018. "Ultrasonic pelleting of torrefied lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 56-62.
    15. Margarida Casau & Marta Ferreira Dias & João C. O. Matias & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Residual Biomass: A Comprehensive Review on the Importance, Uses and Potential in a Circular Bioeconomy Approach," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Jeeban Poudel & Sea Cheon Oh, 2014. "Effect of Torrefaction on the Properties of Corn Stalk to Enhance Solid Fuel Qualities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Başar, İbrahim Alper & Perendeci, Nuriye Altınay, 2021. "Optimization of zero-waste hydrogen peroxide - Acetic acid pretreatment for sequential ethanol and methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Samal, Biswajit & Vanapalli, Kumar Raja & Dubey, Brajesh Kumar & Bhattacharya, Jayanta & Chandra, Subhash & Medha, Isha, 2021. "Influence of process parameters on thermal characteristics of char from co-pyrolysis of eucalyptus biomass and polystyrene: Its prospects as a solid fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Mohapatra, Sonali & Mishra, Chinmaya & Behera, Sudhansu S. & Thatoi, Hrudayanath, 2017. "Application of pretreatment, fermentation and molecular techniques for enhancing bioethanol production from grass biomass – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1007-1032.
    20. Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Griffin, G.J. & Mubarak, N.M. & Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Abro, Rashid & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Ali, Brahim Si, 2017. "An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1289-1299.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4851-:d:1092012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.