IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4495-d1086092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilizing Intelligent Portable Bicycle Lights to Assess Urban Bicycle Infrastructure Surfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Tufail Ahmed

    (UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Ali Pirdavani

    (UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
    UHasselt, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Davy Janssens

    (UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Geert Wets

    (UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

Abstract

Vibration from bicycle infrastructure affects the cyclists’ comfort and the choice of this transportation mode. This study uses smart portable bicycle lights to measure the vibration and quantify the level of cycling comfort on cycling infrastructure. A total of 28 bicycle streets and paths were selected in the city of Hasselt, Belgium, as the case study area. Six volunteer cyclists were recruited for the vibration sensitivity test of the device before the actual data collection. The results showed no considerable difference in the vibration recorded separately on each tested bicycle surface. The average vibration values vary from 1 to 17.78, indicating that riding comfort varies significantly across different surfaces. Asphalt and concrete roads had the lowest vibration and were the most comfortable in the study area. In contrast, cobblestone-paved bike paths were the least comfortable because of higher vibration. A comfort level map was developed based on the relationship between cycle vibration and subjective perception of comfort level. Twenty cyclists participated in the perception of vibration test. The comfort level is inversely correlated with the vibration. This methodology is adaptable to any other setting. Additionally, practitioners can use it to check and track the quality of the surface of the bicycle infrastructure over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Tufail Ahmed & Ali Pirdavani & Davy Janssens & Geert Wets, 2023. "Utilizing Intelligent Portable Bicycle Lights to Assess Urban Bicycle Infrastructure Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4495-:d:1086092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menghini, G. & Carrasco, N. & Schüssler, N. & Axhausen, K.W., 2010. "Route choice of cyclists in Zurich," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 754-765, November.
    2. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng, 2019. "Bikeway prioritization to increase bicycle network connectivity and bicycle-transit connection: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 52-71.
    3. Li, Hui & Harvey, John T. & Thigpen, Calvin & Wu, Rongzong, 2013. "Surface Treatment Macrotexture and Bicycle Ride Quality," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3dp663w0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Tufail Ahmed & Mehdi Moeinaddini & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Arshad Jamal & Imran Nawaz & Fawaz Alharbi, 2021. "A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    6. Lowry, Michael B. & Furth, Peter & Hadden-Loh, Tracy, 2016. "Prioritizing new bicycle facilities to improve low-stress network connectivity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 124-140.
    7. Michael Hardinghaus & Panagiotis Papantoniou, 2020. "Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Aghaabbasi, Mahdi & Moeinaddini, Mehdi & Shah, Muahammad Zaly & Asadi-Shekari, Zohreh, 2018. "Addressing issues in the use of Google tools for assessing pedestrian built environments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-198.
    9. Jonas Schmid-Querg & Andreas Keler & Georgios Grigoropoulos, 2021. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Joo, Shinhye & Oh, Cheol, 2013. "A novel method to monitor bicycling environments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Milakis, Dimitris & Athanasopoulos, Konstantinos, 2014. "What about people in cycle network planning? applying participative multicriteria GIS analysis in the case of the Athens metropolitan cycle network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 120-129.
    12. Muhammad Zahid & Yangzhou Chen & Sikandar Khan & Arshad Jamal & Muhammad Ijaz & Tufail Ahmed, 2020. "Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Nuñez, Javier Yesid Mahecha & Bisconsini, Danilo Rinaldi & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2020. "Combining environmental quality assessment of bicycle infrastructures with vertical acceleration measurements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 447-458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irena Fryc & Maciej Listowski & Jiajie Fan & Dariusz Czyżewski, 2024. "Energy-Efficient and Smart Bicycle Lamps: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Tufail Ahmed & Ali Pirdavani & Geert Wets & Davy Janssens, 2024. "Bicycle Infrastructure Design Principles in Urban Bikeability Indices: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    2. Muhammad Ijaz & Lan Liu & Yahya Almarhabi & Arshad Jamal & Sheikh Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Zahid, 2022. "Temporal Instability of Factors Affecting Injury Severity in Helmet-Wearing and Non-Helmet-Wearing Motorcycle Crashes: A Random Parameter Approach with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Melo, Lucas Eduardo Araújo de & Isler, Cassiano Augusto, 2023. "Integrating link count data for enhanced estimation of deterrence functions: A case study of short-term bicycle network interventions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Scott, Darren M. & Lu, Wei & Brown, Matthew J., 2021. "Route choice of bike share users: Leveraging GPS data to derive choice sets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Nuñez, Javier Yesid Mahecha & Bisconsini, Danilo Rinaldi & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2020. "Combining environmental quality assessment of bicycle infrastructures with vertical acceleration measurements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 447-458.
    6. Michael Hardinghaus & Simon Nieland & Marius Lehne & Jan Weschke, 2021. "More than Bike Lanes—A Multifactorial Index of Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Seungkyu Ryu & Anthony Chen & Jacqueline Su & Xintao Liu & Jiangbo (Gabe) Yu, 2021. "Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Arshad Jamal & Farhan Muhammad Butt & Yahya Almarhabi & Rana Faisal Tufail & Meshal Almoshaogeh, 2021. "Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP–BWM Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Furth, Peter G. & Sadeghinasr, Bita & Miranda-Moreno, Luis, 2023. "Slope stress criteria as a complement to traffic stress criteria, and impact on high comfort bicycle accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Mohammed Saleh Alfawzan & Ahmad Aftab, 2022. "Efficiency Assessment of New Signal Timing in Saudi Arabia Implementing Flashing Green Interval Complimented with Law Enforcement Cameras," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Márquez, Luis & Soto, Jose J., 2021. "Integrating perceptions of safety and bicycle theft risk in the analysis of cycling infrastructure preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 285-301.
    12. Wang, Haizhong & Palm, Matthew & Chen, Chen & Vogt, Rachel & Wang, Yiyi, 2016. "Does bicycle network level of traffic stress (LTS) explain bicycle travel behavior? Mixed results from an Oregon case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 8-18.
    13. Jonas Schmid-Querg & Andreas Keler & Georgios Grigoropoulos, 2021. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Passmore, Reid & Watkins, Kari & Guensler, Randall, 2024. "Using shortest path routing to assess cycling networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    16. Pucher, John & Buehler, Ralph & Seinen, Mark, 2011. "Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 451-475, July.
    17. Calvey, J.C. & Shackleton, J.P. & Taylor, M.D. & Llewellyn, R., 2015. "Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 134-143.
    18. Cai, Yanpeng & Applegate, Scott & Yue, Wencong & Cai, Jianying & Wang, Xuan & Liu, Gengyuan & Li, Chunhui, 2017. "A hybrid life cycle and multi-criteria decision analysis approach for identifying sustainable development strategies of Beijing's taxi fleet," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 314-325.
    19. Synek, Stefan & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2018. "Exploring adoption determinants of tax-subsidized company-leasing bicycles from the perspective of German employers and employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 238-260.
    20. Stefan Flügel & Nina Hulleberg & Aslak Fyhri & Christian Weber & Gretar Ævarsson, 2019. "Empirical speed models for cycling in the Oslo road network," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1395-1419, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4495-:d:1086092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.