IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v129y2019icp217-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Siying
  • Zhu, Feng

Abstract

The cycling comfort level of different cycling infrastructure can strongly influence the comfort perception of cyclists and their route choices. In this paper, the cycling comfort index (CCI) is used to measure the cycling comfort level on cycling infrastructure and describe different cycle track characteristics. An Instrumented Probe Bicycle (IPB), which is equipped with a video camera and a set of sensors including GPS receiver, accelerometer, etc., is employed to collect data while being ridden by cyclist in Singapore. An automatic video processing technique using convolutional neural network (CNN) is applied, such that no direct field measurement is required and the data collection process is less time-consuming. Video-based survey is carried out to capture the correlation between CCI and the comfort perception of cyclists. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) method is employed to build the CCI model dependent on various explanatory variables and survey participants’ ratings. The results show that the overall accuracy of the XGBoost method is 11% higher than the ordered Probit model commonly used in literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:217-231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585641831190X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bai, Lu & Liu, Pan & Chan, Ching-Yao & Li, Zhibin, 2017. "Estimating level of service of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed traffic flow," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 203-217.
    2. Calvey, J.C. & Shackleton, J.P. & Taylor, M.D. & Llewellyn, R., 2015. "Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 134-143.
    3. Zohreh Asadi-Shekari & Mehdi Moeinaddini & Muhammad Zaly Shah, 2013. "Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 166-194, March.
    4. Griswold, Julia B. & Yu, Mengqiao & Filingeri, Victoria & Grembek, Offer & Walker, Joan L., 2018. "A behavioral modeling approach to bicycle level of service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 166-177.
    5. Tilahun, Nebiyou Y. & Levinson, David M. & Krizek, Kevin J., 2007. "Trails, lanes, or traffic: Valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 287-301, May.
    6. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    7. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    8. Joo, Shinhye & Oh, Cheol, 2013. "A novel method to monitor bicycling environments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Daniel J Fagnant & Kara Kockelman, 2016. "A direct-demand model for bicycle counts: the impacts of level of service and other factors," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(1), pages 93-107, January.
    10. Ralph Buehler & Jennifer Dill, 2016. "Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 9-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonas Schmid-Querg & Andreas Keler & Georgios Grigoropoulos, 2021. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Tufail Ahmed & Ali Pirdavani & Davy Janssens & Geert Wets, 2023. "Utilizing Intelligent Portable Bicycle Lights to Assess Urban Bicycle Infrastructure Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khashayar Kazemzadeh & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Lena Winslott Hiselius & Enrico Ronchi, 2020. "Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    3. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    4. Liang, Xiao & Zhang, Tianyu & Xie, Meiquan & Jia, Xudong, 2021. "Analyzing bicycle level of service using virtual reality and deep learning technologies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 115-129.
    5. Siying Zhu & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Multi-objective bike-way network design problem with space–time accessibility constraint," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2479-2503, October.
    6. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    7. Andreas Nikiforiadis & Socrates Basbas & Foteini Mikiki & Aikaterini Oikonomou & Efrosyni Polymeroudi, 2021. "Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Spaces Level of Service: Comparison of Methodologies and Critical Discussion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Laviolette, Jérôme & Morency, Catherine & Waygood, E.O.D., 2022. "A kilometer or a mile? Does buffer size matter when it comes to car ownership?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Tao, Tao & Cao, Jason, 2024. "Ineffective built environment interventions: How to reduce driving in American suburbs?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Umer Mansoor & Mohammad Tamim Kashifi & Fazal Rehman Safi & Syed Masiur Rahman, 2022. "A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1560-1582, February.
    11. Osama, Ahmed & Sayed, Tarek & Bigazzi, Alexander Y., 2017. "Models for estimating zone-level bike kilometers traveled using bike network, land use, and road facility variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-28.
    12. Fitch, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2020. "Road environments and bicyclist route choice: The cases of Davis and San Francisco, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Gabriella Mazzulla & Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti, 2021. "Cycling for a Sustainable Touristic Mobility: A Preliminary Study in an Urban Area of Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl & Skov-Petersen, Hans, 2017. "Bicyclists’ preferences for route characteristics and crowding in Copenhagen – A choice experiment study of commuters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 53-64.
    15. Nuñez, Javier Yesid Mahecha & Bisconsini, Danilo Rinaldi & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2020. "Combining environmental quality assessment of bicycle infrastructures with vertical acceleration measurements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 447-458.
    16. Michael Hardinghaus & Simon Nieland & Marius Lehne & Jan Weschke, 2021. "More than Bike Lanes—A Multifactorial Index of Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Tao, Tao & Wang, Jueyu & Cao, Xinyu, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear associations between spatial attributes and walking distance to transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Mischa Young & Gavin MacGregor & Georges A. Tanguay, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of Montreal’s Réseau Express Vélo (REV) on Surrounding Bike Lanes’ Ridership and the COVID-19 Cycling Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Michael Hardinghaus & Panagiotis Papantoniou, 2020. "Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Fitch, Dillon T. & Carlen, Jane & Handy, Susan L., 2022. "What makes bicyclists comfortable? Insights from a visual preference survey of casual and prospective bicyclists," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 434-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:217-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.