IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12341-d1216740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enablers for Adopting Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directives by Electronic Manufacturing Service Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Jeng-Chieh Cheng

    (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Jeen-Fong Li

    (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Yo Huang

    (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

The Electronic Manufacturing Service (EMS) industry contributes significantly to toxic waste generation due to its fabrication processes. Notably, adherence to the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive varies amongst EMS providers, despite its aim to reduce electronic waste. This study explores the factors influencing EMS providers’ decision to adopt the RoHS directive, utilizing the technology–organization–environment (TOE) and the human–organization–technology (HOT) fit, or the TOE-HOT fit framework. We validated our framework using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), based on responses from 379 questionnaires from major EMS providers. The results demonstrated that expert resources, adequate resources, perceived industrial pressure, institutional pressure, and costs were positively associated with RoHS adoption. However, innovation, relative advantage, and verification ability were identified as significant barriers. In particular, innovation in the human dimension was the key determinant for RoHS adoption. Therefore, clear policy instruments and regulations may enhance RoHS adoption by EMS providers. These findings can guide environmental policy definitions in governmental laws and strategies, encouraging EMS providers and other firms to adopt RoHS standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeng-Chieh Cheng & Jeen-Fong Li & Chi-Yo Huang, 2023. "Enablers for Adopting Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directives by Electronic Manufacturing Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-45, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12341-:d:1216740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2003. "Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 251-268, December.
    2. Grinstein, Amir & Goldman, Arieh, 2006. "Characterizing the technology firm: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 121-143, February.
    3. Hobday, Mike, 1998. "Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 689-710, February.
    4. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Weijters, Bert & Cabooter, Elke & Schillewaert, Niels, 2010. "The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 236-247.
    6. James Y. L. Thong & Chee-Sing Yap & K. S. Raman, 1996. "Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 248-267, June.
    7. Keld Laursen & Nicolai J. Foss, 2003. "New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(2), pages 243-263, March.
    8. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    9. Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Peijie Jiang & Mailizar Mailizar & Akhmad Habibi, 2022. "Predicting Factors Influencing Preservice Teachers’ Behavior Intention in the Implementation of STEM Education Using Partial Least Squares Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Mohammad Mahdi Rounaghi & Hajer Jarrar & Leo-Paul Dana, 2021. "Implementation of strategic cost management in manufacturing companies: overcoming costs stickiness and increasing corporate sustainability," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Jan-Michael Becker & Christian Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Franziska Völckner, 2015. "How collinearity affects mixture regression results," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 643-659, December.
    12. Sumalee Pumpinyo & Vilas Nitivattananon, 2014. "Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Sajid Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Farman Ullah Khan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Mapping Interactions among Green Innovations Barriers in Manufacturing Industry Using Hybrid Methodology: Insights from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Geert R. Teisman, 2008. "Complexity and Management of Improvement Programmes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 341-359, May.
    15. Emily E. Griffith & Jacqueline S. Hammersley & Kathryn Kadous, 2015. "Audits of Complex Estimates as Verification of Management Numbers: How Institutional Pressures Shape Practice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 833-863, September.
    16. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    17. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.
    18. Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides & Lida P. Kyrgidou & Daydanda Palihawadana, 2017. "Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Forces," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 585-606, February.
    19. Badar Latif & Zeeshan Mahmood & Ong Tze San & Ridzwana Mohd Said & Allah Bakhsh, 2020. "Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    21. Bart van Ark & Mary O'Mahoney & Marcel P. Timmer, 2008. "The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 25-44, Winter.
    22. Christopher Allen & David M A Mehler, 2019. "Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, May.
    23. Jieqiong Yu & Richard Welford & Peter Hills, 2006. "Industry responses to EU WEEE and ROHS Directives: perspectives from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(5), pages 286-299, December.
    24. Jung-Fa Tsai & Sheng-Che Wu & Thi Khanh Linh Pham & Ming-Hua Lin, 2023. "Analysis of Key Factors for Green Supplier Selection: A Case Study of the Electronics Industry in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    25. Benedikt Martens & Frank Teuteberg, 2012. "Decision-making in cloud computing environments: A cost and risk based approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 871-893, September.
    26. Zulfiqar Ali & Hongyi Sun & Murad Ali, 2017. "The Impact of Managerial and Adaptive Capabilities to Stimulate Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Complementary PLS–SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, November.
    27. Grant, Delvin & Yeo, Benjamin, 2018. "A global perspective on tech investment, financing, and ICT on manufacturing and service industry performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-145.
    28. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    29. Kanagi Kanapathy & Goh Wei Yee & Suhaiza Zailani & Ali Haj Aghapour, 2016. "An intra-regional comparison on RoHS practices for green purchasing management among electrical and electronics SMEs in Southeast Asia," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 249-271.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan J. Frederiks & Sílvia Costa & Boudewijn Hulst & Aard J. Groen, 2024. "The early bird catches the worm: The role of regulatory uncertainty in early adoption of blockchain’s cryptocurrency by fintech ventures," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 790-823, March.
    2. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Davide Castellani & Mariacristina Piva & Torben Schubert & Marco Vivarelli, 2018. "The source of the US /EU Productivity Gap:Less and less effective R&D," LEM Papers Series 2018/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    6. Osama Musa Ali Al-Darras & Cem Tanova, 2022. "From Big Data Analytics to Organizational Agility: What Is the Mechanism?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    7. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    8. Yi-Ying Chang & Paul Hughes & Ian Hodgkinson & Che-Yuan Chang & Yi-Tai Seih, 2022. "The antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship: multilevel, multisource evidence," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 355-390, February.
    9. Maya Vachkova & Arsalan Ghouri & Haidy Ashour & Normalisa Binti Md Isa & Gregory Barnes, 2023. "Big data and predictive analytics and Malaysian micro-, small and medium businesses," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-28, August.
    10. O'Brien, Kieran, 2020. "Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 13-24.
    11. Castellani, Davide & Piva, Mariacristina & Schubert, Torben & Vivarelli, Marco, 2019. "R&D and productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral specificities and differences in the crisis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 279-291.
    12. Chen, Xiayu & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M., 2017. "The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers’ loyalty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1563-1574.
    13. Encarnación García-Sánchez & Víctor J. García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas, 2018. "Influence of Technological Assets on Organizational Performance through Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Innovation and Internal Labour Flexibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Gaofeng Wang & Changhoon Shin, 2022. "Influencing Factors of Usage Intention of Metaverse Education Application Platform: Empirical Evidence Based on PPM and TAM Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Encarnación García-Sánchez, 0. "Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    16. Algharabat, Raed & Abdallah Alalwan, Ali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2017. "Three dimensional product presentation quality antecedents and their consequences for online retailers: The moderating role of virtual product experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-217.
    17. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & García-Morales, Victor J. & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & Salmador-Sánchez, Maria Paz, 2021. "Social Media Use and the Challenge of Complexity: Evidence from the Technology Sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 621-640.
    18. P. Bharati & C. Zhang & A. Chaudhury, 2014. "Social media assimilation in firms: Investigating the roles of absorptive capacity and institutional pressures," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 257-272, April.
    19. Hadziroh Ibrahim & Nur Zahiyah Othman, 2014. "The Influence of Techno stress and Organizational-Is Related Support on User Satisfaction in Government Organizations: A Proposed Model and Literature Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 63-71.
    20. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & García-Morales, Víctor J., 2020. "Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship with the use of social media tools," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 396-412.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12341-:d:1216740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.