IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v22y2020i5d10.1007_s10668-019-00389-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and kinetic study of removal of lead (Pb+2) from battery effluent using sweet lemon (Citrus limetta) peel biochar adsorbent

Author

Listed:
  • Poonam

    (Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University)

  • Narendra Kumar

    (Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University)

Abstract

The main polluting agents of the environment are different anthropogenic activities; among them, industries are the primary one. Lead (Pb2+) is an extremely toxic metal ion and is the main raw material of lead–acid batteries. The present study focuses on adsorptive removal of lead from battery manufacturing industrial effluent by sweet lemon (Citrus limetta) peel biochar (SLPB). The removal efficiency was about 97.11% at optimum contact time of 160 min with optimum dosage of 3.5 g L−1 at constant temperature. The optimum pH and temperature were recorded to be 5 and 55 ºC with their maximum adsorption capacities of 55.67 and 53.89 mg g−1, respectively. The process obeyed second-order kinetics favoring chemisorption over physisorption. The adsorbent was also characterized by SEM–EDX, XRD, BET and FTIR to validate the results obtained. The results were justified by the functional groups present and changes in morphology of the biochar after treating wastewater. Further, adsorption process preferred Freundlich (r2 = 0.98) adsorption isotherm in comparison with Langmuir (r2 = 0.95) adsorption isotherm. The adsorption process demonstrated that the removal process was multilayered and heterogeneous with maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) of 2840.91 mg g−1 which was higher than most of the values obtained from other materials. Thus, the study concluded that SLPB might be used to overcome the pollution level of metals in our water bodies to maintain the quality of water bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Poonam & Narendra Kumar, 2020. "Experimental and kinetic study of removal of lead (Pb+2) from battery effluent using sweet lemon (Citrus limetta) peel biochar adsorbent," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4379-4406, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00389-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00389-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00389-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-019-00389-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samy Sadaka & Mahmoud A. Sharara & Amanda Ashworth & Patrick Keyser & Fred Allen & Andrew Wright, 2014. "Characterization of Biochar from Switchgrass Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing Yang & Hailong Wang & Peter James Strong & Song Xu & Shujuan Liu & Kouping Lu & Kuichuan Sheng & Jia Guo & Lei Che & Lizhi He & Yong Sik Ok & Guodong Yuan & Ying Shen & Xin Chen, 2017. "Thermal Properties of Biochars Derived from Waste Biomass Generated by Agricultural and Forestry Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Anupam, Kumar & Sharma, Arvind Kumar & Lal, Priti Shivhare & Dutta, Suman & Maity, Sudip, 2016. "Preparation, characterization and optimization for upgrading Leucaena leucocephala bark to biochar fuel with high energy yielding," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 743-756.
    3. Dominik Anđelini & Danko Cvitan & Melissa Prelac & Igor Pasković & Marko Černe & Ivan Nemet & Nikola Major & Smiljana Goreta Ban & Zoran Užila & Tea Zubin Ferri & Branka Njegić Džakula & Marko Petek &, 2023. "Biochar from Grapevine-Pruning Residues Is Affected by Grapevine Rootstock and Pyrolysis Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Christian R. Parra & Angel D. Ramirez & Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia & David Gonzales & Adriana Correa-Guimaraes, 2023. "Prospects for Bioenergy Development Potential from Dedicated Energy Crops in Ecuador: An Agroecological Zoning Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Song, Xiaoxu & Yang, Yang & Zhang, Meng & Zhang, Ke & Wang, Donghai, 2018. "Ultrasonic pelleting of torrefied lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 56-62.
    7. Jeeban Poudel & Sea Cheon Oh, 2014. "Effect of Torrefaction on the Properties of Corn Stalk to Enhance Solid Fuel Qualities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Başar, İbrahim Alper & Perendeci, Nuriye Altınay, 2021. "Optimization of zero-waste hydrogen peroxide - Acetic acid pretreatment for sequential ethanol and methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    9. Samal, Biswajit & Vanapalli, Kumar Raja & Dubey, Brajesh Kumar & Bhattacharya, Jayanta & Chandra, Subhash & Medha, Isha, 2021. "Influence of process parameters on thermal characteristics of char from co-pyrolysis of eucalyptus biomass and polystyrene: Its prospects as a solid fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Mohapatra, Sonali & Mishra, Chinmaya & Behera, Sudhansu S. & Thatoi, Hrudayanath, 2017. "Application of pretreatment, fermentation and molecular techniques for enhancing bioethanol production from grass biomass – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1007-1032.
    11. Nizamuddin, Sabzoi & Baloch, Humair Ahmed & Griffin, G.J. & Mubarak, N.M. & Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Abro, Rashid & Mazari, Shaukat Ali & Ali, Brahim Si, 2017. "An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1289-1299.
    12. Yuta Saito & Kiyoshi Sakuragi & Tetsuya Shoji & Maromu Otaka, 2018. "Expedient Prediction of the Fuel Properties of Carbonized Woody Biomass Based on Hue Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-8, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00389-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.