IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v13y2006i5p286-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry responses to EU WEEE and ROHS Directives: perspectives from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jieqiong Yu
  • Richard Welford
  • Peter Hills

Abstract

The electrical and electronics (EE) industry has come under increasing pressure to adopt extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies through the introduction of the European Union's Directives on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and the Restriction of Use of Certain Hazardous Substances (ROHS). Based on the findings of 50 questionnaires and in‐depth interviews with China's EE manufacturers, this paper investigates the perception of and readiness of companies for implementation of WEEE and ROHS in China. It identifies key difficulties encountered by manufacturers in fulfilling the requirements and evaluates the effectiveness of these two directives in promoting environmental reform. The findings indicate that the extent of companies' responses largely depends on their market structure and client requirements. Supply chain management, raw material testing and cost implications appear to be key challenges in addressing issues surrounding the directives. There is little evidence to suggest that these directives have effectively driven China's EE manufacturers towards systematic eco‐design. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieqiong Yu & Richard Welford & Peter Hills, 2006. "Industry responses to EU WEEE and ROHS Directives: perspectives from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(5), pages 286-299, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:13:y:2006:i:5:p:286-299
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Halluite & J. D. Linton & J. S. Yeomans & R. Yoogalingam, 2005. "The challenge of hazardous waste management in a sustainable environment: insights from electronic recovery laws," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 31-37, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khalid Nadvi & Gale Raj‐Reichert, 2015. "Governing health and safety at lower tiers of the computer industry global value chain," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 243-258, September.
    2. Jian Cao & Jiayang Xu & Hui Wang & Xuemei Zhang & Xihui Chen & Yunwen Zhao & Xiaoli Yang & Gengui Zhou & Jerald L. Schnoor, 2018. "Innovating Collection Modes for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-33, May.
    3. Amna Farrukh & Sanjay Mathrani & Aymen Sajjad, 2022. "A natural resource and institutional theory‐based view of green‐lean‐six sigma drivers for environmental management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    4. Dagmara Nawrocka, 2008. "Environmental supply chain management, ISO 14001 and RoHS. How are small companies in the electronics sector managing?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 349-360, November.
    5. Dou, Yijie & Sarkis, Joseph, 2013. "A multiple stakeholder perspective on barriers to implementing China RoHS regulations," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 92-104.
    6. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Amr ElAlfy & Kareem M. Darwish & Olaf Weber, 2020. "Corporations and sustainable development goals communication on social media: Corporate social responsibility or just another buzzword?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1418-1430, September.
    8. Jieqiong Yu & Peter Hills & Richard Welford, 2008. "Extended producer responsibility and eco‐design changes: perspectives from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 111-124, March.
    9. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    11. Olaf Weber, 2014. "Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 303-317, July.
    12. Jeng-Chieh Cheng & Jeen-Fong Li & Chi-Yo Huang, 2023. "Enablers for Adopting Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directives by Electronic Manufacturing Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-45, August.
    13. Filippo Corsini & Francesco Rizzi & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Marco Frey, 2015. "Extended Producer Responsibility and the Evolution of Sustainable Specializations: Evidences From the e‐Waste Sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 466-476, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noon, Michael S. & Lee, Seung-Jin & Cooper, Joyce S., 2011. "A life cycle assessment of end-of-life computer monitor management in the Seattle metropolitan region," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 22-29.
    2. Jessika Luth Richter & Sahra Svensson‐Hoglund & Carl Dalhammar & Jennifer D. Russell & Åke Thidell, 2023. "Taking stock for repair and refurbishing: A review of harvesting of spare parts from electrical and electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 868-881, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:13:y:2006:i:5:p:286-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.