IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i1p22-d767027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the Logistics Flows in the Receiving Process of a Warehouse

Author

Listed:
  • Afonso Vaz de Oliveira

    (Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Carina M. Oliveira Pimentel

    (Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    GOVCOPP, Unidade de Investigação em Governança, Competitividade e Políticas Públicas, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Radu Godina

    (UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • João Carlos de Oliveira Matias

    (Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    GOVCOPP, Unidade de Investigação em Governança, Competitividade e Políticas Públicas, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Susana M. Palavra Garrido

    (CeBER, Faculty of Economics, Universidade de Coimbra, Av Dias da Silva 165, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

Background : The present work is related to a project developed in a company dealing with the security and communication systems, fire alarms, and electronic displays sector, located in the district of Aveiro. This work aims to improve the logistics flow of material reception in the warehouse of a company by using case study research methodology. Methods : Initially, there were too many queues at reception and high throughput times. The approach used to solve these problems was balancing the workstations, with the help of industrial simulation software (Arena ® ) and changing the existing layout, making the queues residual in order to reduce the throughput times. Results : Considerable savings were achieved with this approach in terms of operational costs. A reduction of the throughput time by 28% is reached and a reduced number of workstations is achieved, as well as a greater capacity to receive more material without the need for further investment. Conclusions : The changes in the layout allowed improvements at the ergonomic level and greater organization (5 S’s) at the workstations, thus having a positive impact on the employees’ working conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Afonso Vaz de Oliveira & Carina M. Oliveira Pimentel & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Susana M. Palavra Garrido, 2022. "Improvement of the Logistics Flows in the Receiving Process of a Warehouse," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:22-:d:767027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/1/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyagi, Satish & Choudhary, Alok & Cai, Xianming & Yang, Kai, 2015. "Value stream mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 202-212.
    2. Miao, Zhaowei & Lim, Andrew & Ma, Hong, 2009. "Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-115, January.
    3. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "The potentials of augmented reality in supply chain management: a state-of-the-art review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 819-856, October.
    4. Miloš Hitka & Róbert Sedmák & Pavel Joščák & Lenka Ližbetinová, 2018. "Positive Secular Trend in Slovak Population Urges on Updates of Functional Dimensions of Furniture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Rouwenhorst, B. & Reuter, B. & Stockrahm, V. & van Houtum, G. J. & Mantel, R. J. & Zijm, W. H. M., 2000. "Warehouse design and control: Framework and literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 515-533, May.
    6. Amalendu Singha Mahapatra & Hardik N Soni & Maheswar Singha Mahapatra & Biswajit Sarkar & Sanat Majumder, 2021. "A Continuous Review Production-Inventory System with a Variable Preparation Time in a Fuzzy Random Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Chia-Nan Wang & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen, 2020. "A Computational Model for Determining Levels of Factors in Inventory Management Using Response Surface Methodology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Yu, Wooyeon & Egbelu, Pius J., 2008. "Scheduling of inbound and outbound trucks in cross docking systems with temporary storage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 377-396, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Kulińska & Małgorzata Dendera-Gruszka, 2022. "New Perspectives for Logistics Processes in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buijs, Paul & Vis, Iris F.A. & Carlo, Héctor J., 2014. "Synchronization in cross-docking networks: A research classification and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 593-608.
    2. Maxim A. Dulebenets, 2018. "A Diploid Evolutionary Algorithm for Sustainable Truck Scheduling at a Cross-Docking Facility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Berghman, Lotte & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Practical solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 787-799.
    4. Dulebenets, Maxim A., 2019. "A Delayed Start Parallel Evolutionary Algorithm for just-in-time truck scheduling at a cross-docking facility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 236-258.
    5. Fatma Essghaier & Hamid Allaoui & Gilles Goncalves, 2021. "Truck to door assignment in a shared cross-dock under uncertainty," Post-Print hal-04066589, HAL.
    6. Ladier, Anne-Laure & Alpan, Gülgün, 2016. "Cross-docking operations: Current research versus industry practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 145-162.
    7. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Hoeck, Michael & Kauderer, Markus, 2015. "Part logistics in the automotive industry: Decision problems, literature review and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 107-120.
    8. Saeid Rezaei & Amirsaman Kheirkhah, 2018. "A comprehensive approach in designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network using cross-docking operations," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 51-98, March.
    9. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Felix Weidinger, 2017. "Truck Scheduling in the Postal Service Industry," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 723-736, May.
    10. Rijal, Arpan & Bijvank, Marco & de Koster, René, 2019. "Integrated scheduling and assignment of trucks at unit-load cross-dock terminals with mixed service mode dock doors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 752-771.
    11. Van Belle, Jan & Valckenaers, Paul & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2012. "Cross-docking: State of the art," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 827-846.
    12. Gelareh, Shahin & Monemi, Rahimeh Neamatian & Semet, Frédéric & Goncalves, Gilles, 2016. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1144-1152.
    13. L. Michel & A. Shvartsman & E. Sonderegger & P. Hentenryck, 2011. "Optimal deployment of eventually-serializable data services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 273-294, April.
    14. Peter Bodnar & René de Koster & Kaveh Azadeh, 2017. "Scheduling Trucks in a Cross-Dock with Mixed Service Mode Dock Doors," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 112-131, February.
    15. Konur, Dinçer & Golias, Mihalis M., 2013. "Cost-stable truck scheduling at a cross-dock facility with unknown truck arrivals: A meta-heuristic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 71-91.
    16. Zhaowei Miao & Feng Yang & Ke Fu & Dongsheng Xu, 2012. "Transshipment service through crossdocks with both soft and hard time windows," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 21-47, January.
    17. Claudia R. Rosales & Michael J. Fry & Rajesh Radhakrishnan, 2009. "Transfreight Reduces Costs and Balances Workload at Georgetown Crossdock," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 316-328, August.
    18. Bruno, Giuseppe & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2014. "The capacitated Lot Sizing model: A powerful tool for logistics decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 380-390.
    19. Boysen, Nils & Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Stephan, Konrad, 2023. "A review of synchronization problems in parts-to-picker warehouses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1374-1390.
    20. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2010. "Cross dock scheduling: Classification, literature review and research agenda," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 413-422, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:22-:d:767027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.