IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial2-part2p601-620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Work Efficiency in a Manufacturing Setting Using Gemba Walk

Author

Listed:
  • Branislav Micieta
  • Honorata Howaniec
  • Vladimíra Binasova
  • Marta Kasajova
  • Miroslav Fusko

Abstract

Purpose: This paper deals with the increasing work efficiency in the selected company. The literature review contains process improvement approaches in the field of increasing work efficiency. Implementation of lean production has brought continual improvement for manufacturers to remain competitive in the markets. Design/Methodology/Approach: There is a case study and an analysis of the current state of the company that is operating internationally in industrial and professional electronics. Based on a practical application of a lean management method which is called Gemba Walk and the consultation with the employees, the result is the Ishikawa diagram and a priority matrix and evaluation results of these methods. Findings: These results in the work served to suggest improving awareness and the importance of lean management in work environments. The case study is focused on the presentation of the proposed measures, the aim of which is to increase work efficiency and to motivate the employees to work more efficiently. Practical Implications: The individual proposed measures will make it possible to reduce the time spent by the worker in carrying out his work. The work efficiency before and after the implementation of the proposed solutions is also calculated. Originality/Value: The values for the company are the economic assessment of the proposed solutions, their time assessment, comparison of work efficiency, and the benefits of results. Benefits for the selected company are for example increasing the efficiency of work in the cutting room department in the company, minimization of the use of storage means, improving cooperation between picking and shearing, acceleration of the production process and reducing the risk of accidents at work and health problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Branislav Micieta & Honorata Howaniec & Vladimíra Binasova & Marta Kasajova & Miroslav Fusko, 2021. "Increasing Work Efficiency in a Manufacturing Setting Using Gemba Walk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 601-620.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2-part2:p:601-620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2792/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Satish & Choudhary, Alok & Cai, Xianming & Yang, Kai, 2015. "Value stream mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 202-212.
    2. Shaio Yan Huang & Chao-Hsiung Lee & An-An Chiu & David C. Yen, 2015. "How business process reengineering affects information technology investment and employee performance under different performance measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1133-1144, October.
    3. Losonci, Dávid & Demeter, Krisztina & Jenei, István, 2011. "Factors influencing employee perceptions in lean transformations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 30-43, May.
    4. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    5. Wasana Bandara & Guy G Gable & Michael Rosemann, 2005. "Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 347-360, December.
    6. Terziovski, Mile & Fitzpatrick, Paul & O&rsquo & Neill, Peter, 2003. "Successful predictors of business process reengineering (BPR) in financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 35-50, April.
    7. Robert Macintosh & Donald Maclean, 1999. "Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 297-316, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:601-620 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    3. Škrinjar, Rok & Trkman, Peter, 2013. "Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices’," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 48-60.
    4. Marek Szelągowski & Justyna Berniak-Woźny, 2022. "How to improve the assessment of BPM maturity in the era of digital transformation," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 171-198, March.
    5. María Mojarro-Magaña & Jesús Everardo Olguín-Tiznado & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Claudia Camargo-Wilson & Juan Andrés López-Barreras & Rubén Jesús Pérez-López, 2018. "Impact of the Planning from the Kanban System on the Company’s Operating Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Jurczuk Arkadiusz, 2021. "Barriers to implementation of business process governance mechanisms," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 22-38, December.
    7. MacLean, Donald, 2017. "Capacidades dinâmicas, ação criativa e poética," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 57(3), May.
    8. Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.
    9. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Thurer, Matthias, 2021. "Identifying pathways to a high-performing lean automation implementation: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Salvador, Antonio & Knipe, Dar & Kendall, Elaine, 2002. "Structural Change Or Logical Incrementalism? Turbulence In The Global Meat System," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19704, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Ranđelović Aleksandra Stoiljković & Milojević Radenko & Radosavljević Marija, 2018. "Identification and Analysis of Key Business Process Management Factors," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, April.
    12. Parrish, Bradley D., 2010. "Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 510-523, September.
    13. Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ayush Gupta, 2020. "Framework for sustainable maintenance system: ISM–fuzzy MICMAC and TOPSIS approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 643-676, July.
    14. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Suning Zhu & Ashish Gupta & David Paradice & Casey Cegielski, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Immersion and Authenticity on Satisfaction Behavior in Learning Analytics Tasks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 791-814, August.
    16. Mark Geoghegan & Kathryn Cormican & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Sustainable Team Design: A Challenge to Traditional Beliefs in Information-Intensive Service Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2013. "A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 281-292.
    18. Péter Tamás, 2018. "Innovative Business Model for Realization of Sustainable Supply Chain at the Outsourcing Examination of Logistics Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Tung-Hsien Wu & Shi-Ming Huang & Shaio Yan Huang & David C. Yen, 2017. "The effect of competencies, team problem-solving ability, and computer audit activity on internal audit performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1133-1148, October.
    20. Chih-Ming Luo & Hung-Fan Chang, 2013. "Safety process innovation in medical service industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2915-2931, August.
    21. Bill McKelvey & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein & Pierpaolo Andriani, 2012. "When organisations and ecosystems interact: toward a law of requisite fractality in firms," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 104-136.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enterprise; efficiency; Ishikawa diagram; Gemba Walk; priority matrix; process improvement.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2-part2:p:601-620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.