IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v34y2024i1d10.1007_s12525-024-00742-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The paradox of technology quality and ethical concerns in building trust and behavioral intention in the AI-enabled face recognition payment

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Shao

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Lin Zhang

    (Northwestern Polytechnical University)

  • Tian Meng

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Jing Zhang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes a new generation of global payment solutions, while the challenge lies in understanding how to effectively influence users’ behavioral intention toward AI-enabled face recognition payment within the business ethics domain. Drawing upon trust theory and trust transfer lens, our study introduces a model aimed at examining the counteracting influences of technology quality and ethical concerns on user behavioral intention through the mediating effect of trust. Specifically, we delineate two distinct forms of trust: trust in AI-enabled face recognition technology and trust in AI-enabled face recognition payment. An empirical survey was conducted, gathering 348 valid questionnaires from users of AI-enabled face recognition payment. The empirical results demonstrate a noteworthy interaction effect between technology quality and ethical concerns on trust and behavioral intention toward AI-enabled face recognition payment, indicating a conspicuous paradox of these two factors. Our findings also reveal a trust transfer mechanism between the two trust targets in the context of AI-enabled face recognition payment, which in turn affects users’ behavioral intention. The findings of this paper make a valuable contribution to the extant mobile payment literature and enhance our understanding regarding the dual role of AI technology in shaping trust and behavioral intentions in AI-enabled face recognition payment.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Shao & Lin Zhang & Tian Meng & Jing Zhang, 2024. "The paradox of technology quality and ethical concerns in building trust and behavioral intention in the AI-enabled face recognition payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:34:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00742-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00742-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-024-00742-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-024-00742-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    2. Zhong, Yongping & Oh, Segu & Moon, Hee Cheol, 2021. "Service transformation under industry 4.0: Investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Irina Dijmãrescu & Mariana Iatagan & Iulian Hurloiu & Marinela Geamãnu & Ciprian Rusescu & Adrian Dijmãrescu, 2022. "Neuromanagement decision making in facial recognition biometric authentication as a mobile payment technology in retail, restaurant, and hotel business models," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 225-250, March.
    4. Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia & Hu, Bo, 2021. "Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: The influence of privacy-related factors," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    5. Ladhari, Riadh, 2010. "Developing e-service quality scales: A literature review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 464-477.
    6. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Anna M. Cianci & Shana M. Clor-Proell & Steven E. Kaplan, 2019. "How Do Investors Respond to Restatements? Repairing Trust Through Managerial Reputation and the Announcement of Corrective Actions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 297-312, August.
    8. Antonis Stylianou & Susan Winter & Yuan Niu & Robert Giacalone & Matt Campbell, 2013. "Understanding the Behavioral Intention to Report Unethical Information Technology Practices: The Role of Machiavellianism, Gender, and Computer Expertise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 333-343, October.
    9. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark & Serge P. da Motta Veiga, 2023. "Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring and Organizational Trust: The Role of Performance Expectancy and Social Influence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 179-197, August.
    10. Katherine J. Stewart, 2003. "Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 5-17, February.
    11. Ronald T. Cenfetelli & Andrew Schwarz, 2011. "Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 808-823, December.
    12. Du, Shuili & Xie, Chunyan, 2021. "Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 961-974.
    13. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    14. Wilkinson, Steve, 2020. "Artificial intelligence, facial recognition technology and data privacy," Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 186-198, May.
    15. Anke Arnaud & Marshall Schminke, 2012. "The Ethical Climate and Context of Organizations: A Comprehensive Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1767-1780, December.
    16. Nhung Nguyen & Michael Biderman, 2008. "Studying Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions Using Structural Equations: Evidence from the Multidimensional Ethics Scale," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 627-640, December.
    17. Andrea North-Samardzic, 2020. "Biometric Technology and Ethics: Beyond Security Applications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 433-450, December.
    18. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    19. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    20. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    21. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    22. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    23. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    2. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.
    3. Kim, Yaeri & Seok, Junhee & Roh, Taewoo, 2023. "The linkage between quality of information systems and the impact of trust-based privacy on behavioral outcomes in unmanned convenience store: Moderating effect of gender and experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 0. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    5. Hu, Bo & Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia, 2021. "Should I scan my face? The influence of perceived value and trust on Chinese users' intention to use facial recognition payment," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238028, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Dan J. Kim & Donald L. Ferrin & H. Raghav Rao, 2009. "Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 237-257, June.
    7. Paul A. Pavlou & Angelika Dimoka, 2006. "The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 392-414, December.
    8. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 2017. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 525-548, June.
    9. Zhen Wang & John Lim & Xiaojia Guo, 2010. "Negotiator Satisfaction in NSS-Facilitated Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 279-300, May.
    10. Heng Xu & Hock-Hai Teo & Bernard C. Y. Tan & Ritu Agarwal, 2012. "Research Note ---Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1342-1363, December.
    11. Joseph K. Nwankpa & Jeffrey W. Merhout, 2020. "Exploring the Effect of Digital Investment on IT Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Zhong, Junying & Chen, Tiao, 2023. "Antecedents of mobile payment loyalty: An extended perspective of perceived value and information system success model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Mario Silic & Andrea Back, 2016. "The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 151-185, January.
    14. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    16. Raed S. Algharabat & Nripendra P. Rana, 0. "Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    17. Younès Boughzala & Inès Bouzid & Imed Boughzala, 2012. "Les déterminants de l'adoption de l'e-achat public en France : une étude qualitative auprès des praticiens," Post-Print hal-02408949, HAL.
    18. Jung-Chieh Lee & Yuyin Tang & SiQi Jiang, 2023. "Understanding continuance intention of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mobile banking applications: an extension of AI characteristics to an expectation confirmation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Jackie London & Siyuan Li & Heshan Sun, 2022. "Seems Legit: An Investigation of the Assessing and Sharing of Unverifiable Messages on Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 978-1001, September.
    20. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    AI-enabled face recognition payment; Technology quality; Ethical concerns; Trust; Behavioral intention;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:34:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00742-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.