IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1756-d1038566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Socio-Technical Framework for Lean Project Management Implementation towards Sustainable Value in the Digital Transformation Context

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Felizardo Lima

    (LATEC—Laboratory of Technology, Business Management and Environment, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24000-000, Brazil)

  • Julio Vieira Neto

    (LATEC—Laboratory of Technology, Business Management and Environment, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24000-000, Brazil)

  • Renan Silva Santos

    (LATEC—Laboratory of Technology, Business Management and Environment, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro 24000-000, Brazil
    Industrial Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil)

Abstract

Motivated by the project uncertainties of complex realities brought by the fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0 (I4.0), researchers must look at Lean project management (LPM) soft skills as a new mindset to have a holistic view of customer needs and to improve value to the organization. In the digital transformation era, it is essential that Lean practitioners develop socio-technical thinking while also prioritizing interpersonal soft skills that directly affect their ability to solve problems in order for the company to grow sustainably. This paper aims to identify the critical soft skills (CSSs) to implement LPM in the I4.0 era and to investigate, from the perspective of organizations, the latent factors for LPM implementation that generate sustainable value. For this purpose, a mixed-method approach was used, combining literature review and a survey with 166 Brazilian professionals. This empirical study intends to set the CSSs from a practice perspective and explore the benefits they generate throughout the organization. Data analysis was conducted with descriptive statistics and factorial analysis. Research findings revealed convergences regarding the practitioners’ perception regarding the ten CSSs identified in the literature, and portray two latent factors, human and process factors, which can assist decision-makers in implementing LPM by offering a better perspective of the key factors that add sustainable value for companies in the digital transformation context. This study contributes to the debate on rethinking traditional skills, accentuates the need for adjustments, and proposes a socio-technical framework that can be used in a project manager’s routine to enable better Lean project execution, help with decision making, and increase the understanding and meeting of customer needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Felizardo Lima & Julio Vieira Neto & Renan Silva Santos & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2023. "A Socio-Technical Framework for Lean Project Management Implementation towards Sustainable Value in the Digital Transformation Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1756-:d:1038566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Satish & Choudhary, Alok & Cai, Xianming & Yang, Kai, 2015. "Value stream mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 202-212.
    2. Bo Zhang & Zhanwen Niu & Chaochao Liu, 2020. "Lean Tools, Knowledge Management, and Lean Sustainability: The Moderating Effects of Study Conventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Guinan, Patricia J. & Parise, Salvatore & Langowitz, Nan, 2019. "Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 717-727.
    4. van Dun, Desirée H. & Hicks, Jeff N. & Wilderom, Celeste P.M., 2017. "Values and behaviors of effective lean managers: Mixed-methods exploratory research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 174-186.
    5. Tor Helge Aas & Ahmad Alaassar, 2018. "The Impact Of Visual Performance Management On Decision-Making In The Entrepreneurial Process," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(05), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ayush Gupta, 2020. "Framework for sustainable maintenance system: ISM–fuzzy MICMAC and TOPSIS approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 643-676, July.
    2. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Prikshat, Verma & Islam, Mohammad & Patel, Parth & Malik, Ashish & Budhwar, Pawan & Gupta, Suraksha, 2023. "AI-Augmented HRM: Literature review and a proposed multilevel framework for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Péter Tamás, 2018. "Innovative Business Model for Realization of Sustainable Supply Chain at the Outsourcing Examination of Logistics Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Manville, Graham & Greatbanks, Richard, 2020. "Performance management in hybrid organisations: A study in social housing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 533-545.
    6. Lleo, A. & Ruiz-Palomino, P. & Viles, E. & Muñoz-Villamizar, A.F., 2021. "A valid and reliable scale for measuring middle managers’ trustworthiness in continuous improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Walter, Katharina, 2020. "Communicating the family firm brand: Antecedents and performance effects," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 95-107.
    8. Afonso Vaz de Oliveira & Carina M. Oliveira Pimentel & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Susana M. Palavra Garrido, 2022. "Improvement of the Logistics Flows in the Receiving Process of a Warehouse," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Yuanqin Ge, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The impact of dynamic knowledge management capability on enterprise innovation performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1048-1059, December.
    10. Ashwani Kumar Dhingra & Sunil Kumar & Bhim Singh, 2019. "Cost reduction and quality improvement through Lean-Kaizen concept using value stream map in Indian manufacturing firms," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 792-800, August.
    11. Xiaonan Fan & Ye Wang & Xinyuan Lu, 2022. "Digital Transformation Drives Sustainable Innovation Capability Improvement in Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on FsQCA and NCA Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Noureddine Dahmani & Amine Belhadi & Khalid Benhida & Said Elfezazi & Fatima Ezahra Touriki & Yassine Azougagh, 2022. "Integrating lean design and eco-design to improve product design: From literature review to an operational framework," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 189-219, February.
    13. Oliveira, Gilson Adamczuk & Tan, Kim Hua & Guedes, Bruno Turmina, 2018. "Lean and green approach: An evaluation tool for new product development focused on small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 62-73.
    14. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Ionel Ciprian Alecu, 2022. "The Online Adapted Transformational Leadership and Workforce Innovation within the Software Development Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Nemanja Berber & Agneš Slavić & Marko Aleksić, 2020. "Relationship between Perceived Teamwork Effectiveness and Team Performance in Banking Sector of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Luxing Liu & Keyu Lei & Hong Jin & Yin-Pei Teng, 2023. "R&D Investment, Executive Incentive, and Financial Performance in GEM: Based on Three-Stage Least Squares Method," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    17. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Anupama Prashar & Jiju Antony & Flavio S. Fogliatto & Vicente Gonzalez & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2024. "Industry 4.0 adoption for healthcare supply chain performance during COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and India: the mediating role of resilience abilities development," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 389-405, June.
    18. Kozarkiewicz Alina, 2020. "General and Specific: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Project Processes and Management Methods," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 237-248, January.
    19. Francesco Ceresia, 2023. "A System Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environment for Online Formative (Self-)Assessment of Wanna-Be Entrepreneurs’ Performance Management Capabilities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Li, Xiaolin & Zhang, Mengjie & Liu, Weiwei & Wang, Ziyue, 2024. "The impact of entrepreneurial co-founders' support on founders' entrepreneurial resilience in the high-tech industry: The roles of perceived digital technology and perceived failure-tolerant climate," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1756-:d:1038566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.