IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3257-d1064403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dialectics of (Deep) Accessible Tourism and Reality—Hermeneutics of a Journey to Madrid

Author

Listed:
  • Jácint Farkas

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Finance and Accountancy, Budapest Business School, H-1149 Budapest, Hungary
    Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences—Eötvös Loránd Research Network (Excellent Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), H-1121 Budapest, Hungary
    Institute for Advanced Studies, Business Ethics Center, Budapest Corvinus University, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Zoltán Raffay

    (Institute of Marketing and Tourism, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Pécs, H-7622 Pécs, Hungary)

  • József Kárpáti

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, HU-6000 Kecskemet, Hungary)

  • Zsófia Fekete-Frojimovics

    (Budapest Business School, Faculty of Commerce, Hospitality and Tourism, HU-1054 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Lóránt Dénes Dávid

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, HU-6000 Kecskemet, Hungary
    Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), H-2100 Godollo, Hungary)

Abstract

The authors have made an attempt in this case study, which is based on ‘subjective’ travel and existence experiences, for the indispensable separation of technical accessibility and fundamental or ‘deep’ accessibility—in both interpretation and application—and then to reconsider these concepts in their special philosophy-centred study, which is at the same time built on empirical inquiries and analyses. This is in line with a series of their publications in high-class periodicals. The authors are aware and understand at first sight that this hybrid analysis method has several shortcomings concerning objectivity expected by the academic community, and also concerning the verification of the findings with exact data. Nevertheless, they are convinced that in today’s world of transdisciplinarity, subjective and objective viewpoints are no longer dimensions mutually excluding each other in research. Accordingly, the ‘artificially’ created boundaries between ontological and epistemological philosophical approaches are not of substantial character either. In fact, their very necessity and even their existence can be questioned at certain types of applications (e.g., hermeneutical and Buddhist analytics). The experiences gained and analyses made by the authors make it clear that technical accessibility, and the interpretation and implementation of fundamental accessibility, as well as the control of these by the actual users, are still hindered by several obstacles. Additionally, the existence or lack of fundamental accessibility is a more significant issue than the mere fact of providing accessibility by technical solutions. Last but not least, it should be remarked that it is just the spirit of fundamental accessibility and its implementation in the real world that is capable of mostly meeting the personal needs for accessibility, which seems to be partially impossible. The paper is hermeneutic in nature, so it seeks to understand and interpret a phenomenon, and not to causally explain something. Accordingly, the reported data (both subjective and objective facts) serve the purpose of hermeneutics and not that of providing empirical proof.

Suggested Citation

  • Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & József Kárpáti & Zsófia Fekete-Frojimovics & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "The Dialectics of (Deep) Accessible Tourism and Reality—Hermeneutics of a Journey to Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3257-:d:1064403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3257/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3257/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urszula Załuska & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha & Alicja Grześkowiak, 2022. "Travelling from Perspective of Persons with Disability: Results of an International Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Wee, Bert van & Geurs, Karst & Chorus, Caspar, 2013. "Information, communication, travel behavior and accessibility," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16.
    3. Fernando Borrajo-Millán & María-del-Mar Alonso-Almeida & María Escat-Cortes & Liu Yi, 2021. "Sentiment Analysis to Measure Quality and Build Sustainability in Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Marjan Kamyabi & Habib Alipour, 2022. "An Investigation of the Challenges Faced by the Disabled Population and the Implications for Accessible Tourism: Evidence from a Mediterranean Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & Edit Ilona Pallás & Zsófia Fekete-Frojimovics & Martin Balázs Zsarnóczky & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Contexts of Networking and Travelling in the Light of Buddhist “Wisdom” and Life Philosophy—Management of Accessibility and Barrier Generation in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Vijay Kumar & Hammam Alshazly & Sahar Ahmed Idris & Sami Bourouis, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on Society, Environment, Economy, and Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Kropotkin, Petr, 1902. "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number kropotkin1902.
    8. Jácint Farkas & Zoltán Raffay & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Fundamental Accessibility and Technical Accessibility in Travels—The Encounter of Two Worlds Which Leads to a Paradigm Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacy SACHS, 2004. "Inclusive development and decent work for all," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 161-184, March.
    2. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "Darwinism and Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 85-97, March.
    3. Francesco Scotognella, 2024. "The importance of education in comprehending and judging technology," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(1), pages 29-34.
    4. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Glaser-Segura, Daniel & Anghel, Laurentiu-Dan, 2003. "Empirical Study Of Institutions Romania," MPRA Paper 9157, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    6. Soleri, Daniela & Kleinman, Nathaniel & Newburn, Rebecca, 2021. "Community Seed Groups: Biological and Especially Social Investigations Can Support Crisis Response Capacity," SocArXiv swv47, Center for Open Science.
    7. Duco Vos & Evert Meijers & Maarten Ham, 2018. "Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 375-398, September.
    8. Chenguang Hu & Kyung Hwan Yun & Ziqi Su & Chang Xi, 2022. "Effective Crisis Management during Adversity: Organizing Resilience Capabilities of Firms and Sustainable Performance during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Monika Bąk & Przemyslaw Borkowski, 2019. "Young Transport Users’ Perception of ICT Solutions Change," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Myriam Caratù & Valerio Brescia & Ilaria Pigliautile & Paolo Biancone, 2023. "Assessing Energy Communities’ Awareness on Social Media with a Content and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Danilo Silva Carvalho & Lucas Lopes Felipe & Priscila Costa Albuquerque & Fabio Zicker & Bruna de Paula Fonseca, 2023. "Leadership and international collaboration on COVID-19 research: reducing the North–South divide?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4689-4705, August.
    12. Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    13. Tarik Tazdaït & Alejandro Caparros & Jean-Chrsitophe Péreau, 2008. "Mutual Aid: An Indirect Evolution Analysis," Working Papers halshs-00275386, HAL.
    14. Zak, F., 2021. "On some models of altruistic behavior," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 12-52.
    15. Wen, Jian & Nassir, Neema & Zhao, Jinhua, 2019. "Value of demand information in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 346-359.
    16. Zygmunt Kruczek & Katarzyna Gmyrek & Danuta Ziżka & Karolina Korbiel & Karolina Nowak, 2023. "Accessibility of Cultural Heritage Sites for People with Disabilities: A Case Study on Krakow Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Naser Valizadeh & Latif Haji & Masoud Bijani & Negin Fallah Haghighi & Mahsa Fatemi & Ants-Hannes Viira & Yenny Katherine Parra-Acosta & Alishir Kurban & Hossein Azadi, 2021. "Development of a Scale to Remove Farmers’ Sustainability Barriers to Meteorological Information in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    19. Wu, Guoqiang & Hong, Jinhyun, 2022. "An analysis of the role of residential location on the relationships between time spent online and non-mandatory activity-travel time use over time," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Jamal Al Qundus & Shivam Gupta & Hesham Abusaimeh & Silvio Peikert & Adrian Paschke, 2023. "Prescriptive Analytics-Based SIRM Model for Predicting Covid-19 Outbreak," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 235-246, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3257-:d:1064403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.